Cited by 201Cultural Competency in Health CareMental Health Treatment and AccessRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Removing obstacles to eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in behavioral health care

Open access
Alegría, Margarita, Alvarez, Kiara, Ishikawa, Rachel Zack, DiMarzio, Karissa, McPeck, Samantha·2016·Health Affairs

Abstract

Despite decades of research, racial and ethnic disparities in behavioral health care persist. The Affordable Care Act expanded access to behavioral health care, but many reform initiatives fail to consider research about racial/ethnic minorities. Mistaken assumptions that underlie the expansion of behavioral health care run the risk of replicating existing service disparities. Based on a review of relevant literature and numerous observational and field studies with minority populations, we identified the following three mistaken assumptions: Improvement in health care access alone will reduce disparities, current service planning addresses minority patients' preferences, and evidence-based interventions are readily available for diverse populations. We propose tailoring the provision of care to remove obstacles that minority patients face in accessing treatment, promoting innovative services that respond to patients' needs and preferences, and allowing flexibility in evidence-based practice and the expansion of the behavioral health workforce. These proposals should help meet the health care needs of a growing racial/ethnic minority population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0029

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 201

Authors
Alegría, M., Alvarez, K., Ishikawa, R. Z., DiMarzio, K., & McPeck, S.
Affiliations
  • Margarita Alegría ( ) is a professor of psychology in the Department of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and chief of the Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), both in Boston.
  • Kiara Alvarez is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, at MGH.
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2016-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
991-999
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2416464179
Cited by
201
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
32.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CD‐12‐11‐4187)
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60md002261-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG046149)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH073469, R01MH098374, U01MH062209)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA034952)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60-MD-002261)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
racial and ethnic disparities, behavioral health services, Affordable Care Act, health care access, minority patients, patient preferences, evidence-based interventions, behavioral health workforce, health care reform, tailored care
MeSH terms
Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mental Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review