Cited by 351Diabetes Management and ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes and associated disorders

Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Sacks, David B., Arnold, Mark, Bakris, George L., Bruns, David E., Horvath, Andrea R., Lernmark, Åke, Metzger, Boyd E., Nathan, David M. +1 more·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous laboratory tests are used in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these assays varies substantially. APPROACH: An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for laboratory analysis in screening, diagnosis, or monitoring of diabetes. The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were evaluated. The draft consensus recommendations were evaluated by invited reviewers and presented for public comment. Suggestions were incorporated as deemed appropriate by the authors (see Acknowledgments). The guidelines were reviewed by the Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine Committee and the Board of Directors of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and by the Professional Practice Committee of the American Diabetes Association. CONTENT: Diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased concentrations of glucose in venous plasma or increased hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the blood. Glycemic control is monitored by the people with diabetes measuring their own blood glucose with meters and/or with continuous interstitial glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and also by laboratory analysis of HbA1c. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of ketones, autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, and C-peptide are addressed. SUMMARY: The guidelines provide specific recommendations based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes are found to have minimal clinical value at the present time, and measurement of them is not recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dci23-0036

Cites

528 of 528 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

272 of 502 cited sources checked · 153 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    The decreases of HbA 1c in those using BGM were similar to the decreases in comparably treated people who did not use BGM.

    “The decreases of HbA 1c in those using BGM were similar to the decreases in comparably treated people who did not use BGM.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [111] Malanda, 2012, Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source

      The Glycaemic control measured by HbA1c section reports that several studies found HbA1c improvements in both groups without a statistically significant difference. But the Subgroup analyses section reports a statistically significant 0.3-percentage-point greater decrease with self-monitoring at up to six months, so the unqualified statement that the decreases were similar overstates the review's findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [112] Farmer, 2012, Meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomised trials of self monitoring of blood glucose in people with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes, BMJ source
    • cites [113] Machry, 2018, Self-monitoring blood glucose improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes without intensive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
    • cites [114] Mannucci, 2018, Effects of structured versus unstructured self-monitoring of blood glucose on glucose control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, J Diabetes Sci Technol source

      In “Trials Comparing SMBG with no SMBG” (p. 3), the paper reports a statistically significant greater reduction in HbA1c with self-monitoring than without it (−0.17 percentage points in the full dataset). The Discussion (p. 5) likewise calls the reduction small but significant, rather than similar between groups. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Screening

    The presence of multiple islet autoantibodies (IAA, GADA, IA-2A/IA-2bA, or ZnT8A) is associated with a risk of type 1 diabetes of >90%.

    “The presence of multiple islet autoantibodies (IAA, GADA, IA-2A/IA-2bA, or ZnT8A) is associated with a risk of type 1 diabetes of >90% (408,422,423).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [408] Ziegler, 2013, Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children, JAMA source

      The Results section (Children With Multiple Islet Autoantibodies; page unavailable) confirms that multiple autoantibodies are associated with high risk, but reports progression of 69.7% at 10 years and 84.2% at 15 years—not greater than 90%. Adding ZnT8 autoantibodies did not substantially change the progression estimates in the cohorts where they were measured. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [422] Jacobsen, 2020, The risk of progression to type 1 diabetes is highly variable in individuals with multiple autoantibodies following screening, Diabetologia source

      The Results (Number and type of autoantibodies; page unavailable) report five-year diabetes incidences of 29% for participants with two autoantibodies and 31% for those with more than two. The Discussion says risk varies substantially after screening and that progression was questionable for a considerable number even with more than two autoantibodies. These five-year estimates do not establish lifetime risk, but the paper does not support the unqualified >90% risk attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [423] Anand, 2021, Islet autoimmunity and HLA markers of presymptomatic and clinical type 1 diabetes: joint analyses of prospective cohort studies in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the U.S, Diabetes Care source

      The Results report a higher 15-year type 1 diabetes risk with multiple autoantibodies, but the risk exceeded 90% only in some groups: it was 92% with three autoantibodies at seroconversion, versus 85% with two. Table 2 also shows that risk varied by age at development of multiple autoantibodies. The unqualified >90% figure is therefore not supported; ZnT8A was measured but excluded from the primary analyses. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation
    § Screening

    The evidence that population screening for hyperglycemia and subsequent prevention efforts will provide long-term benefit is inconsistent.

    “Notwithstanding this recommendation, the evidence that population screening for hyperglycemia and subsequent prevention efforts will provide long-term benefit is inconsistent (27).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Nathan, 2019, Does diabetes prevention translate into reduced long-term vascular complications of diabetes?, Diabetologia source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says evidence that diabetes prevention reduces long-term vascular complications is inconsistent. The paper assesses prevention studies, not population screening for hyperglycemia followed by prevention efforts, so it does not establish the claim for that broader strategy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    FPG increases with increasing age beginning in the third to fourth decade.

    “FPG increases with increasing age beginning in the third to fourth decade (97,98).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [97] Tchobroutsky, 1991, Blood glucose levels in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, Diabetologia source
    • cites [98] van den Beld, 2018, The physiology of endocrine systems with ageing, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
  • Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    Careful evaluation over several consecutive days in normoglycemic individuals revealed that biological variation of FPG (mean glucose of 4.9 mmol/L [88 mg/dL]) exhibited within-and between-subject CVs of 4.8% to 6.1% and 7.5% to 7.8%, respectively.

    “Careful evaluation over several consecutive days in normoglycemic individuals revealed that biological variation of FPG (mean glucose of 4.9 mmol/L [88 mg/dL]) exhibited within-and between-subject CVs of 4.8% to 6.1% and 7.5% to 7.8%, respectively (90)(91)(92).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [90] Widjaja, 1999, Within- and between-subject variation in commonly measured anthropometric and biochemical variables, Clin Chem source
    • cites [91] Mooy, 1996, Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn Study, Diabetologia source

      The Abstract reports test–retest variation in fasting glucose among people with normal glucose tolerance. It does not give the claimed mean of 4.9 mmol/L, the within- and between-subject CV ranges, or an evaluation over several consecutive days; searches for those figures and terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [92] Sebastián-Gámbaro, 1997, Intra- and inter-individual biological variability data bank, Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem
  • May combine two claims. 120
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 76
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    Decrease in glucose concentration in the sample due to glycolysis is a serious and underappreciated problem.

    “Decrease in glucose concentration in the sample due to glycolysis is a serious and underappreciated problem (62,63).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [62] Bruns, 2020, Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus will be flawed until we can measure glucose, Clin Chem source
    • cites [63] Bruns, 2009, Stabilization of glucose in blood samples: why it matters, Clin Chem source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    Many factors participate in the metabolic dysregulation that develops with increasing age, and changes in body composition make an important contribution.

    “Many factors participate in the metabolic dysregulation that develops with increasing age, and changes in body composition make an important contribution (100).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [100] Chia, 2018, Age-related changes in glucose metabolism, hyperglycemia, and cardiovascular risk, Circ Res source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    FPG does not increase significantly after age 60, but 2-h glucose concentrations during a 75-g OGTT are considerably higher in older people.

    “FPG does not increase significantly after age 60, but 2-h glucose concentrations during a 75-g OGTT are considerably higher in older people (98,99).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [98] van den Beld, 2018, The physiology of endocrine systems with ageing, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source

      The Glucose homoeostasis section reports that glucose concentrations two hours after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test gradually increase with age. It does not describe that increase as considerable; it also reports that fasting plasma glucose rises by approximately 0.055 mmol/L per decade, without stating that the rise becomes statistically insignificant after age 60. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [99] Blunt, 1991, Evaluation of fasting plasma glucose as screening test for NIDDM in older adults. Rancho Bernardo Study, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical

    The modeling demonstrated that increasing inaccuracy of the glucose measurements progressively increased (a) the number of severe hypoglycemic episodes over 30 days, (b) the total daily insulin use, and (c) the number of fingersticks per day.

    “The modeling demonstrated that increasing inaccuracy of the glucose measurements progressively increased (a) the number of severe hypoglycemic episodes over 30 days, (b) the total daily insulin use, and (c) the number of fingersticks per day.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [127] Campos-Náñez, 2017, Clinical impact of blood glucose monitoring accuracy: an in-silico study, J Diabetes Sci Technol source

      The Results sections report that higher measurement error is associated with more severe hypoglycemia, and that high error rates and positive bias increase daily insulin use and fingerstick counts. The study simulated 30 days, but Table 2 reports severe hypoglycemia as events per six months, not as a count over 30 days. Its results also depend on meter bias, so they do not establish an unqualified progressive increase for every meter. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical

    The second modeling study demonstrated that meter inaccuracy increased the total cost of health care (including costs associated with hypoglycemic episodes), with the least accurate meters producing the greatest costs.

    “The second modeling study (128) demonstrated that meter inaccuracy increased the total cost of health care (including costs associated with hypoglycemic episodes), with the least accurate meters producing the greatest costs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [128] Fortwaengler, 2018, The financial impact of inaccurate blood glucose monitoring systems, J Diabetes Sci Technol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with type 1 diabetes show that rt-CGM leads to lower HbA 1c and reduced time in the hypoglycemic range.

    “Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with type 1 diabetes show that rt-CGM leads to lower HbA 1c (156-159) and reduced time in the hypoglycemic range (160,161).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [156] Beck, 2017, Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial, JAMA source
    • cites [157] Riddlesworth, 2017, Hypoglycemic event frequency and the effect of continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections, Diabetes Ther source

      The Introduction reports that participants randomized to CGM in the DIAMOND trial had larger A1C decreases and less time in hypoglycemic ranges than controls. This supports the outcomes for one trial, but the paper does not establish that most RCTs in adults with type 1 diabetes show both effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [158] Lind, 2017, Continuous glucose monitoring vs conventional therapy for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: the GOLD randomized clinical trial, JAMA source
    • cites [159] Tamborlane, 2008, Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes, N Engl J Med source
    • cites [160] Hermanns, 2014, The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on low interstitial glucose values and low blood glucose values assessed by point-of-care blood glucose meters: results of a crossover trial, J Diabetes Sci Technol source
    • cites [161] van Beers, 2016, Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Frequency of Measurement

    In a study of individuals under 18 years of age with type 1 diabetes, the frequency of BGM was found to correlate inversely with HbA 1c and with the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis.

    “In a study of individuals under 18 years of age with type 1 diabetes, the frequency of BGM was found to correlate inversely with HbA 1c and with the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (151).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [151] Ziegler, 2011, Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, Pediatr Diabetes source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Frequency of Measurement

    Testing more frequently than 10 times per day was not associated with greater control of glycemia as HbA 1c levels were similar in participants testing 10 to 12 times per day and in those testing 13 or more times per day (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively).

    “Testing more frequently than 10 times per day was not associated with greater control of glycemia as HbA 1c levels were similar in participants testing 10 to 12 times per day and in those testing 13 or more times per day (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [150] Miller, 2013, Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    A systematic review of RCTs in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes suggested that is-CGM may reduce HbA 1c in those with type 1 diabetes or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, while another systematic review of studies (primarily in type 1 diabetes) with randomized or cohort designs suggested a small (0.26%) but statistically significant reduction in HbA 1c.

    “A systematic review of RCTs in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes suggested that is-CGM may reduce HbA 1c in those with type 1 diabetes or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (166), while another systematic review of studies (primarily in type 1 diabetes) with randomized or cohort designs suggested a small (0.26%) but statistically significant reduction in HbA 1c (167).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [166] Cowart, 2020, Systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating glycemic efficacy and patient satisfaction of intermittent-scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes, Diabetes Technol Ther source
    • cites [167] Castellana, 2020, Efficacy and safety of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Although most RCTs have not been powered to detect reductions in the rate of severe hypoglycemia, a study in people over the age of 60 with type 1 diabetes (a population at high risk of hypoglycemia) showed significant reductions in both time in the hypoglycemic range and severe hypoglycemic events.

