Cited by 105Bone health and osteoporosis researchHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Medicare Payment Cuts For Osteoporosis Testing Reduced Use Despite Tests’ Benefit In Reducing Fractures

King, Alison B., Fiorentino, Donna M.·2011·Health Affairs

Abstract

Bone imaging known as DXA ("dexa")-dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the central skeleton--is considered the "gold standard" test for osteoporosis, which affects more than fifty million Americans. The tests are associated with improved clinical outcomes through preventing bone fractures. Cuts in Medicare Part B reimbursement for the provision of this preventive imaging in a physician's office began in 2007 and reached 56 percent below the 2006 level in January 2010. To encourage the use of DXA testing, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 provided partial relief from the cuts for two years (2010-11). Our study found that after a decade of growth, DXA testing in all Part B settings plateaued in 2007-09, resulting in 800,000 fewer tests than expected for Medicare beneficiaries--tests that might have prevented approximately 12,000 fractures. Testing declined in 2010, when the start of reimbursement relief under the Affordable Care Act was delayed, and increased outpatient testing failed to offset reduced use in physician offices. Our findings strongly suggest that the payment cuts reduced beneficiary access and that the tests were underused by elderly female Medicare beneficiaries despite strong association with fracture prevention. We recommend that Congress extend the payment relief granted under the Affordable Care Act for at least another two years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0233

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, A. B., & Fiorentino, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Alison B. King ( ) is principal of Alison B. King LLC, in McGraw, New York.
  • International Society for Clinical Densitometry (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2011-12
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2362-2370
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2127003583
Cited by
105
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
osteoporosis screening, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Medicare reimbursement cuts, Affordable Care Act, fracture prevention, Medicare Part B, older women, health care payment policy
MeSH terms
Medicare, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Osteoporosis, Practice Patterns, Physicians', United States, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Fractures, Bone, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review