Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reproducibility of Metabolomic Profiles among Men and Women in 2 Large Cohort Studies

Open access
Townsend, Mary K, Clish, Clary B, Kraft, Peter, Wu, Chen, Souza, Amanda L, Deik, Amy A, Tworoger, Shelley S, Wolpin, Brian M·2013·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rigorous studies are necessary to demonstrate suitability of metabolomics platforms to profile metabolites in archived plasma within epidemiologic studies of human disease, for which attenuation of effect estimates due to measurement error is a key concern. METHODS: Using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry platform, we quantified 257 metabolites from archived plasma to evaluate metabolite interassay reproducibility, reproducibility with delayed processing, and within-person reproducibility over time. Interassay reproducibility was assessed with CVs from 60 duplicate plasma samples donated by participants in the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and 20 QC pool plasma replicates. Metabolite reproducibility over a 24- to 48-h processing delay (n = 48 samples) and within-person reproducibility over 1–2 years (n = 80 samples) were assessed using Spearman and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: CVs were <20% for 92% of metabolites and generally were similar by plasma anticoagulant type (heparin or EDTA) and fasting time. Approximately 75% of metabolites were reproducible over delays in processing of blood samples (Spearman correlation or ICC ≥0.75, comparing immediate and 24-h delayed processing). Carbohydrates and purine/pyrimidine derivatives were most adversely affected by the processing delay. Ninety percent of metabolites were reproducible over 1–2 years within individuals (Spearman correlation or ICC ≥0.4). CONCLUSIONS: For potential use in epidemiologic studies, the majority of plasma metabolites had low CVs and were reproducible over a 24-h processing delay and within individuals over 1–2 years. Certain metabolites, such as carbohydrates and purine/pyrimidine derivatives, may be challenging to evaluate if samples have delayed processing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2012.199133

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Townsend, M. K., Clish, C. B., Kraft, P., Wu, C., Souza, A. L., Deik, A. A., Tworoger, S. S., & Wolpin, B. M.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
1657-1667
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2134167892
Cited by
242
References
2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of Metabolomic Profiles among Men and Women in 2 Large Cohort Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2012.199133
The paper
Townsend, M. K., Clish, C. B., Kraft, P., Wu, C., Souza, A. L., Deik, A. A., Tworoger, S. S., & Wolpin, B. M. (2013). Reproducibility of Metabolomic Profiles among Men and Women in 2 Large Cohort Studies. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.199133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.