    “Although most RCTs have not been powered to detect reductions in the rate of severe hypoglycemia, a study in people over the age of 60 with type 1 diabetes (a population at high risk of hypoglycemia) showed significant reductions in both time in the hypoglycemic range and severe hypoglycemic events (162).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [162] Pratley, 2020, Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interferences

    Many meters incorporate changes that eliminate or greatly ameliorate most interferences, but interferences persist.

    “Many meters incorporate changes that eliminate or greatly ameliorate most interferences, but interferences persist (137,138).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [137] Sai, 2019, Evaluation of linearity and interference effect on SMBG and POCT devices, showing drastic high values, low values, or error messages, J Diabetes Sci Technol source

      The Discussion describes newer meters with interference-detection and error-display functions, and the Conclusions report that interference-related errors still occur. The paper does not establish that many meters have such changes or that the changes eliminate or greatly ameliorate most interferences. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [138] Vanavanan, 2010, Performance of a new interference-resistant glucose meter, Clin Biochem source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Randomized controlled trials of the use of rt-CGM, compared with standard blood glucose monitoring, in adults with type 2 diabetes have generally shown reductions in HbA 1c with no significant change in time in hypoglycemia.

    “Randomized controlled trials of the use of rt-CGM, compared with standard blood glucose monitoring, in adults with type 2 diabetes have generally shown reductions in HbA 1c with no significant change in time in hypoglycemia (169-172).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [169] Yoo, 2008, Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
    • cites [170] Ehrhardt, 2011, The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, J Diabetes Sci Technol source
    • cites [171] Beck, 2017, Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med source
    • cites [172] Martens, 2021, Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA source

      The Primary and Key Secondary Outcomes section reports significantly lower HbA1c with CGM than with blood glucose meter monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. But the Other Glycemic Outcomes section reports exploratory reductions in time below both 54 mg/dL (P = .001) and 70 mg/dL (P = .02), rather than no significant change in time in hypoglycemia. This trial also cannot establish what trials generally found. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes is markedly increased in women aged 35 to 44 years, in those with race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White, and those with obesity.

    “Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes is markedly increased in women aged 35 to 44 years, in those with race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White, and those with obesity (249).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [249] Azeez, 2019, Hypertension and diabetes in non-pregnant women of reproductive age in the United States, Prev Chronic Dis source

      The Results (page not supplied) report higher prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes among women in the listed racial/ethnic groups and among women with obesity. They report higher prevalence of diabetes overall at ages 35–39 and 40–44, but do not establish that undiagnosed diabetes specifically was more prevalent at those ages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    One RCT of rt-CGM use during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes showed a modest but statistically significant reduction of HbA 1c in women randomized to rt-CGM compared with those randomized to continuing to use blood glucose meters, with no differences in severe hypoglycemia.

    “One RCT of rt-CGM use during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes showed a modest but statistically significant reduction of HbA 1c in women randomized to rt-CGM compared with those randomized to continuing to use blood glucose meters, with no differences in severe hypoglycemia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [184] Feig, 2017, Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial, Lancet source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    One RCT of rt-CGM versus blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus showed no significant differences in HbA 1c or neonatal outcomes but less weight gain with CGM use.

    “One RCT of rt-CGM versus blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus showed no significant differences in HbA 1c or neonatal outcomes but less weight gain with CGM use (185).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [185] Wei, 2016, Effect of a CGMS and SMBG on maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial, Sci Rep source

      The Abstract and Results report an RCT in women with gestational diabetes: HbA1c and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly, while the CGMS group gained significantly less weight. The Methods identify the device as a Gold Medtronic MiniMed CGMS but do not establish that the intervention was real-time CGM, so that specification is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    The increasing accuracy of CGM devices and at least one RCT comparing nonadjunctive to adjunctive use has led the FDA to approve most current CGM devices for nonadjunctive use in the U.S.

    “However, the increasing accuracy of the devices and at least one RCT comparing nonadjunctive to adjunctive use (191) has led the FDA to approve most current CGM devices for nonadjunctive use in the U.S.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [191] Aleppo, 2017, REPLACE-BG: a randomized trial comparing continuous glucose monitoring with and without routine blood glucose monitoring in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    The accuracy of CGM devices has improved significantly over time, with manufacturers of current devices reporting mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) proportions of 8.1% to 12.3%, compared with 5% to 10% for current BGM devices (and 22% for the first intermittently read interstitial glucose monitor brought to market in 2001).

    “The accuracy of CGM devices has improved significantly over time, with manufacturers of current devices reporting mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) proportions of 8.1% to 12.3%, compared with 5% to 10% for current BGM devices (and 22% for the first intermittently read interstitial glucose monitor brought to market in 2001) (190).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [190] Facchinetti, 2016, Continuous glucose monitoring sensors: past, present and future algorithmic challenges, Sensors (Basel) source

      Section 2, “The Past: The ‘Smart’ CGM Sensor” (page unavailable), documents improved CGM accuracy, including a reduction in one device’s MARD from 13% to 9%. Section 3 says CGM accuracy became comparable to commercial SMBG devices. The text passages do not substantiate the claimed 8.1%–12.3% CGM range, 5%–10% BGM range, or 22% figure for a monitor introduced in 2001. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    In that cohort study, approximately 25% of those assigned to the 1-step group went through the 2-step process and the caregivers were not blinded to assignment of the participants.

    “Unfortunately, approximately 25% of those assigned to the 1-step group went through the 2-step process and the caregivers were not blinded to assignment of the participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [261] Hillier, 2021, A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening, N Engl J Med source

      Methods (Randomization; page unavailable) states that providers could not be blinded, and Methods (Statistical Methods; page unavailable) says some participants assigned to 1-step screening received 2-step screening. Results (Trial Population; page unavailable) reports 66% adherence in the 1-step arm, but does not establish that approximately 25% specifically underwent 2-step screening. The paper describes a randomized trial, not a cohort study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    The HAPO FUS documented in both groups that risk of disorders of glucose metabolism at follow-up were associated with GDM and continuously with maternal glucose concentrations.

    “The HAPO FUS documented in both groups that risk of disorders of glucose metabolism at follow-up were associated with GDM and continuously with maternal glucose concentrations (268,269).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [268] Lowe, 2018, Association of gestational diabetes with maternal disorders of glucose metabolism and childhood adiposity, JAMA source

      The ‘Gestational Diabetes Status and Maternal Outcomes’ results report that disorders of glucose metabolism at follow-up were more frequent in mothers with gestational diabetes (52.2%) than in those without it (20.1%). This paper’s child outcomes concern adiposity, not disorders of glucose metabolism, and the passages do not establish a continuous association between maternal glucose concentrations and follow-up glucose disorders in both mothers and children. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [269] Lowe, 2019, Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome follow-up study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source

      The Results (Association of Maternal GDM Status With Childhood Dichotomous Glucose Outcomes; page unavailable) report that maternal GDM was associated with impaired glucose tolerance in offspring aged 10–14, but not with impaired fasting glucose; type 2 diabetes cases were too few to analyze. This paper examines children, not outcomes in both mothers and children, and the passages found do not establish a continuous association between maternal glucose concentrations and follow-up disorders. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    Although two RCTs found that treatment of GDM can reduce perinatal morbidity, it is not known whether treatment reduces long-term risks in children.

    “Although two RCTs found that treatment of GDM can reduce perinatal morbidity (264,265), it is not known whether treatment reduces long-term risks in children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [264] Crowther, 2005, Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes, N Engl J Med source
    • cites [265] Landon, 2009, A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes, N Engl J Med source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    In that cohort study, different glucose cutoffs for the 2-step screening were applied at the two sites.

    “Moreover, different glucose cutoffs for the 2-step screening were applied at the two sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [261] Hillier, 2021, A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening, N Engl J Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    In a large (23,792 women) cohort study, the frequency of GDM detected with the 1-step process was approximately twice that found with the 2-step process, but no significant differences in prespecified single or composite outcomes were found between the two groups.

    “The frequency of GDM detected with the 1-step process was approximately twice that found with the 2-step process, but no significant differences in prespecified single or composite outcomes were found between the two groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [261] Hillier, 2021, A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening, N Engl J Med source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    The colorimetric reaction between acetoacetate and nitroprusside produces a purple color.

    “Frequently used is the colorimetric reaction that occurs between AcAc and nitroprusside (sodium nitroferricyanide), resulting in a purple color (301).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [301] Brooke, 2016, Evaluation of the accuracy of capillary hydroxybutyrate measurement compared with other measurements in the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis: a systematic review, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Blood Ketone Determinations

    Blood ketone determinations that measure beta-hydroxybutyrate specifically are useful for both diagnosis and ongoing monitoring of diabetic ketoacidosis.

    “Blood ketone determinations that measure bOHB specifically are useful for both diagnosis (299,301) and ongoing monitoring of DKA (298,299).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [299] Kilpatrick, 2022, Controversies around the measurement of blood ketones to diagnose and manage diabetic ketoacidosis, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [301] Brooke, 2016, Evaluation of the accuracy of capillary hydroxybutyrate measurement compared with other measurements in the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis: a systematic review, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
    • cites [298] Dhatariya, 2020, Diabetic ketoacidosis, Nat Rev Dis Primers source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Use/Rationale

    The presence of urine ketones is highly sensitive for DKA or significant ketosis, with high negative predictive value suggesting utility in ruling out DKA.

    “The presence of urine ketones is highly sensitive for DKA or significant ketosis, with high negative predictive value suggesting utility in ruling out DKA (300,301).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [300] Schwab, 1999, Screening for ketonemia in patients with diabetes, Ann Emerg Med source
    • cites [301] Brooke, 2016, Evaluation of the accuracy of capillary hydroxybutyrate measurement compared with other measurements in the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis: a systematic review, Int J Environ Res Public Health source

      The Conclusions report high sensitivity for urine ketones in identifying DKA in the emergency department. But the Results report a urine-ketone negative predictive value of 71.84% in one study, and the Discussion notes DKA deaths in patients with negative urine-ketone tests. The source therefore does not support the claimed high negative predictive value or the suggested use of a negative test to rule out DKA. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Due to its high specificity, urine glucose is advocated by the IDF as a screening test for undiagnosed diabetes in low-resource settings where other procedures are not available.

    “In addition, due to its high specificity, urine glucose is advocated by the IDF as a screening test for undiagnosed diabetes in low-resource settings where other procedures are not available (297).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [297] International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group, 2014, Global guideline for type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source

      The guideline’s screening discussion says urine glucose has high specificity (>98%) and may have a place for detecting undiagnosed diabetes in low-resource settings where other procedures are unavailable. But it also notes low sensitivity (21–64%); “may have a place” is more cautious than saying the IDF advocates it as a screening test. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    The two major mechanisms responsible for the high ketone concentrations in people with diabetes are increased production from triglycerides and decreased utilization in the liver, both a result of absolute or relative insulin deficiency and increased counterregulatory hormones including cortisol, epinephrine, glucagon, and growth hormone.

    “The two major mechanisms responsible for the high ketone concentrations in people with diabetes are increased production from triglycerides and decreased utilization in the liver, both a result of absolute or relative insulin deficiency and increased counterregulatory hormones including cortisol, epinephrine, glucagon, and growth hormone (298).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [298] Dhatariya, 2020, Diabetic ketoacidosis, Nat Rev Dis Primers source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Target Levels/Treatment Goals

    Stringent control of HbA1c values during pregnancy decreases congenital malformations, large-for-date infants, and the complications of pregnancy and delivery.

    “Specifically, stringent control of HbA 1c values during pregnancy decreases congenital malformations, large-for-date infants, and the complications of pregnancy and delivery that can otherwise occur when glycemic control is not carefully managed (333).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [333] Kitzmiller, 2008, Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy, Diabetes Care source

      The Initial evaluation section links good glycemic control to fewer oversized infants and maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications. It places the risk of congenital malformations in the first few weeks of pregnancy and recommends achieving near-normal A1C before pregnancy to prevent them. The claim omits that timing distinction, implying that stringent control at any point during pregnancy reduces malformations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A (moderate)

    Analysis of 60 studies with 13 devices showed that most point-of-care HbA1c devices had negative bias and large standard deviations.

