Cited by 59Bone health and osteoporosis researchHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practices

The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States

Open access
Curtis, J. R., Laster, A., Becker, D. J., Carbone, L., Gary, L. C., Kilgore, M. L., Matthews, R. S., Morrisey, M. A. +3 more·2009·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Unlabelled Using national Medicare data from 1999-2006, we evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, travel distance was strongly associated with DXA testing. Rural residents were most strongly dependent on the availability of DXAs performed in physician offices.Introduction Medicare reimbursement for DXAs performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices) decreased in 2007. With declining reimbursement, some DXA providers may cease providing this service, which would increase travel distance for some people. The impact of travel distance on access to DXA is unclear.Methods Using national Medicare data, we identified claims for DXA to evaluate trends in the number and locations of DXAs performed. Travel distance was the distance from beneficiaries' residence and the nearest DXA provider. Binomial regression evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of DXA.Results In 2006, 2.9 million DXAs were performed, a 103% increase since 1999. In 2005-2006, 8.0% of persons were tested at non-facility sites versus 4.2% at facility sites. The remainder (88%) had no DXA. Persons traveling 5-9, 10-24, 25-39, and 40-54, and > or = 55 miles were less likely to receive DXA (adjusted risk ratios = 0.92, 0.79, 0.43, 0.32, and 0.26, respectively, < 5 miles referent). Rural residents were more dependent than urban residents on the availability of DXA from non-facility providers.Conclusion Approximately two-thirds of DXAs in 2005-2006 were performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices). Rural residents would have preferentially reduced access to DXA if there were fewer non-facility sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-008-0821-x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DXA is widely available even in low-resource areas, permitting evaluation of muscle mass.

    “Widespread availability of DXA even in low-resource areas344 permits this evaluation.”

    From Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies (2018) · cites this paper as [344]

    The Results report that 75.4% of rural Medicare beneficiaries lived within five miles of a DXA provider, supporting availability in many rural US areas. But the paper does not establish availability in low-resource areas as such; its Discussion also notes that rural access is more vulnerable to provider closures. The cited paper studies access to DXA testing, not its use to evaluate muscle mass. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, J. R., Laster, A., Becker, D. J., Carbone, L., Gary, L. C., Kilgore, M. L., Matthews, R. S., Morrisey, M. A., Saag, K. G., Tanner, S. B., & Delzell, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Curtis, J. R.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2008-12-24
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1553-1561
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2054524628
Cited by
59
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS016956)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR053351, K23AR053351, K24AR052361, AR-052361)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bone densitometry, health care access, travel distance, urban-rural differences, Medicare beneficiaries, older adults, Medicare reimbursement, osteoporosis screening
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Medicare, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Osteoporosis, United States, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review