Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectrophotometric Assay for Complex I of the Respiratory Chain in Tissue Samples and Cultured Fibroblasts

Janssen, Antoon JM, Trijbels, Frans JM, Sengers, Rob CA, Smeitink, Jan AM, van den Heuvel, Lambert P, Wintjes, Liesbeth TM, Stoltenborg-Hogenkamp, Berendien JM, Rodenburg, Richard JT·2007·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: A reliable and sensitive complex I assay is an essential tool for the diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders, but current spectrophotometric assays suffer from low sensitivity, low specificity, or both. This deficiency is mainly due to the poor solubility of coenzyme-Q analogs and reaction mixture turbidity caused by the relatively high concentrations of tissue extract that are often required to measure complex I. Methods: We developed a new spectrophotometric assay to measure complex I in mitochondrial fractions and applied it to muscle and cultured fibroblasts. The method is based on measuring 2,6-dichloroindophenol reduction by electrons accepted from decylubiquinol, reduced after oxidation of NADH by complex I. The assay thus is designed to avoid nonspecific NADH oxidation because electrons produced in these reactions are not accepted by decylubiquinone, resulting in high rotenone sensitivity. Results: The assay was linear with time and amount of mitochondria. The Km values for NADH and 2,6-dichloroindophenol in muscle mitochondria were 0.04 and 0.017 mmol/L, respectively. The highest complex I activities were measured with 0.07 mmol/L decylubiquinone and 3.5 g/L bovine serum albumin. The latter was an essential component of the reaction mixture, increasing the solubility of decylubiquinone and rotenone. In patients with previously diagnosed complex I deficiencies, the new assay detected the complex I deficiencies in both muscle and fibroblasts. Conclusions: This spectrophotometric assay is reproducible, sensitive, and specific for complex I activity because of its high rotenone sensitivity, and it can be applied successfully to the diagnosis of complex I deficiencies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2006.078873

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Janssen, A. J., Trijbels, F. J., Sengers, R. C., Smeitink, J. A., van den Heuvel, L. P., Wintjes, L. T., Stoltenborg-Hogenkamp, B. J., & Rodenburg, R. J.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2007-04-01
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
729-734
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2157999222
Cited by
373
References
12
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrophotometric Assay for Complex I of the Respiratory Chain in Tissue Samples and Cultured Fibroblasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2006.078873
The paper
Janssen, A. J., Trijbels, F. J., Sengers, R. C., Smeitink, J. A., van den Heuvel, L. P., Wintjes, L. T., Stoltenborg-Hogenkamp, B. J., & Rodenburg, R. J. (2007). Spectrophotometric Assay for Complex I of the Respiratory Chain in Tissue Samples and Cultured Fibroblasts. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.078873

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.