    “Analysis of 60 studies with 13 devices showed that most devices had negative bias (all the others had positive bias) and large standard deviations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [324] Hirst, 2017, Performance of point-of-care HbA1c test devices: implications for use in clinical practice—a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin Chem Lab Med source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § A (moderate)

    An HbA1c value of 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or greater is considered diagnostic of diabetes.

    “An HbA 1c value of 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or greater is considered diagnostic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [319] Selvin, 2018, Prognostic implications of single-sample confirmatory testing for undiagnosed diabetes: a prospective cohort study, Ann Intern Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A (moderate)

    The role of HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes was first proposed and implemented in 2009, made possible by improved assay standardization through the NGSP and IFCC, and new data demonstrating the association between HbA1c concentrations and risk for retinopathy.

    “The role of HbA 1c in the diagnosis of diabetes was first proposed and implemented in 2009 ( 22), made possible by improved assay standardization through the NGSP (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program) and IFCC, and new data demonstrating the association between HbA 1c concentrations and risk for retinopathy (22).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] International Expert Committee, 2009, International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetes Care source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Blood Ketone Determinations

    In that study, the comparator was conversion when urine ketones were negative, which is not a typical marker for resolution.

    “However, the comparator was conversion when urine ketones were negative, which is not a typical marker for resolution (308).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [308] Noyes, 2007, Hydroxybutyrate near-patient testing to evaluate a new end-point for intravenous insulin therapy in the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in children, Pediatr Diabetes source

      The Abstract identifies the comparator as the study’s current end-point B, but it required both pH above 7.3 and ketone-free urine—not negative urine ketones alone. The Discussion supports the qualification that negative urine ketones are not a generally required marker for transition: it says guidelines allow urinary ketones to remain present and that practice varies between centres. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Monitoring

    HbA1c is used as an index of mean glycemia, as a measure of risk for the development of diabetes complications, and to set goals of therapy for people with diabetes.

    “HbA 1c is used as an index of mean glycemia, as a measure of risk for the development of diabetes complications, and, most importantly, to set goals of therapy for people with diabetes (295,318,327).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [295] Goldstein, 2004, Tests of glycemia in diabetes, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [318] Sacks, 2011, A1c versus glucose testing: a comparison, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [327] American Diabetes Association, 2000, Implications of the diabetes control and complications trial, Diabetes Care

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    A study among races showed that all measures of glycemia, including HbA1c, fructosamine, and glycated albumin, were on average higher among Black participants compared with White participants, and that the measures were similarly associated with risk of nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease in the different races.

    “In addition, a study among races showed that all measures of glycemia, including HbA 1c , fructosamine, and glycated albumin, were on average higher among Black participants compared with White participants, and that the measures were similarly associated with risk of nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the different races (340).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [340] Parrinello, 2016, Racial differences in and prognostic value of biomarkers of hyperglycemia, Diabetes Care source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Other Patient-Related Factors and Interfering Factors.

    One study has suggested that differences in mean red cell half-life may explain some of the interindividual variability in the relationship between measured average glucose and HbA1c levels.

    “One study has suggested that differences in mean red cell half-life, which may range from approximately 48 to 68 days (mean 58 days and 1 SD of 4.5 to 6.5 days), may explain some of the interindividual variability in the relationship between measured average glucose and HbA 1c levels (343).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [343] Malka, 2016, Mechanistic modeling of hemoglobin glycation and red blood cell kinetics enables personalized diabetes monitoring, Sci Transl Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Traceability of HbA 1c Methods.

    The NGSP reference method is a cation-exchange HPLC method that quantifies HbA1c and is a CLSI-designated comparison method.

    “The NGSP reference method, which was the DCCT primary reference, is a cation-exchange HPLC method that quantifies HbA 1c and is a CLSI-designated comparison method (360).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [360] Steffes, 2005, Hemoglobin A1c measurements over nearly two decades: sustaining comparable values throughout the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study, Clin Chem source

      The Materials and Methods section (REFERENCE METHOD AT THE BHL; page not provided) describes the DCCT reference method as an ion-exchange HPLC assay that quantifies HbA1c. The paper also describes the BHL’s role in NGSP network monitoring, but the passages do not establish that CLSI designated the method a comparison method. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Traceability of HbA 1c Methods.

    Since 1996, the NGSP has standardized glycated hemoglobin test results among laboratories to DCCT-equivalent HbA1c values and focused on improving worldwide assay performance.

    “Since 1996, the NGSP, initiated under the auspices of the AACC and endorsed by the ADA, has standardized GHb test results among laboratories to DCCT-equivalent HbA 1c values (357-359) and focused on improving worldwide assay performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [357] Little, 2019, The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: over 20 years of improving hemoglobin A1c measurement, Clin Chem source
    • cites [358] Little, 2001, The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: a five-year progress report, Clin Chem

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [359] Goldstein, 1997, Bringing order to chaos: the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, Contemp Intern Med

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Traceability of HbA 1c Methods.

    Most HbA1c methods can be classified into groups based on assay principle.

    “Most methods can be classified into groups based on assay principle (66,295,312).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [66] Rifai, 2017, Carbohydrates

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [295] Goldstein, 2004, Tests of glycemia in diabetes, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [312] Goldstein, 1986, Glycated hemoglobin: methodologies and clinical applications, Clin Chem

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Diagnosis/Screening Type 1 Diabetes.

    These additional genetic factors may assist in assigning a probability of the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes of uncertain etiology, and genetic risk scores for type 1 diabetes have been developed.

    “These additional genetic factors may assist in assigning a probability of the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes of uncertain etiology, and genetic risk scores for type 1 diabetes have been developed (390).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [390] Ferrat, 2020, A combined risk score enhances prediction of type 1 diabetes among susceptible children, Nat Med source

      The First Paragraph says genetic factors have been used in type 1 diabetes prediction and that combined risk factors improve the accuracy of diagnoses in adult incident cases. Extended Data Fig. 2 also describes several genetic risk scores. The paper does not show that these scores assign a probability of type 1 diabetes as the diagnosis when a patient's diabetes etiology is uncertain; its individual probability estimates concern future disease risk in children. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis/Screening Type 1 Diabetes.

    Mutational analyses are established for classification of diabetes in the neonate as well as in young individuals with a dominant family history of diabetes (MODY).

    “However, an exception is the mutational analyses established for classification of diabetes in the neonate (381-384) as well as in young individuals with a dominant family history of diabetes, often referred to as maturityonset diabetes of the young (MODY) (384,385) (Table 8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [381] Edghill, 2008, Insulin mutation screening in 1,044 patients with diabetes: mutations in the INS gene are a common cause of neonatal diabetes but a rare cause of diabetes diagnosed in childhood or adulthood, Diabetes source
    • cites [382] Støy, 2008, Diagnosis and treatment of neonatal diabetes: a United States experience, Pediatr Diabetes source

      The Conclusions state that testing for genetic defects in neonatal diabetes is critical for guiding management, and the Results report genetic diagnoses in 20 of 32 patients diagnosed before six months of age. The paper describes a family with MODY-type diabetes in the Discussion (Variable phenotype), but does not establish mutational analysis as a classification method for young people with a dominant family history of diabetes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [383] Murphy, 2008, Clinical implications of a molecular genetic classification of monogenic beta-cell diabetes, Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [384] Carlsson, 2020, Absence of islet autoantibodies and modestly raised glucose values at diabetes diagnosis should lead to testing for MODY: lessons from a 5-year pediatric Swedish National Cohort Study, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [385] Fajans, 2001, Molecular mechanisms and clinical pathophysiology of maturity-onset diabetes of the young, N Engl J Med source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § GENETIC MARKERS Description/Introduction/ Terminology

    Up to 90% of individuals with type 1 diabetes diagnosed before age 30 years have the HLA haplotypes DRB1*04-DQA1*03:01-DQB1*03:02 (DR4-DQ8), DRB1*03-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01 (DR3-DQ2.5), or both.

    “Up to 90% of individuals with type 1 diabetes diagnosed before age 30 years have the HLA haplotypes DRB1*04-DQA1*03:01-DQB1* 03:02(DR4-DQ8), DRB1*03-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01 (DR3-DQ2.5),or both (379).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [379] Graham, 2002, Genetic effects on age-dependent onset and islet cell autoantibody markers in type 1 diabetes, Diabetes source

      The Discussion (page not available in our copy) discusses DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes in patients with type 1 diabetes and relates their disease risk to age at onset. It does not report that up to 90% of people diagnosed before age 30 carry either specified DR–DQ haplotype, or both; that prevalence and age cutoff are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Although several islet autoantibodies have been detected in individuals with type 1 diabetes, and these have prognostic value in individuals at high risk of type 1 diabetes, routine measurement of islet autoantibodies has limited use outside of clinical studies.

    “Although several islet autoantibodies have been detected in individuals with type 1 diabetes, and these have prognostic value in individuals at high risk of type 1 diabetes, routine measurement of islet autoantibodies has limited use outside of clinical studies (410).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [410] Warshauer, 2020, New frontiers in the treatment of type 1 diabetes, Cell Metab source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § AUTOIMMUNE MARKERS Description/Introduction/ Terminology

    In children with only one persistent islet autoantibody, the risk of diabetes within 10 years is 15% while two or more islet autoantibodies predict type 1 diabetes in 70% within 10 years.

    “In children with only one persistent islet autoantibody, the risk of diabetes within 10 years is 15% while two or more islet autoantibodies predict type 1 diabetes in 70% within 10 years (408,409).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [408] Ziegler, 2013, Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children, JAMA source
    • cites [409] Vehik, 2020, Hierarchical order of distinct autoantibody spreading and progression to type 1 diabetes in the TEDDY study, Diabetes Care source

      The Results (page unavailable) report that children who developed a second autoantibody had a higher risk of type 1 diabetes than those who remained positive for one. The Conclusions (page unavailable) likewise describe multiple autoantibodies as conferring higher risk. Neither passage gives the claimed 10-year risks of 15% and 70%; the figure caption instead identifies a five-year comparison. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis/Screening Type 1 Diabetes.

    There is some evidence that early diagnosis may prevent hospitalization with ketoacidosis and preserve residual b-cells.

    “There is some evidence that early diagnosis may prevent hospitalization with ketoacidosis and preserve residual b-cells (393).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [393] Barker, 2004, Clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes through intensive screening and follow-up, Diabetes Care source

      The Onset hospitalization section (page not provided) reports far fewer hospitalizations among closely followed DAISY children than community cases, and the discussion describes decreased hospitalization for DKA at onset. The Insulin dose section reports lower insulin requirements after diagnosis, but the paper does not establish that early diagnosis preserves residual beta cells. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    Depending on the specific MODY mutation, the disease can be mild (e.g., glucokinase mutation) and not usually associated with long term complications of diabetes or as severe as typical type 1 diabetes (e.g., HNF mutations).

    “Depending on the specific MODY mutation, the disease can be mild (e.g., glucokinase mutation) and not usually associated with long term complications of diabetes or as severe as typical type 1 diabetes (e.g., hepatocyte nuclear factor [HNF] mutations) (2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 Diabetes and MODY.

    Type 2 diabetes is a heterogenous polygenic disease with both resistance to the action of insulin and defective insulin secretion.

    “Type 2 diabetes is a heterogenous polygenic disease with both resistance to the action of insulin and defective insulin secretion (4,5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Reaven, 1988, Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease, Diabetes source
    • cites [5] Sacks, 1996, The pathogenesis of type II diabetes mellitus. A polygenic disease, Am J Clin Pathol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 Diabetes and MODY.

    The risk alleles in these loci all have relatively small effects and do not significantly enhance our ability to predict the risk of type 2 diabetes.

