Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Netherlands Twin Register Biobank: A Resource for Genetic Epidemiological Studies

Open access
Willemsen, Gonneke, de Geus, Eco J. C., Bartels, Meike, van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M. Toos, Brooks, Andy I., Estourgie-van Burk, G. Frederique, Fugman, Douglas A., Hoekstra, Chantal, Hottenga, Jouke-Jan, Kluft, Kees, Meijer, Piet, Montgomery, Grant W., Rizzu, Patrizia, Sondervan, David, Smit, August B., Spijker, Sabine, Suchiman, H. Eka D., Tischfield, Jay A., Lehner, Thomas, Slagboom, P. Eline, Boomsma, Dorret I.·2010·Twin Research and Human Genetics

Abstract

In 2004 the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) started a large scale biological sample collection in twin families to create a resource for genetic studies on health, lifestyle and personality. Between January 2004 and July 2008, adult participants from NTR research projects were invited into the study. During a home visit between 7:00 and 10:00 am, fasting blood and morning urine samples were collected. Fertile women were bled on day 2–4 of the menstrual cycle, or in their pill-free week. Biological samples were collected for DNA isolation, gene expression studies, creation of cell lines and for biomarker assessment. At the time of blood sampling, additional phenotypic information concerning health, medication use, body composition and smoking was collected. Of the participants contacted, 69% participated. Blood and urine samples were collected in 9,530 participants (63% female, average age 44.4 (SD 15.5) years) from 3,477 families. Lipid profile, glucose, insulin, HbA1c, haematology, CRP, fibrinogen, liver enzymes and creatinine have been assessed. Longitudinal survey data on health, personality and lifestyle are currently available for 90% of all participants. Genome-wide SNP data are available for 3,524 participants, with additional genotyping ongoing. The NTR biobank, combined with the extensive phenotypic information available within the NTR, provides a valuable resource for the study of genetic determinants of individual differences in mental and physical health. It offers opportunities for DNA-based and gene expression studies as well as for future metabolomic and proteomic projects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1375/twin.13.3.231

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Willemsen, G., de Geus, E. J. C., Bartels, M., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M. T., Brooks, A. I., Estourgie-van Burk, G. F., Fugman, D. A., Hoekstra, C., Hottenga, J.-J., Kluft, K., Meijer, P., Montgomery, G. W., Rizzu, P., Sondervan, D., Smit, A. B., Spijker, S., Suchiman, H. E. D., Tischfield, J. A., Lehner, T., Slagboom, P. E., & Boomsma, D. I.
Venue
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
231-245
ISSN
  • 1832-4274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-2628
OpenAlex
W2113532105
Cited by
187
References
2
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Netherlands Twin Register Biobank: A Resource for Genetic Epidemiological Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1375/twin.13.3.231
The paper
Willemsen, G., de Geus, E. J. C., Bartels, M., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M. T., Brooks, A. I., Estourgie-van Burk, G. F., Fugman, D. A., Hoekstra, C., Hottenga, J.-J., Kluft, K., Meijer, P., Montgomery, G. W., Rizzu, P., Sondervan, D., Smit, A. B., Spijker, S., Suchiman, H. E. D., Tischfield, J. A., Lehner, T., . . . Boomsma, D. I. (2010). The Netherlands Twin Register Biobank: A Resource for Genetic Epidemiological Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.13.3.231

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.