The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circulating Fetal Cell-Free DNA Fractions Differ in Autosomal Aneuploidies and Monosomy X
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing based on massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has become rapidly integrated into clinical practice for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidy. We directly determined the fetal fraction (FF) from results obtained with MPS tag counting and examined the relationships of FF to such biological parameters as fetal karyotype and maternal demographics. METHODS: FF was determined from samples previously collected for the MELISSA (Maternal Blood Is Source to Accurately Diagnose Fetal Aneuploidy) study. Samples were resequenced, analyzed blindly, and aligned to the human genome (assembly hg19). FF was calculated in pregnancies with male or aneuploid fetuses by means of an equation that incorporated the ratio of the tags in these samples to those of a euploid training set. RESULTS: The mean (SD) FF from euploid male pregnancies was 0.126 (0.052) (n = 160). Weak but statistically significant correlations were found between FF and the maternal body mass index (r2 = 0.18; P = 2.3 × 10−8) and between FF and gestational age (r2 = 0.02; P = 0.047). No relationship with maternal ethnicity or age was observed. Mean FF values for trisomies 21 (n = 90), 18 (n = 38), and 13 (n = 16) and for monosomy X (n = 20) were 0.135 (0.051), 0.089 (0.039), 0.090 (0.062), and 0.106 (0.045), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MPS tag-count data can be used to determine FF directly and accurately. Compared with male euploid fetuses, the FF is higher in maternal plasma when the fetus has trisomy 21 and is lower when the fetus has trisomy 18, 13, or monosomy X. The different biologies of these aneuploidies have practical implications for the determination of cutoff values, which in turn will affect the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fan, H. C., & Quake, S. R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010439 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Cell-free DNA Analysis for Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy
Norton, M. E., Jacobsson, B., Swamy, G. K., Laurent, L. C., Ranzini, A. C., Brar, H., Tomlinson, M. W., Pereira, L., Spitz, J. L., Hollemon, D., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1407349 · Cited by 817
Sequencing of Circulating Cell-free DNA during Pregnancy
Bianchi, D. W., & Chiu, R. W. K. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1705345 · Cited by 313
Self-citationBenn, P., Borrell, A., Chiu, R. W. K., Cuckle, H., Dugoff, L., Faas, B., Gross, S., Huang, T., Johnson, J., Maymon, R., et al. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4608 · Cited by 292
Screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood: Consequences of a failed result
Revello, R., Sarno, L., Ispas, A., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15851 · Cited by 157
Thung, D. T., Beulen, L., Hehir-Kwa, J., & Faas, B. H. (2015) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1586/14737159.2015.973857 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Rava, R. P., Srinivasan, A., Sehnert, A. J., & Bianchi, D. W.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 243-250
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2160764289
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating Fetal Cell-Free DNA Fractions Differ in Autosomal Aneuploidies and Monosomy X. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2013.207951
- The paper
- Rava, R. P., Srinivasan, A., Sehnert, A. J., & Bianchi, D. W. (2014). Circulating Fetal Cell-Free DNA Fractions Differ in Autosomal Aneuploidies and Monosomy X. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.207951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.