    “However, the risk alleles in these loci all have relatively small effects and do not significantly enhance our ability to predict the risk of type 2 diabetes (396,397).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [396] Viñuela, 2020, Genetic variant effects on gene expression in human pancreatic islets and their implications for T2D, Nat Commun source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports smaller eQTL effects for variants in certain islet regulatory regions, but those are effects on gene expression, not estimates of how much the alleles change diabetes risk. The Introduction and Results (pages unavailable) discuss risk variants and their mechanisms; searches for risk-effect sizes and predictive ability found no passage assessing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [397] Meigs, 2008, Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes, N Engl J Med source

      The Discussion reports small individual per-allele effects and says the 18-allele score did not substantially improve prediction beyond common phenotypic risk factors measured in adulthood. The claim omits that condition: the paper also reports modest discriminatory ability when only factors known in youth were considered. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 Diabetes and MODY.

    Genome-wide association studies have identified more than 30 genetic factors, which increase the risk for type 2 diabetes.

    “Genome-wide association studies have identified more than 30 genetic factors, which increase the risk for type 2 diabetes (394,395).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [394] Mahajan, 2018, Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps, Nat Genet source
    • cites [395] Mansour Aly, 2021, Genome-wide association analyses highlight etiological differences underlying newly defined subtypes of diabetes, Nat Genet source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    ICA tests measure the degree of binding of immunoglobulin to islet sections and are compared with a WHO standard serum available from the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control.

    “ICA tests measure the degree of binding of immunoglobulin to islet sections and are compared with a WHO standard serum available from the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control (437).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [437] Mire-Sluis, 2000, The World Health Organization International Collaborative Study for islet cell antibodies, Diabetologia source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    Most individuals without diabetes who have only one autoantibody will not develop type 1 diabetes; the 10-year risk is about 15%.

    “Most individuals without diabetes who have only one autoantibody will not develop type 1 diabetes, as the 10-year risk is about 15% (408).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [408] Ziegler, 2013, Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children, JAMA source

      The Results section, “Children With a Single Islet Autoantibody,” reports a 14.5% risk of progression to diabetes within 10 years, supporting the approximate 15% figure and the statement that most did not progress. The study measured this risk in children, however, while the citing sentence extends it to individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis/Screening

    Diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in the Western world.

    “Diabetes is associated with a high rate of cardiovascular events and is also the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in the Western world (452).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [452] Thurlow, 2021, Global epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease and disparities in kidney replacement therapy, Am J Nephrol source

      In the Introduction’s section on geographic variation in treated ESKD incidence (page unavailable), the review identifies diabetes as a risk factor associated with kidney disease in high-income countries, including the US and Europe. It does not say diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in the Western world. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis/Screening

    Diabetes is associated with a high rate of cardiovascular events.

    “Diabetes is associated with a high rate of cardiovascular events and is also the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in the Western world (452).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [452] Thurlow, 2021, Global epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease and disparities in kidney replacement therapy, Am J Nephrol source

      The section on ESKD incidence in the United States discusses diabetes as a contributor to kidney-disease burden, while the section on KRT access lists diabetes and cardiovascular disease separately. Neither passage addresses whether people with diabetes have a high rate of cardiovascular events (searched: “diabetes cardiovascular events” and “cardiovascular”). (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Prognosis

    Moderately increased albuminuria without hypertension indicates increased relative risk of CKD progression, but absolute risks of end-stage kidney disease are higher with concomitant hypertension.

    “Moderately increased albuminuria without hypertension indicates increased relative risk of CKD progression, but absolute risks of end-stage kidney disease are higher with concomitant hypertension (485-487).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [485] Weir, 2010, Editorial perspective. Should microalbuminuria ever be considered as a renal endpoint in any clinical trial?, Am J Nephrol source
    • cites [486] Mok, 2021, Albuminuria and prognosis among individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the ARIC study, J Am Coll Cardiol source
    • cites [487] Mok, 2019, Albuminuria as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction, J Am Heart Assoc source

      The Introduction and Conclusions examine albuminuria as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction, not CKD progression or end-stage kidney disease. Searches for relative and absolute kidney-disease risks with and without hypertension found only a related reference title, not a passage stating the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Quantitative.

    Calibration bias was the main source of error for differences among urine albumin measurement methods, and precision was adequate for most assays.

    “The authors concluded that calibration bias was the main source of error for differences among methods and precision was adequate for most assays.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [498] Bachmann, 2014, State of the art for measurement of urine albumin: comparison of routine measurement procedures to isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry, Clin Chem source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Semiquantitative or Qualitative.

    Screening using two tests with either being positive increases sensitivity to 97% but reduces specificity to 83%.

    “Screening using two tests with either being positive interpreted as a positive (leading to subsequent quantitative testing) increases the sensitivity to 97% but reduces the specificity to 83% (500,501).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [500] McTaggart, 2014, Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care tests for detecting albuminuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ann Intern Med source
    • cites [501] Shin, 2021, Albuminuria testing in hypertension and diabetes: an individual-participant data meta-analysis in a global consortium, Hypertension source

      The Results section on ACR testing rates reports how often patients were tested, and the Methods section describes repeat ACR measurements. Neither evaluates a two-test screening rule in which either positive result triggers quantitative testing, or reports 97% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Searches for those figures and the two-test rule found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Semiquantitative or Qualitative.

    The semiquantitative uACR dipstick method can minimize testing time and inconvenience and significantly reduce national health costs.

    “Moreover, the authors point out that it can minimize the testing time and inconvenience and significantly reduce national health costs (503).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [503] Kim, 2020, Can a semi-quantitative method replace the current quantitative method for the annual screening of microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes? Diagnostic accuracy and cost-saving analysis considering the potential health burden, PLoS One source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    In the KDIGO and ADA algorithms, the diagnosis of moderately increased or severely increased albuminuria requires increased albumin excretion on two of three tests repeated over 3 to 6 months and exclusion of conditions that invalidate the test.

    “In the KDIGO and ADA algorithms for urine albumin testing (506), the diagnosis of moderately increased or severely increased albuminuria requires the demonstration of increased albumin excretion on two of three tests repeated at intervals over a period of 3 to 6 months and exclusion of conditions that invalidate the test.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [506] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 12. Retinopathy, neuropathy, and foot care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Semiquantitative or Qualitative.

    A negative semiquantitative POC test result does not rule out albuminuria, whereas quantitative POC testing meets required performance standards and can be used to rule out albuminuria.

    “The authors concluded that a negative semiquantitative POC test result does not rule out albuminuria, whereas quantitative POC testing meets required performance standards and can be used to rule out albuminuria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [501] Shin, 2021, Albuminuria testing in hypertension and diabetes: an individual-participant data meta-analysis in a global consortium, Hypertension source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) mentions routine urine dipstick testing, but does not evaluate negative semiquantitative results. The Discussion (page unavailable) concerns ACR screening rates, not point-of-care test accuracy. Searches for semiquantitative and quantitative POC testing found no passage addressing rule-out performance or required standards. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    The most reliable method is the immunoturbidimetric laboratory assay, which has >95% sensitivity and specificity to detect moderately increased albuminuria.

    “The most reliable method is the immunoturbidimetric laboratory assay, which should be considered the standard for comparison as it has >95% sensitivity and specificity to detect moderately increased albuminuria (505).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [505] Shaikh, 2008, Comparison between immunoturbidimetry, size-exclusion chromatography, and LC-MS to quantify urinary albumin, Clin Chem source

      The Materials and Methods (IMMUNOASSAY; page unavailable) identify immunoturbidimetry as the laboratory’s routine clinical urine-albumin assay. But the Results (METHOD COMPARISON; page unavailable) report that it underestimated albumin with the supplied calibrators, and the paper gives no >95% diagnostic sensitivity or specificity for detecting moderately increased albuminuria. It does not establish immunoturbidimetry as the most reliable method or the standard for comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Semiquantitative or Qualitative.

    Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the quantitative POC test were 96% and 98%, respectively.

    “Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the quantitative test were 96% (95% CI, 78-99%) and 98% (95% CI, 93-99%), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [501] Shin, 2021, Albuminuria testing in hypertension and diabetes: an individual-participant data meta-analysis in a global consortium, Hypertension source

      The Methods (Outcomes and Statistical Analyses) and Results (ACR Testing Rate and Prevalence of ACR ≥30 mg/g) describe albumin-to-creatinine ratio testing rates and albuminuria prevalence, not the diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative point-of-care test. Searches for the quantitative test, sensitivity, specificity, and the stated confidence intervals found no passage supporting the 96% and 98% estimates. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use Diagnosis.

    Measures of insulin resistance predicted risk of diabetes or CAD only moderately, with no threshold effects.

    “and that measures of insulin resistance (which include insulin measurements) predicted risk of diabetes or CAD only moderately, with no threshold effects (509).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [509] Rutter, 2008, Use of alternative thresholds defining insulin resistance to predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, Circulation source

      The Conclusions report modest predictive performance and no apparent threshold effects for surrogate measures of insulin resistance. However, the paper assesses diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD), not coronary artery disease (CAD) separately; the DM and CVD Assessment section defines CVD to include noncoronary events such as stroke and heart failure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    There is a need for further coordination to assure worldwide harmonization of C-peptide.

    “Stakeholders in the U.S., Japan, and elsewhere have worked on developing a reference standard and traceability schemes, but there is a need for further coordination to assure worldwide harmonization of C-peptide (516).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [516] Little, 2017, Implementing a reference measurement system for C-peptide: successes and lessons learned, Clin Chem source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Semiquantitative or Qualitative.

    Pooled sensitivity and specificity at uACR >30 mg/g were 0.82 and 0.88; at uACR 30 to 300 mg/g were 0.72 and 0.82; and at uACR >300 mg/g were 0.84 and 0.97.

    “The pooled sensitivity and specificity at each cutoff point were the following: uACR >30 mg/g, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87)and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.91);uACR 30 to 300 mg/g, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77)and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89);and uACR >300 mg/g, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71-0.90)and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99),respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [502] Mejia, 2021, Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albuminuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Heliyon source

      The Results of meta-analyses and Summary of findings report all six pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates at the stated ACR cutoffs. However, the citing sentence gives two confidence-interval bounds that differ from those sections: specificity at 30–300 mg/g ends at 0.89 rather than 0.86, and sensitivity at >300 mg/g begins at 0.71 rather than 0.74. Those bounds do appear in the paper’s Abstract, so the paper is internally inconsistent on them. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    HNF1B mutations cause HNF1B-MODY.

    “HNF1B-MODY”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    ABCC8 mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

    “ABCC8 | AD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    HNF1B mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

    “HNF1B | AD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    KCNJ11 mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

    “KCNJ11 | AD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    HNF1B-MODY is characterized by atrophy of the pancreas.

    “atrophy of the pancreas”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    High titers of insulin antibodies causing resistance is rare and usually occurs in individuals with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

    “This clinical situation is quite rare and usually occurs in individuals with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [519] Hu, 2018, Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS): a clinical syndrome associated with insulin antibodies induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients, Endocr Connect source

      The Introduction describes sporadic reports of high-titre insulin antibodies, and the ‘Increased insulin resistance and risk of hyperglycaemia’ section associates high titres with insulin resistance. The Conclusion recommends investigating insulin-treated type 2 patients with unexplained glucose problems, but the paper does not establish that this situation usually occurs in type 2 rather than type 1 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    HNF1B-MODY is characterized by hyperuricemia.

    “hyperuricemia”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    INS mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

    “INS | AD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    IPEX syndrome is characterized by autoimmune diabetes.

    “autoimmune diabetes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    EIF2B1 mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

    “EIF2B1 | AD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    Wolcott-Rallison syndrome is characterized by epiphyseal dysplasia.

    “epiphyseal dysplasia”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    6q24-related transient neonatal diabetes mechanisms include UPD6, paternal duplication, or maternal methylation defect.

    “mechanisms include UPD6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    IPEX syndrome is characterized by immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, and enteropathy.

