Influence of the Confounding Factors Age and Sex on MicroRNA Profiles from Peripheral Blood
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) measured from blood samples are promising minimally invasive biomarker candidates that have been extensively studied in several case-control studies. However, the influence of age and sex as confounding variables remains largely unknown. METHODS: We systematically explored the impact of age and sex on miRNAs in a cohort of 109 physiologically unaffected individuals whose blood was characterized by microarray technology (stage 1). We also investigated an independent cohort from a different institution consisting of 58 physiologically unaffected individuals having a similar mean age but with a smaller age distribution. These samples were measured by use of high-throughput sequencing (stage 2). RESULTS: We detected 318 miRNAs that were significantly correlated with age in stage 1 and, after adjustment for multiple testing of 35 miRNAs, remained statistically significant. Regarding sex, 144 miRNAs showed significant dysregulation. Here, no miRNA remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing. In the high-throughput datasets of stage 2, we generally observed a smaller number of significant associations, mainly as an effect of the smaller cohort size and age distribution. Nevertheless, we found 7 miRNAs that were correlated with age, of which 5 were concordant with stage 1. CONCLUSIONS: The age distribution of individuals recruited for case-control studies needs to be carefully considered, whereas sex may be less confounding. To support the translation of miRNAs into clinical application, we offer a web-based application (http://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mirnacon) to test individual miRNAs or miRNA signatures for their likelihood of being influenced.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age and gender are known to influence the miRNA pattern (12).
“different donors should be of different age and gender both of which are known to influence the miRNA pattern (12).”
From Distribution of miRNA expression across human tissues (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distribution of miRNA expression across human tissues
Ludwig, N., Leidinger, P., Becker, K., Backes, C., Fehlmann, T., Pallasch, C., Rheinheimer, S., Meder, B., Stähler, C., Meese, E., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw116 · Cited by 968 · see citing works
Self-citationAmeling, S., Kacprowski, T., Chilukoti, R. K., Malsch, C., Liebscher, V., Suhre, K., Pietzner, M., Friedrich, N., Homuth, G., Hammer, E., et al. (2015) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12920-015-0136-7 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
A mouse tissue atlas of small noncoding RNA
Isakova, A., Fehlmann, T., Keller, A., & Quake, S. R. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002277117 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationVegetarian diets, circulating miRNA expression and healthspan in subjects living in the Blue Zone
Liu, T., Gatto, N. M., Chen, Z., Qiu, H., Lee, G., Duerksen-Hughes, P., Fraser, G., & Wang, C. (2020) · Precision Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa037 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meder, B., Backes, C., Haas, J., Leidinger, P., Stähler, C., Großmann, T., Vogel, B., Frese, K., Giannitsis, E., Katus, H. A., Meese, E., & Keller, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Human Genetics, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
- Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany
- Clinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrucken, Germany
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-09-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1200-1208
- ISSN
- 0009-9147
- 1530-8561
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review