Quantitative Clinical Proteomics by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Assessing the Platform
Abstract
Clinical laboratories use electrospray ionization and mass spectrometry (MS)1 every day to measure dozens of different small molecule analytes. The capacity to precisely quantify these biomarkers has improved patient care. To build on the successful implementation of novel MS methodologies, many clinical mass spectrometrists hope to expand the list of measurable analytes to include peptides and proteins, several examples of which have been reported and reviewed (1). One can also envision the translation of novel biomarkers from the research-grade MS assays, with which they are discovered, to clinically acceptable MS assays for diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. An argument can be made that investigators should use clinically acceptable MS assays from the outset (2), which would facilitate the transition from research/discovery to clinical practice. Given the successes over the last few years in precisely measuring proteins by MS in clinically relevant matrices, this outcome may not be too much to ask. Traditionally, the word proteomics has encompassed efforts aimed at simultaneously measuring many proteins in a given complex sample. Shotgun proteomic experiments, which attempt to identify all of the proteins in a complex sample, and targeted proteomic experiments, which attempt to quantify a subset of the proteins known to exist in a complex sample, can both be carried out using liquid chromatography–tandem MS (LC-MS/MS). Shotgun proteomics is alrea…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LC-MS/MS is suitable for highly multiplexed protein quantification and isoform differentiation, including apolipoproteins.
“LC-MS/MS has proven suitable for multiplexed quantification and phenotyping of apolipoproteins.”
From Automated multiplex LC-MS/MS assay for quantifying serum apolipoproteins A-I, B, C-I, C-II, C-III, and E with qualitative apolipoprotein E phenotyping (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van den Broek, I., Romijn, F. P. H. T. M., Nouta, J., van der Laarse, A., Drijfhout, J. W., Smit, N. P. M., van der Burgt, Y. E. M., & Cobbaert, C. M. (2016) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2015.246702 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Strathmann, F. G., Schulte, S., Goerl, K., & Petron, D. J. (2014) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.028 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kinetics of plasma apolipoprotein E isoforms by LC-MS/MS: a pilot study
Blanchard, V., Ramin-Mangata, S., Billon-Crossouard, S., Aguesse, A., Durand, M., Chemello, K., Nativel, B., Flet, L., Chétiveaux, M., Jacobi, D., et al. (2018) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.p083576 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoofnagle, A. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoofnagle, Andrew N
- ORCID
- Hoofnagle, Andrew N
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-164
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2141969501
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Keywords
- clinical proteomics, targeted proteomics, multiple reaction monitoring, isotope dilution, protein quantification, clinical mass spectrometry, clinical laboratory implementation, trypsin digestion, clinical biomarkers, assay validation
- MeSH terms
- Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review