    “immunodysregulation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    GATA6 mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

    “GATA6 | AD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    FOXP3 mutations are X-linked.

    “FOXP3 | X-linked”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    EIF2AK3 mutations are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

    “EIF2AK3 | AR”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    IPEX syndrome is characterized by autoimmune thyroid disease.

    “autoimmune thyroid disease”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    IPEX syndrome is characterized by exfoliative dermatitis.

    “exfoliative”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisecitation
    § Insulin Antibodies

    IPEX syndrome is insulin requiring.

    “insulin requiring”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Analytical Considerations

    Issues of concern for noninvasive glucose measurement remain overmodeling of the calibration data, uncontrolled variations associated with skin, and poor specificity for indirect methods.

    “Issues of concern remain (a) overmodeling of the calibration data, (b) uncontrolled variations associated with skin, and (c) poor specificity for indirect methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Analytical Considerations

    The calibration models for noninvasive glucose systems cannot measure glucose concentrations accurately during subsequent OGTTs, thereby severely limiting clinical utility.

    “The resulting calibration models cannot measure glucose concentrations accurately during subsequent OGTTs, thereby severely limiting clinical utility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    Heise and coworkers concluded that direct measurement of glucose is not possible at the measured wavelength bands and that the system, as described, lacks the ability to produce stable calibration functions required for practical clinical operation.

    “However, Heise and coworkers provide a complete analysis of these measurements and conclude that direct measurement of glucose is not possible at the measured wavelength bands and that the system, as described, lacks the ability to produce stable calibration functions required for practical clinical operation (240).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [240] Vahlsing, 2018, Noninvasive monitoring of blood glucose using color-coded photoplethysmographic images of the illuminated fingertip within the visible and near-infrared range: opportunities and questions, J Diabetes Sci Technol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Early detection of GDM

    The HbA1c concentration at the first prenatal visit identifies risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and diabetes during pregnancy but is less effective for ascertainment of GDM.

    “For example, the HbA 1c concentration at the first prenatal visit identifies risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and diabetes during pregnancy but is less effective for ascertainment of GDM (285,286).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [285] Mañé, 2017, Role of first-trimester Hb1c as a predictor of adverse obstetric outcomes in a multiethnic cohort, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [286] Fong, 2014, Use of hemoglobin A1c as an early predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus, Am J Obstet Gynecol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Use/Rationale

    Although urine glucose is detectable in individuals with grossly increased blood glucose concentrations, it provides no information about blood glucose concentrations below the variable renal glucose threshold (approximately 10 mmol/L [180 mg/dL]).

    “Although urine glucose is detectable in individuals with grossly increased blood glucose concentrations, it provides no information about blood glucose concentrations below the variable renal glucose threshold (approximately 10 mmol/L [180 mg/dL]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The renal glucose threshold is approximately 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL).
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Compared with testing urine ketones, children with type 1 diabetes (and caregivers) were more likely to measure blood ketones during periods of illness, and those randomized to blood ketone testing had almost half the number of emergency department visits or hospitalizations.

    “Compared with testing urine ketones, children with type 1 diabetes (and caregivers) were more likely to measure blood ketones during periods of illness, and those randomized to blood ketone testing had almost half the number of emergency department visits or hospitalizations (302).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [302] Laffel, 2006, Sick day management using blood 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-OHB) compared with urine ketone monitoring reduces hospital visits in young people with T1DM: a randomized clinical trial, Diabet Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Use/Rationale

    The extent of renal concentration of the urine will affect urine glucose concentrations and only average glucose values between voidings are reflected, further minimizing the value of urine glucose determinations.

    “Furthermore, the extent of renal concentration of the urine will affect urine glucose concentrations and only average glucose values between voidings are reflected, further minimizing the value of urine glucose determinations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Preanalytical

    The average yield is 30 to 40 mg DNA from 1 mL of whole blood.

    “The average yield is 30 to 40 mg DNA from 1 mL of whole blood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract

    Diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased concentrations of glucose in venous plasma or increased HbA1c in the blood.

    “Diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased concentrations of glucose in venous plasma or increased hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) in the blood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: HbA1c reflects long-term blood glucose concentrations.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis

    Symptoms of diabetes and a casual plasma glucose >=11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) is diagnostic of diabetes.

    “(c) symptoms of diabetes and a casual (i.e., regardless of the time of the preceding meal) plasma glucose $11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, 1997, Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Screening

    Global estimates are that approximately 50% of people with diabetes are undiagnosed.

    “Global estimates are that approximately 50% of people with diabetes are undiagnosed (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed.2021. Accessed 23 May 2022. Available from https://diabetesatlas.org/idfawp/resource-files/2021/07/IDF_Atlas_10th_Edition_2021.pdf

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis

    Fasting plasma glucose >=7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) is diagnostic of diabetes.

    “The revised criteria comprised (a) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) $7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, 1997, Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Interpretation

    A short turnaround time for glucose analysis is not usually necessary for the diagnosis of diabetes.

    “A short turnaround time for glucose analysis is not usually necessary for the diagnosis of diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    Therapy in participants with type 2 diabetes in the UKPDS was adjusted according to FPG concentrations-BGM was not utilized.

    “Therapy in participants with type 2 diabetes in the UKPDS (52) was adjusted according to FPG concentrations-BGM was not utilized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, 1998, Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33), Lancet source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical

    A very few laboratories (<1%) use glucose dehydrogenase.

    “A very few laboratories (<1%) use glucose dehydrogenase.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] Sacks, 2023, Carbohydrates

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    Using biological variation as the basis for deriving analytical performance characteristics, the following desirable specifications for glucose have been proposed: analytical imprecision #2.4%, bias #2.1%, and total error #6.1%.

    “Using biological variation as the basis for deriving analytical performance characteristics (87), the following desirable specifications for glucose have been proposed (95,96): analytical imprecision #2.4%, bias #2.1%, and total error #6.1%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [87] Fraser, 1999, Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications, Clin Chem source
    • cites [95] Aarsand, 2018, The EuBIVAS: within- and between-subject biological variation data for electrolytes, lipids, urea, uric acid, total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and glucose, Clin Chem source
    • cites [96] González-Lao, 2019, Systematic review of the biological variation data for diabetes related analytes, Clin Chim Acta source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Interpretation

    The proposed 30-min turnaround time is based on suggestions of clinicians and no outcome data have been published that validate this figure.

    “However, this value is based on suggestions of clinicians and no outcome data have been published that validate this figure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical

    No consensus has been achieved on the analytic goals for glucose analysis, although numerous criteria have been proposed.

    “No consensus has been achieved on the analytic goals for glucose analysis, although numerous criteria have been proposed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [87] Fraser, 1999, Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications, Clin Chem source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    Intensive glycemic control can decrease microvascular complications as shown by the DCCT for individuals with type 1 diabetes and by the UKPDS for type 2 diabetes.

    “Intensive glycemic control can decrease microvascular complications as shown by the DCCT for individuals with type 1 (50) diabetes and by the UKPDS for type 2 (52) diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [50] Nathan, 1993, The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, N Engl J Med source
    • cites [52] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, 1998, Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33), Lancet source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    Reference intervals in children are 3.3 to 5.6 mmol/L (60 to 100 mg/dL), similar to the adult range of 4.1 to 5.5 mmol/L (74 to 99 mg/dL).

    “Reference intervals in children are 3.3 to 5.6 mmol/L (60 to 100 mg/dL), similar to the adult range of 4.1 to 5.5 mmol/L (74 to 99 mg/dL) (66).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] Rifai, 2017, Carbohydrates

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Interpretation

    The biological variability within an individual is substantially greater than analytic variability; analytic imprecision makes a negligible contribution to variation in patient results.

    “Thus, the biological variability within an individual is substantially greater than analytic variability; analytic imprecision makes a negligible contribution to variation in patient results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    BGM and CGM can be useful for detecting asymptomatic hypoglycemia and allowing people to avoid severe hypoglycemic episodes, especially when insulin is used in treatment.

    “BGM and CGM can be useful for detecting asymptomatic hypoglycemia and allowing people to avoid severe hypoglycemic episodes, especially when insulin is used in treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical

    Analytical bias and/or imprecision at low concentrations can lead to frequent false alarms of neonatal hypoglycemia or missed cases of true hypoglycemia.

    “Analytical bias and/or imprecision at low concentrations can lead to frequent false alarms of neonatal hypoglycemia or missed cases of true hypoglycemia (134).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134] Inman, 2021, Contribution of glucose meter error to misclassification of neonatal glycemic status, JAMA Pediatr source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    Frequent use of BGM (or CGM) is particularly important for tight glycemic control and avoidance of frequent hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.

    “Frequent use of BGM (or CGM) is particularly important for tight glycemic control and avoidance of frequent hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    The risk of hypoglycemia is seen primarily in individuals treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues, and risk increases significantly when pharmacologic therapy is directed toward maintaining glucose concentrations close to those found in individuals without diabetes.

    “The risk of hypoglycemia is seen primarily in individuals treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues, and risk increases significantly when pharmacologic therapy is directed toward maintaining glucose concentrations close to those found in individuals without diabetes (52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, 1998, Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33), Lancet source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    Recurrent education at clinic visits and comparison of BGM with concurrent laboratory glucose analysis have been shown to improve the accuracy of BGM.

    “Recurrent education at clinic visits and comparison of BGM with concurrent laboratory glucose analysis have been shown to improve the accuracy of BGM (116).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [116] Kabadi, 1994, The effect of recurrent practice at home on the acceptability of capillary blood glucose readings. Accuracy of self blood glucose testing, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    Many individuals with diabetes, particularly those with type 1, lose the autonomic warning symptoms that normally precede neuroglycopenia (hypoglycemia unawareness), increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

    “Furthermore, many individuals with diabetes, particularly those with type 1, lose the autonomic warning symptoms that normally precede neuroglycopenia (”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] Gerich, 1991, Hypoglycemia unawareness, Endocr Rev source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical

    High hematocrit will increase or decrease the measured glucose, or will have minimal effect, depending on the design of the measuring system.

    “High hematocrit will increase or decrease the measured glucose, or will have minimal effect, depending on the design of the measuring system (132,133).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [132] Warner, 2011, Can one point-of-care glucose meter be used for all pediatric and adult hospital patients? Evaluation of three meters, including recently modified test strips, Diabetes Technol Ther source
    • cites [133] Ceriotti, 2015, Comparative performance assessment of point-of-care testing devices for measuring glucose and ketones at the patient bedside, J Diabetes Sci Technol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    The incidence of major hypoglycemic episodes requiring third-party help or medical intervention was two- to threefold higher in the intensive group than in the conventional group in clinical trials of participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with the absolute rate far higher in type 1 diabetes than in type 2.

    “The incidence of major hypoglycemic episodes-requiring third-party help or medical interventionwas two-to threefold higher in the intensive group than in the conventional group in clinical trials of participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with the absolute rate far higher in type 1 diabetes than in type 2 (52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, 1998, Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33), Lancet source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Monitoring/Prognosis

    Hypoglycemia is a major risk in treatment of diabetes, and BGM or CGM may help to detect and avoid this potentially life-threatening complication.

    “Hypoglycemia is a major risk in treatment of diabetes, and BGM or CGM may help to detect and avoid this potentially life-threatening complication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interferences

    Hematocrit affects the glucose results of some meters, with falsely high glucose results at low hematocrits and falsely low results at high hematocrits.

    “Hematocrit affects the glucose results of some meters, with falsely high glucose results at low hematocrits and falsely low results at high hematocrits (143,144).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [143] Wada, 2015, Evaluation of two glucose meters and interference corrections for screening neonatal hypoglycemia, Pediatr Int source
    • cites [144] Demircik, 2015, Evaluation of hematocrit interference with MyStar extra and seven competitive devices, J Diabetes Sci Technol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    In a large trial of rt-CGM in people with type 1 diabetes showing significant reductions in HbA 1c in adults, improved glucose control was not seen in children (ages 8 to 14 years) or adolescents and young adults (ages 15 to 24 years).

