Online Exposure for Spider Phobia: Continuous Versus Intermittent Exposure
Open accessAbstract
Background: The aim of this research was to evaluate an online exposure treatment for spider phobia (www.feardrop.com) and to investigate the effects of intermittent versus continuous exposure. Methods: Spider phobic participants (N = 23) completed two 14-minute stages of laboratory-based online exposure. In the first of these stages exposure was either continuous or intermittent (alternating fearrelevant and -irrelevant images). One week later, participants commenced a sixstage home-based graded online exposure task, which was undertaken over 30 days. Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS) ratings were taken throughout all exposure stages. Spider fear was assessed prior to treatment, and at 1-week and 1-month post treatment. Results: Habituation was observed across each stage for both the laboratory and home-based tasks and generalisation of habituation was found between stages. Habituation was not impaired in the alternating fear-relevant and -irrelevant image condition, though subjects experienced less summed anxiety. Adherence rates were low in home-based online exposure. However, participants who completed 30-days post-treatment assessment (n = 14) showed a significant reduction in spider fear as measured by the Fear of Spiders Questionnaire (FSQ). Conclusions: Online exposure produces habituation and generalisation of habituation to spider images as well as longer-term reductions in spider fear. Alternating fear-relevant and -irrelevant exposure is feasible in online exposure and may lead to habituation with less summed anxiety that has implications for tolerability and acceptability. Measures to increase adherence rates and hence dosage delivered are a key consideration for further online exposure research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Web-based interventions often face difficulties such as medium to high dropout rates and low adherence to treatment.
“Web-based interventions often face difficulties such as medium to high dropout rates [92] and low adherence to treatment [93].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mayo-Wilson, E., & Montgomery, P. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005330.pub4 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Campos, D., Mira, A., Bretón-López, J., Castilla, D., Botella, C., Baños, R. M., & Quero, S. (2018) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s153041 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Matthews, A., Naran, N., & Kirkby, K. C. (2015) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.12.003 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMor, S., Grimaldos, J., Tur, C., Miguel, C., Cuijpers, P., Botella, C., & Quero, S. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100462 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Testing a gamified Spider App to reduce spider fear and avoidance.
Haberkamp, A., Walter, H., Althaus, P., Schmuck, M., Rief, W., & Schmidt, F. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102331 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Matthews, A. J., Scanlan, J. D., & Kirkby, K. C. (2012) · Behaviour Change · doi:10.1017/bec.2012.7 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationAn internet-based treatment for flying phobia using 360° images: A feasibility pilot study
Mor, S., Botella, C., Campos, D., Carlbring, P., Tur, C., & Quero, S. (2022) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100510 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mwisomi, E. M., Luminet, O., Chang, B. P. I., et al. (2023) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2023.2216053 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Matthews, A., Mackintosh, C., Williams, S., Williams, M., & Kirkby, K. (2017) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.07.012 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationActivación psicofisiológica de pacientes con zoofobias ante un ambiente de realidad virtual
Barbosa, E. P., Reyes, A. C. D., Duran, D. A. P., Bertel, L., Toro, J. P., & Gaviria, F. A. (2021) · Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte · doi:10.35575/rvucn.n62a6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Sanz-Gomez, S., González Ramírez, L. P., Herdoiza-Arroyo, P. E., Trevino Garcia, L. E., de la Rosa-Gómez, A., González-Cantero, J. O., Macias-Aguinaga, V., Arenas Landgrave, P., & Chávez-Valdez, S. M. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/53767 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Web-based interventions often face difficulties such as medium to high dropout rates [92] and low adherence to treatment [93].”
Background
- Authors
- Matthews, A. J., Wong, Z. H., Scanlan, J. D., & Kirkby, K. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Matthews, Allison J.
- Venue
- Behaviour Change
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 143-155
- ISSN
- 0813-4839 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-7768
- OpenAlex
- W2119756152
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Behaviour Change (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- spider phobia, intermittent exposure, continuous exposure, habituation, fear extinction, medication adherence, anxiety reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review