Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Role of Monitoring Changes in Sensitive Cardiac Troponin I Assay Results for Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction and Prediction of Risk of Adverse Events

Open access
Apple, Fred S, Pearce, Lesly A, Smith, Stephen W, Kaczmarek, Jason M, Murakami, MaryAnn M·2009·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the cardiac troponin I (cTnI) VITROS® Troponin I-ES assay for early detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and for risk prediction of adverse events in patients with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: cTnI was measured on admission and approximately 6 h postadmission in 381 patients. The 99th percentile cTnI concentration (0.034 μg/L) and change [delta (δ)] between admission and follow-up concentrations were evaluated in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity calculations. Risk of cardiac event or death within 60 days was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: AMI occurred in 52 patients. Diagnostic sensitivities (95% CI) of admission and follow-up cTnIs for AMI were 69% (55%–81%) and 94% (84%–99%), respectively. The corresponding specificities (95% CI) were 78% (73%–82%) and 81% (77%–85%), and ROC curve areas were 0.82 vs 0.96 (P < 0.001). Deltas between admission and follow-up cTnI >30% had a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 61%–86%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI 87%–94%). During follow-up, 1 cardiac death, 2 noncardiac deaths, 52 AMIs, 6 coronary artery bypass grafts, and 43 percutanous coronary interventions occurred in 62 patients. A δ cTnI >30%, when added to either initial cTnI >0.034 μg/L or follow-up cTnI >0.034 μg/L, improved risk stratification for cardiac event or death (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Admission cTnI measured by the VITROS ES assay is a sensitive biomarker for detection of AMI. Utilizing >30% cTnI δ in addition to either the baseline or follow-up concentration improved both specificity and risk assessment in patients presenting with symptoms of ACS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2008.114728

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Apple, F. S., Pearce, L. A., Smith, S. W., Kaczmarek, J. M., & Murakami, M. M.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
930-937
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2098626165
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Monitoring Changes in Sensitive Cardiac Troponin I Assay Results for Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction and Prediction of Risk of Adverse Events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2008.114728
The paper
Apple, F. S., Pearce, L. A., Smith, S. W., Kaczmarek, J. M., & Murakami, M. M. (2009). Role of Monitoring Changes in Sensitive Cardiac Troponin I Assay Results for Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction and Prediction of Risk of Adverse Events. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.114728

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.