    “In a large trial of rt-CGM in people with type 1 diabetes showing significant reductions in HbA 1c in adults (159), improved glucose control was not seen in children (ages 8 to 14 years) or adolescents and young adults (ages 15 to 24 years).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [159] Tamborlane, 2008, Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes, N Engl J Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    One RCT showed less time in the hypoglycemic range, without significant change in HbA 1c.

    “One RCT showed less time in the hypoglycemic range, without significant change in HbA 1c (163).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [163] Bolinder, 2016, Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial, Lancet source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Professional CGM, along with professional interpretation, patient education, and therapy adjustments, may help reduce hyper-and/or hypoglycemia, but rigorous data are lacking.

    “Professional CGM, along with professional interpretation, patient education, and therapy adjustments, may help reduce hyper-and/or hypoglycemia, but rigorous data are lacking (105).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [105] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, 7. Diabetes technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS Description/Introduction/ Terminology

    With increasing prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in women of childbearing age, the definition of gestational diabetes mellitus changed to exclude diabetes found by standard nonpregnancy criteria at an early prenatal visit.

    “However, with increasing prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in women of childbearing age, the definition changed to exclude diabetes found (by standard nonpregnancy criteria) at an early prenatal visit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    A few years later a two-step approach was advocated, in which a screening 50-g glucose challenge test was introduced to rule out women who would not need a full OGTT; only women who failed the screening test went on to an OGTT.

    “A few years later a two-step approach was advocated, in which a screening 50-g glucose challenge test was introduced to rule out women who would not need a full OGTT; only women who failed the screening test went on to an OGTT (250).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [250] Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, 2018, ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: gestational diabetes mellitus, Obstet Gynecol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    Using the IADPSG criteria substantially increases the incidence of GDM, mainly because only one increased glucose value is required to diagnose GDM rather than two.

    “Using the IADPSG criteria substantially increases the incidence of GDM, mainly because only one increased glucose value is required to diagnose GDM rather than two.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [258] Metzger, 2010, International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    The original O'Sullivan and Mahan diagnostic criteria were based on blood glucose values in a 3-h 100-g OGTT predictive of later risk of diabetes mellitus in the women.

    “The original O'Sullivan and Mahan diagnostic criteria were based on blood glucose values in a 3-h 100-g OGTT predictive of later risk of diabetes mellitus in the women (252).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [252] O’Sullivan, 1964, Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy, Diabetes

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    In 2013 a NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement recommended that the two-step approach for detection and diagnosis of GDM, predominately used in the U.S., should continue to be used rather than the 1-step approach and criteria proposed by IADPSG.

    “In 2013 a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference Statement recommended that the two-step approach for detection and diagnosis of GDM, predominately used in the U.S., should continue to be used rather than the 1-step approach and criteria proposed by IADPSG (253,254).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [253] Vandorsten, 2013, NIH consensus development conference: diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus, NIH Consens State Sci Statements

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [254] Anonymous, 2013, NIH consensus development conference statement: diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus, March 4-6, 2013, Obstet Gynecol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening/Diagnosis

    In 2014 the ADA acknowledged that consensus had not been reached concerning detection and diagnosis of GDM and endorsed the use of either the 1-step or the 2-step approach.

    “In 2014 the ADA acknowledged that consensus had not been reached concerning detection and diagnosis of GDM and endorsed the use of either the 1-step or the 2-step approach (260).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [260] American Diabetes Association, 2014, Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    The diagnostic thresholds for GDM, especially for FPG, are substantially lower than those for diabetes, i.e., 92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) or 95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) by IADPSG or Carpenter-Coustan criteria, respectively.

    “The diagnostic thresholds for GDM, especially for FPG, are substantially lower than those for diabetes i.e., 92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) or 95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) by IADPSG or Carpenter-Coustan criteria, respectively (Table 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 7

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Monitoring/Prognosis Blood Glucose.

    Insulin-independent glucose uptake by the fetus and placenta leads to lower fasting glucose values, while diabetogenic placental hormones produce postprandial hyperglycemia and carbohydrate intolerance.

    “Insulinindependent glucose uptake by the fetus and placenta leads to lower fasting glucose values, while diabetogenic placental hormones produce postprandial hyperglycemia and carbohydrate intolerance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Use/Rationale

    Urine glucose monitoring is supported by the IDF in situations where blood glucose monitoring is not accessible or affordable, particularly in resource-poor settings.

    “Notwithstanding these limitations, urine glucose monitoring is supported by the IDF in situations where blood glucose monitoring is not accessible or affordable, particularly in resource-poor settings (296).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [296] IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force, 2006, Global guideline for type 2 diabetes: recommendations for standard, comprehensive, and minimal care, Diabet Med source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    Commercially available urine glucose strips use the glucose oxidase reaction.

    “Commercially available strips use the glucose oxidase reaction (89).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] Fraser, 1990, The necessity of achieving good laboratory performance, Diabet Med source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Toward a Consensus on Detection and Diagnosis

    Based on analysis of OGTT results from the Danish Odense Cohort Study, McIntyre et al. have questioned the universal use of the value ≥92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) as the FPG threshold for a diagnosis of GDM by the IADPSG and WHO criteria for GDM.

    “Based on analysis of OGTT results from the Danish Odense Cohort Study (289,290), McIntyre et al. (289) have questioned the universal use of the value $92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) as the FPG threshold for a diagnosis of GDM by the IADPSG (258) and WHO (259) criteria for GDM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [289] McIntyre, 2018, Gestational diabetes mellitus: does one size fit all? A challenge to uniform worldwide diagnostic thresholds, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [290] Kyhl, 2015, The Odense Child Cohort: aims, design, and cohort profile, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol source
    • cites [258] Metzger, 2010, International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [259] Colagiuri, 2014, Strategies for implementing the WHO diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A (moderate)

    Laboratories that measure HbA1c need to have a CLIA certificate, be inspected, and meet the CLIA quality standards.

    “In contrast to POCT, laboratories that measure HbA 1c need to have a CLIA certificate, be inspected, and meet the CLIA quality standards (326).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [326] U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services . CLIA brochures. Accessed 26 August 2022. Available from https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/CLIA_Brochures

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A (moderate)

    CLIA quality standards for HbA1c measurement include specified personnel requirements and participation three times per year in an approved proficiency testing program.

    “These standards include specified personnel requirements (including documented annual competency assessments) and participation three times per year in an approved proficiency testing program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [326] U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services . CLIA brochures. Accessed 26 August 2022. Available from https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/CLIA_Brochures

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Traceability of HbA 1c Methods.

    Intraindividual coefficients of variation in healthy people are very small (<2%), and many current assay methods can achieve intralaboratory CVs <1.5% and interlaboratory CVs <2.0% among different laboratories using the same method.

    “Intraindividual CVs in healthy people are very small (<2%), and many current assay methods can achieve intralaboratory CVs <1.5% and interlaboratory CVs <2.0% among different laboratories using the same method (366).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [366] Sacks, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Traceability of HbA 1c Methods.

    Analysis by the IFCC method is performed by cleaving hemoglobin with endoproteinase Glu-C and separating the resulting glycated and nonglycated N-terminal beta-chain hexapeptides by HPLC.

    “Analysis is performed by cleaving hemoglobin with endoproteinase Glu-C and separating the resulting glycated and nonglycated N-terminal b-chain hexapeptides by HPLC (363).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [363] Hoelzel, 2004, IFCC reference system for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the national standardization schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: a method-comparison study, Clin Chem source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § GENETIC MARKERS Description/Introduction/ Terminology

    These HLA haplotypes are common in the general population and confer increased risk but are not causative for type 1 diabetes.

    “These haplotypes are common in the general population and confer increased risk but are not causative for type 1 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Global Harmonization of HbA 1c Testing and Uniform Reporting of Results

    The NGSP has largely succeeded in standardizing the GHb assay across methods and laboratories.

    “As noted above, the NGSP has largely succeeded in standardizing the GHb assay across methods and laboratories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Global Harmonization of HbA 1c Testing and Uniform Reporting of Results

    The IFCC reference method, which provides reference materials for manufacturers, is being implemented worldwide.

    “Furthermore, the IFCC reference method, which provides reference materials for manufacturers, is being implemented worldwide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Diagnosis/Screening Type 1 Diabetes.

    HLA typing is useful for clinical research studies, either in subjects followed from birth or children identified by autoantibody screening of relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes.

    “However, HLA typing is useful for clinical research studies, either in subjects followed from birth or children identified by autoantibody screening of relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Removal of Labile GHb. Formation of HbA 1c includes an intermediate Schiff base which is called pre-A1C or labile A1C (368).

    Labile A1C is formed rapidly with hyperglycemia and could interfere with some HbA1c assay methods if not completely removed or separated.

    “This material is formed rapidly with hyperglycemia and could interfere with some HbA 1c assay methods if not completely removed or separated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [368] Goldstein, 1980, Effects of acute changes in blood glucose on HbA1c, Diabetes source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Diagnosis/Screening Type 1 Diabetes.

    HLA molecules are genetic etiological factors in the initiation phase of autoimmune diabetes but not during pathogenesis.

    “Therefore, HLA molecules are genetic etiological factors in the initiation phase of autoimmune diabetes but not during pathogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Considerations

    Four major genetic forms of MODY have been identified and individuals at risk within MODY pedigrees can be identified through genetic means.

    “Four major genetic forms of MODY have been identified (Table 8) and individuals at risk within MODY pedigrees can be identified through genetic means.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Interpretation

    People at the highest genetic risk of type 1 diabetes are those in whom all four DQ combinations meet this criterion.

    “People at the highest genetic risk of type 1 diabetes are those in whom all four DQ combinations meet this criterion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Interpretation

    HLA-DQ genes appear to be central to the HLA-associated risk of type 1 diabetes, albeit DR genes may be independently involved.

    “HLA-DQ genes appear to be central to the HLA-associated risk of type 1 diabetes, albeit DR genes may be independently involved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Preanalytical

    Blood samples should be drawn into test tubes containing EDTA and the DNA preparations should be harvested within 3 days; longer periods both lower the yield and degrade the quality of the DNA obtained.

    “Blood samples should be drawn into test tubes containing EDTA and the DNA preparations should be harvested within 3 days; longer periods both lower the yield and degrade the quality of the DNA obtained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Considerations

    There are over 60 distinct genetic disorders associated with glucose intolerance or frank diabetes.

    “There are over 60 distinct genetic disorders associated with glucose intolerance or frank diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Preanalytical

    DNA samples are best kept at -80 C in Tris-EDTA solution, where the integrity of the sample lasts virtually indefinitely.

    “DNA samples are best kept at À80 C in Tris-EDTA solution, where the integrity of the sample lasts virtually indefinitely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § AUTOIMMUNE MARKERS Description/Introduction/ Terminology

    The islet autoantibodies are directed against insulin (IAA), GAD65 (GADA), insulinoma-associated antigen 2 (IA-2A), or zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) and predict type 1 diabetes.

    “The islet autoantibodies are directed against insulin (IAA), GAD65 (GADA), insulinoma-associated antigen 2 (IA-2A), or zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) and predict type 1 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Diagnosis

    Insulin treatment precludes the analysis of IAA as it takes only about 11 days before insulin antibodies are induced.

    “Insulin treatment precludes the analysis of IAA as it takes only about 11 days before insulin antibodies are induced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    The risk of type 1 diabetes in HLA-identical siblings of a proband with type 1 diabetes is 1 in 4, while siblings who have HLA-haplotype identity have a 1 in 12 risk and those with no shared haplotype a 1 in 100 risk.

    “The risk of type 1 diabetes in HLA-identical siblings of a proband with type 1 diabetes is 1 in 4, while siblings who have HLA-haplotype identity have a 1 in 12 risk and those with no shared haplotype a 1 in 100 risk (403).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [403] Pociot, 2016, Genetic risk factors for type 1 diabetes, Lancet source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Diagnosis

    After years of type 1 diabetes, the autoantibodies tend to fall below detection limits, but GADA usually remains increased.

    “After years of type 1 diabetes, the autoantibodies tend to fall below detection limits, but GADA usually remains increased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Diagnosis

    The ensuing autoimmunity may be present for months or years prior to the appearance of two or more islet autoantibodies without either dysglycemia or symptoms (Stage 1) and the subsequent development of dysglycemia (Stage 2), followed by the onset of hyperglycemia and symptoms of diabetes (Stage 3).

    “The ensuing autoimmunity may be present for months or years prior to the appearance of two or more islet autoantibodies without either dysglycemia or symptoms (Stage 1) and the subsequent development of dysglycemia (Stage 2), followed by the onset of hyperglycemia and symptoms of diabetes (Stage 3) (see Table 9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Diagnosis

    As many as 1 in 4 females with type 1 diabetes have autoimmune thyroid disease while 1 in 280 individuals develop adrenal autoantibodies and adrenal insufficiency.

    “As many as 1 in 4 females with type 1 diabetes have autoimmune thyroid disease while 1 in 280 individuals develop adrenal autoantibodies and adrenal insufficiency (419).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [419] Nederstigt, 2019, Associated auto-immune disease in type 1 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur J Endocrinol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Considerations

    ICA is determined by indirect immunofluorescence on frozen sections of human pancreas.

    “ICA is determined by indirect immunofluorescence on frozen sections of human pancreas (436).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [436] Gleichmann, 1987, Progress toward standardization of cytoplasmic islet cell-antibody assay, Diabetes source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening

    Children with certain HLA-DQB1 alleles such as B1*06:02, B1*06:03, or B1*03:01 are mostly protected from type 1 diabetes but not from developing islet autoantibodies or from type 1 diabetes later in life.

    “Children with certain HLA-DQB1 alleles such as B1*06:02, B1*06:03, or B1*03:01 are mostly protected from type 1 diabetes but not from developing islet autoantibodies (424) or from type 1 diabetes later in life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [424] Schott, 1994, GAD65 autoantibodies increase the predictability but not the sensitivity of islet cell and insulin autoantibodies for developing insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, J Autoimmun source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Screening

    The risk of developing type 1 diabetes in relatives of someone with the disease is approximately 5%, which is 15-fold higher than the risk in the general population (1 in 250 to 300 lifetime risk).

    “The risk of developing type 1 diabetes in relatives of someone with the disease is approximately 5%, which is 15-fold higher than the risk in the general population (1 in 250 to 300 lifetime risk).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Interpretation

    A panel of IAA, GADA, IA-2A/IA-2bA, and ZnT8A autoantibodies can be used in screening studies.

    “Since immunoassays for IAA, GADA, IA-2A/IA-2bA, and ZnT8A are available, a panel of these autoantibodies can be used in screening studies (447).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [447] Skyler, 2005, Effects of oral insulin in relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Trial—Type 1, Diabetes Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Considerations

    Positive results depend upon the study or context in which they are used, but many laboratories use 10 JDF units determined on two separate occasions, or a single result ≥20 JDF units, as significant titers which may convey an increased risk of type 1 diabetes.

    “Positive results depend upon the study or context in which they are used, but many laboratories use 10 JDF units determined on two separate occasions, or a single result $20 JDF units, as significant titers which may convey an increased risk of type 1 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening

    Approximately 5% to 10% of White adults who present with a type 2 diabetes phenotype have islet autoantibodies, particularly GADA, which predict insulin dependency.

    “Approximately 5% to 10% of White adults who present with a type 2 diabetes phenotype have islet autoantibodies (425), particularly GADA, which predict insulin dependency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [425] Turner, 1997, UKPDS 25: autoantibodies to islet-cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes, Lancet source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Interpretation

    IA-2A may be present in about 40% to 80% of those newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, but the frequency is highest in the young and decreases with increasing age at onset.

    “IA-2A may be present in about 40% to 80% of those newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, but the frequency is highest in the young and decreases with increasing age at onset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Interpretation

    ICA is found in about 75% to 85% of people with new-onset type 1 diabetes.

    “ICA is found in about 75% to 85% of people with newonset type 1 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Interpretation

    GADA may be present in 60% to 80% of people newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, but the frequency varies with gender and age.

    “GADA may be present in 60% to 80% of people newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, but the frequency varies with gender and age.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Screening

    Although individuals who are GADA positive progress to absolute insulinopenia faster than do those who are autoantibody negative, some autoantibody-negative adults with type 2 diabetes also progress (albeit more slowly) to insulin dependence with time.

    “Although individuals who are GADA positive progress to absolute insulinopenia faster than do those who are autoanti-body negative, some autoantibody-negative adults with type 2 diabetes also progress (albeit more slowly) to insulin dependence with time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Interpretation

    Strategies of requiring autoantibody assay specificity >99%, documented proficiency testing, multiple autoantibody assays, and sequential measurement will reduce both false-positive and false-negative results.

    “These strategies will reduce both false-positive and -negative results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Interpretation

    IAAs are positive in more than 70% to 80% of children who develop type 1 diabetes before age 5 years but in fewer than 40% of individuals developing diabetes after age 12.

    “IAAs are positive in more than 70% to 80% of children who develop type 1 diabetes before age 5 years but in fewer than 40% of individuals developing diabetes after age 12.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § URINE ALBUMIN Description/Introduction/ Terminology

    The KDIGO group reclassified albuminuria in 2020, and these definitions have been adopted by the ADA.

    “The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group, representing international guidelines for kidney disease, reclassified albuminuria in 2020 (450), and these definitions have been adopted by the ADA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [450] Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group, 2020, KDIGO 2020 Clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease, Kidney Int source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Emerging Considerations and Knowledge Gaps/Research Needs

    Trials in relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes are more economical than trials in the general population because islet autoantibody positivity rates are lower in the general population.

    “Islet autoantibody positivity rates are distinctly lower in the general population than in relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes, so that trials in the latter group are more economical.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Excessive albumin excretion in the urine is directly related to future loss of kidney function and increased cardiovascular risk.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Monitoring

    SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone slow the rate of urine albumin excretion or prevent its development by reducing inflammation and decreasing intraglomerular pressure.

    “These agents slow the rate of urine albumin excretion or prevent its development by reducing inflammation and decreasing intraglomerular pressure, reflected in a small reduction in eGFR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Diagnosis/Screening

    Decreasing albuminuria by at least 30% lowers cardiovascular risk and events and slows CKD progression.

    “Decreasing albuminuria by at least 30% lowers cardiovascular risk and events and slows CKD progression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    Albumin concentration decreased by 0.27% per day at -20 C but showed no decrease over 160 days at -80 C.

    “Whether centrifuged, filtered, or not treated, albumin concentration decreased by 0.27% per day at À20 C but showed no decrease over 160 days at À80 C (496).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [496] MacNeil, 1991, Considerations when measuring urinary albumin: precision, substances that may interfere, and conditions for sample storage, Clin Chem source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    In healthy volunteers, the lowest CVi was observed for albumin concentration in the first morning void (36%) and for the albumin-to-creatinine ratio in that sample (31%).

    “In healthy volunteers, the lowest CVi was observed for the albumin concentration in the first morning void (36%) and for the albuminto-creatinine ratio in that sample (31%) (491).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [491] Howey, 1989, Biologic variation of urinary albumin: consequences for analysis, specimen collection, interpretation of results, and screening programs, Am J Kidney Dis source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Frequency of Measurement

    An individual can have as much as 40% to 50% variability in albumin excretion.

    “Uncommonly, an individual can have as much as 40% to 50% variability in albumin excretion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Prognosis

    Approximately 20% of people with diabetes develop end-stage kidney disease and almost all will have severely increased albuminuria despite achievement of blood pressure goals.

    “Approximately 20% develop end-stage kidney disease and almost all will have severely increased albuminuria despite achievement of blood pressure goals (484).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [484] Duka, 2008, Influence of microalbuminuria in achieving blood pressure goals, Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    Urine albumin excretion rate reportedly has no marked diurnal variation in diabetes but does in essential hypertension.

    “Urine albumin excretion rate reportedly has no marked diurnal variation in diabetes but does in essential hypertension (497).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [497] Hishiki, 1998, Circadian variation of urinary microalbumin excretion and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension, J Hypertens source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    The within-individual variation of albumin excretion is large in people without diabetes and is moderately increased in people with diabetes.

    “The within-individual variation (CVi) of albumin excretion is large in people without diabetes and is moderately increased in people with diabetes (489).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [489] Miller, 2009, Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion, Clin Chem source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Preanalytical

    The albumin-to-creatinine ratio correlates well with both timed excretion and albumin concentration in a first morning void of urine.

    “The ratio correlates well with both timed excretion and albumin concentration in a first morning void of urine (489,491).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [489] Miller, 2009, Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion, Clin Chem source
    • cites [491] Howey, 1989, Biologic variation of urinary albumin: consequences for analysis, specimen collection, interpretation of results, and screening programs, Am J Kidney Dis source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Frequency of Measurement

    A >30% sustained reduction in albuminuria is accepted as a surrogate marker of slowed progression of kidney disease at the group level.

    “Additionally, a >30% sustained reduction in albuminuria is accepted as a surrogate marker of slowed progression of kidney disease at the group level, e.g., in a clinical trial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Interpretation

    Taken together, these data support semiquantitative uACR dipstick testing as a useful approach when quantitative analysis is not possible.

    “Taken together, these data support semiquantitative uACR dipstick testing as a useful approach when quantitative analysis is not possible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Interpretation

    Advantages of semiquantitative testing include relatively high specificity and use as point-of-care testing which, if appropriately implemented, can improve access and eliminate the need for shipping samples and delays in getting a test result.

    “Advantages of semiquantitative testing include relatively high specificity and use as point-of-care testing which, if appropriately implemented, can improve access (particularly in resourcelimited settings) and eliminate the need for shipping samples and delays in getting a test result.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Interpretation

    At least some semiquantitative POC methods have the wrong characteristics for screening because they exhibit low sensitivity and positive results must be confirmed by a laboratory method.

    “At least some of the semiquantitative POC methods have the wrong characteristics for screening because they exhibit low sensitivity and positive results must be confirmed by a laboratory method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Semiquantitative or Qualitative.

    Clinical operators have lower sensitivity but better specificity than laboratory technologists.

    “Clinical operators have a lower sensitivity but better specificity than laboratory technologists (500)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [500] McTaggart, 2014, Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care tests for detecting albuminuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ann Intern Med source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Insulin Antibodies

    A quantitative estimate of the concentration of circulating insulin antibodies does not appear to be of significant benefit.

    “There are several therapeutic approaches for treating these individuals, and a quantitative estimate of the concentration of circulating insulin antibodies does not appear to be of significant benefit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
178 of 178
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HbA1c reflects long-term blood glucose concentrations.

    “recommended that diabetes could also be diagnosed by measurement of hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), which reflects long-term blood glucose concentrations”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The correlation between interstitial and blood glucose concentrations is usually high.

    “CGM devices have not been approved for use in hospitalized patients, in part due to concerns about accuracy, concomitant medication use, or theoretical alterations in the usually high correlation between interstitial and blood glucose concentrations caused by serious illness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus is totally dependent on accurate measurement of glucose.

    “The diagnosis of GDM is totally dependent on accurate measurement of glucose.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The renal glucose threshold is approximately 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL).

    “it provides no information about blood glucose concentrations below the variable renal glucose threshold (approximately 10 mmol/L [180 mg/dL])”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Urine test reagents deteriorate with exposure to air, giving false-negative readings.

    “Urine test reagents deteriorate with exposure to air, giving false-negative readings; testing material should be stored in tightly sealed containers and discarded after the expiration date on the manufacturer's label.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    False-negative readings occur with highly acidic urine specimens, such as after large intakes of ascorbic acid.

    “False-negative readings have also been reported with highly acidic urine specimens, such as after large intakes of ascorbic acid.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Loss of ketones from urine attributable to microbial action can cause false-negative readings.

    “Loss of ketones from urine attributable to microbial action can also cause false-negative readings.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Acetone is a highly volatile substance.

    “Since acetone is a highly volatile substance, specimens should be kept in a closed container.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nitroprusside method measures only acetoacetate unless the reagent contains glycine, in which case acetone is also measured.

    “The nitroprusside method measures only AcAc unless the reagent contains glycine, in which case acetone is also measured.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nitroprusside-containing reagent is much more sensitive to acetoacetate than acetone with respect to color generation.

    “The nitroprussidecontaining reagent is much more sensitive to AcAc than acetone with respect to color generation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Resolution of acidosis or reduction in blood beta-hydroxybutyrate is traditionally the marker for successful treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis, rather than serial measurement of ketones by the nitroprusside reaction.

    “Resolution of acidosis or reduction in blood bOHB is traditionally the marker for successful treatment of DKA, rather than serial measurement of ketones by the nitroprusside reaction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in healthy individuals fasted overnight are generally less than 0.5 mmol/L.

    “bOHB reference intervals differ among assay methods, but concentrations in healthy individuals fasted overnight are generally <0.5 mmol/L.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Glycated hemoglobin usually indicates the average glucose concentration over the preceding 60 to 90 days.

    “Hemoglobin in the RBC has an average circulating life span of approximately 120 days, and glycated hemoglobin therefore usually indicates the average glucose concentration over the preceding 60 to 90 days.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The clinical utility of glycated proteins other than hemoglobin has not been clearly established.

    “However, the clinical utility of glycated proteins other than hemoglobin has not been clearly established.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HbA1c results are not significantly affected by acute fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations, such as those that occur with illness or after meals.

    “HbA 1c results are not significantly affected by acute fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations, such as those that occur with illness or after meals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Boronate affinity chromatographic assay methods are generally considered to be less affected by hemoglobin variants than other methods.

    “Boronate affinity chromatographic assay methods are generally considered to be less affected by hemoglobin variants than other methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HbA1c cannot be measured in individuals with homozygous hemoglobin variants or two variant hemoglobins, like HbSC; they have no HbA and therefore do not have HbA1c.

    “It is important to emphasize that HbA 1c cannot be measured in individuals with homozygous hemoglobin variants (e.g., HbSS, HbCC, HbEE) or 2 variant hemoglobins, like HbSC; they have no HbA and therefore do not have HbA 1c .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For most methods, whole blood samples stored at -70 C or colder are stable long term (at least 1 year), but specimens are not as stable at -20 C.

    “For most methods, whole blood samples stored at À70 C or colder are stable long term (at least 1 year), but specimens are not as stable at À20 C.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are more than 300 HbA1c assay methods in current clinical use.

    “There are >300 HbA 1c assay methods in current clinical use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two IFCC methods use the same primary reference materials and the results are essentially identical.

    “The two methods use the same primary reference materials and the results are essentially identical.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The preparation and measurement of samples using the IFCC method is laborious, expensive, and time-consuming and was never envisioned as a practical means of assaying clinical samples.

    “Of note, the preparation and measurement of samples using this method is laborious, expensive, and time-consuming and was never envisioned as a practical means of assaying clinical samples.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Currently available automated assays either remove the labile pre-HbA1c during the assay process or do not measure the labile product.

    “Currently available automated assays either remove the labile pre-HbA 1c during the assay process or do not measure the labile product.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HbA1c values in people with diabetes are a continuum, ranging from within the nondiabetic reference interval in a small percentage of people to markedly increased values in some individuals.

    “HbA 1c values in people with diabetes are a continuum; they range from within the nondiabetic reference interval in a small percentage of people whose mean plasma glucose concentrations are close to those of individuals without diabetes, to markedly increased values, e.g., two-to threefold higher levels than the nondiabetic mean of approximately 5%, in some individuals, reflecting extreme hypergly”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 1 diabetes results from a selective autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic b-cell functional mass, eventually leading to an absolute lack of insulin and consequent hyperglycemia.

    “Type 1 diabetes results from a selective autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic b-cell functional mass, eventually leading to an absolute lack of insulin and consequent hyperglycemia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 1 diabetes is genetically linked to HLA of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6.

    “Type 1 diabetes is genetically linked to HLA of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 1 or autoimmune diabetes is strongly associated with HLA DR and DQ genes.

    “Type 1 or autoimmune diabetes is strongly associated with HLA DR and DQ genes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mutation detection for MODY is technically feasible.

    “Mutation detection for MODY is technically feasible.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes is strongly associated with several immune abnormalities most prominently islet autoantibodies but also cooccurrence of other organ-specific autoimmune diseases such as autoimmune thyroid disease and celiac disease.

    “The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes is strongly associated with several immune abnormalities most prominently islet autoantibodies but also cooccurrence of other organ-specific autoimmune diseases such as autoimmune thyroid disease and celiac disease.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The clinical onset of type 1 diabetes is related to the loss of the functional b-cell mass.

    “The clinical onset of type 1 diabetes is related to the loss of the functional b-cell mass.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Insulin treatment precludes the analysis of IAA as it takes only about 11 days before insulin antibodies are induced.

    “Insulin treatment precludes the analysis of IAA as it takes only about 11 days before insulin antibodies are induced.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Islet autoantibodies are found in the general population.

    “Islet autoantibodies are found in the general population.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Excessive albumin excretion in the urine is directly related to future loss of kidney function and increased cardiovascular risk.

    “it is well known that excessive albumin excretion in the urine is directly related to future loss of kidney function and increased cardiovascular risk”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The onset of type 2 diabetes is difficult to date precisely.

    “the difficulty in precisely dating the onset of type 2 diabetes”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Race is a social, not biologic, construct.

    “race is a social, not biologic, construct”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clear inequities occur with use of race-based equations for eGFR.

    “clear inequities occur with use of race-based equations for eGFR”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cystatin C assays are not widely available in the U.S.

    “cystatin C assays are not widely available in the U.S.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Insulin resistance plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.

    “Due to the critical role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Accurate measurement of insulin resistance requires complex methods generally confined to research laboratories.

    “accurate measurement of insulin resistance requires the use of complex methods, such as the hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic clamp technique, which are generally confined to research laboratories”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical operators do not wait the full time between dipping and scanning.

    “perhaps because they do not wait the full time (usually 60 s) between dipping and scanning”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Effective screening tests have low false-negative rates.

    “Effective screening tests (e.g., for phenylketonuria) have low false-negative rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The normal rate of GFR loss is about 0.8 mL/min/year in diabetes.

    “the normal rate of GFR loss is about 0.8 mL/min/year in diabetes”
41 of 41

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic disorders of carbohydrate metabolism in which glucose is both underutilized as an energy source and overproduced due to inappropriate gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, resulting in hyperglycemia.

    “Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic disorders of carbohydrate metabolism in which glucose is both underutilized as an energy source and overproduced due to inappropriate gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, resulting in hyperglycemia (1).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Abstract states that diabetes involves disordered carbohydrate metabolism in which glucose is underutilized and overproduced, resulting in hyperglycemia. It does not specify underutilization as an energy source or attribute overproduction to inappropriate gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis; a search for those mechanisms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CGMs measure interstitial fluid glucose that has diffused from capillaries into subcutaneous tissue and may indicate a falsely low blood glucose due to device compression, device calibration errors, and skin/soft tissue infections.

    “These devices measure interstitial fluid glucose that has diffused from the capillaries and into the subcutaneous tissue and may indicate a falsely low BG due to device compression, device calibration errors, and skin/soft tissue infections [4,6,7].”

    From Non-Diabetic Hypoglycemia: Evaluation and Management in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Continuous Glucose Monitoring Description/Introduction/Terminology section says CGMs measure interstitial glucose using a sensor under the skin, and Analytical Considerations advises checking readings that appear inaccurate. Our copy does not link falsely low readings to device compression, calibration errors, or skin and soft-tissue infections; searches for those causes found no supporting passage. It also does not describe glucose diffusing from capillaries into the subcutaneous tissue. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A1C may not be a suitable diagnostic test in people with anemia, people treated with erythropoietin, or people undergoing hemodialysis or HIV treatment.

    “A1C may not be a suitable diagnostic test in people with anemia, people treated with erythropoietin, or people undergoing hemodialysis or HIV treatment (1,19,20).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The 'Other Patient-Related Factors and Interfering Factors' section (page unavailable) says altered red-blood-cell turnover can make HbA1c results spurious and require glucose testing for diagnosis; it specifically discusses hemolytic and iron-deficiency anemia. The passages found do not address erythropoietin treatment, hemodialysis, or HIV treatment as reasons A1C may be unsuitable for diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Glycated albumin and fructosamine, which reflect average glycemia over a shorter time (15-30 days), are helpful in clinical management.

    “Therefore, glycated albumin and fructosamine, which reflect average glycemia over a shorter time (15-30 days), are helpful in clinical management (65,66).”

    From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [66]

    The HEMOGLOBIN A1C Description section says fructosamine and glycated albumin reflect mean glycemia over 15–30 days. But it says their clinical utility has not been clearly established; the section on routine management likewise calls for further studies to determine whether they are clinically useful. The claim that they are helpful in clinical management therefore goes beyond the source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The balance between analytic requirements (e.g., accuracy, precision, and interference) and clinical requirements (e.g., rapidity, simplicity, and POC) has not been uniformly resolved, and most hospitals have arrived at their own policies to balance these parameters.

    “The balance between analytic requirements (e.g., accuracy, precision, and interference) and clinical requirements (e.g., rapidity, simplicity, and POC) has not been uniformly resolved (39)(40)(41)(42), and most hospitals have arrived at their own policies to balance these parameters.”

    From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The stated 5.6 mmol/L interval uses the wrong percentage

    Minor

    A range of 4.9 to 6.3 mmol/L is approximately 5.6 mmol/L ±12.5%, not ±6.4%. Applying 6.4% gives about 5.2 to 6.0 mmol/L.

  • The stated 7.0 mmol/L interval uses the wrong percentage

    Minor

    A range of 6.1 to 7.9 mmol/L is approximately 7.0 mmol/L ±12.9%, not ±6.4%. Applying the stated 6.4% gives about 6.6 to 7.4 mmol/L.

  • The same IFCC value is assigned to two different HbA1c percentages

    Minor

    The reference-interval discussion equates 31 mmol/mol with both 5% and 5.6% HbA1c. Those percentages cannot both represent the same IFCC value.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 535 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ladenson, 1980, Nonanalytical sources of variation in clinical chemistry results, 149
  2. Rifai, 2017, Carbohydrates
  3. Sacks, 2023, Carbohydrates, 353.e1
  4. Sacks, 2023, Diabetes mellitus, 502
  5. Little, 1998, A simple blood collection device for analysis of glycohemoglobin (GHB), Clin Chem, 44, A139
  6. Goldstein, 1997, Bringing order to chaos: the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, Contemp Intern Med, 9, 27
  7. Sacks, 2020, Participant Summary for Hemoglobin A1c Survey 2020 Set GH5-C
  8. Redondo, 2000, DR- and DQ-associated protection from type 1A diabetes: comparison of DRB1*1401 and DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602*, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 85, 3793

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sacks, D. B., Arnold, M., Bakris, G. L., Bruns, D. E., Horvath, A. R., Lernmark, Å., Metzger, B. E., Nathan, D. M., & Kirkman, M. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • American Heart Association (US)
  • University of Virginia Medical Center (US)
  • Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Sacks, David B.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2023-07-20
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
e151-e199
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4384924887
Cited by
351
References
535
Citations by year
2026: 146 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 11
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH Intramural Research Program
  • Swedish Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, diabetes diagnosis, glycemic control monitoring, HbA1c, venous plasma glucose, continuous glucose monitoring, self-monitoring of blood glucose, non-invasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, autoantibodies, urinary albumin, insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review