Cited by 32Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Association Of Medicare’s Annual Wellness Visit With Cancer Screening, Referrals, Utilization, And Spending

Open access
Ganguli, Ishani, Souza, Jeffrey, McWilliams, J. Michael, Mehrotra, Ateev·2019·Health Affairs

Abstract

Medicare's annual wellness visit was introduced in 2011 to promote evidence-based preventive care and identify risk factors and undiagnosed conditions in aging adults. Use of the visit has risen steadily since then, yet its benefits remain unclear. Using national Medicare data for 2008-15, we examined claims from fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries attributed to practices that did or did not adopt the visit. We performed difference-in-differences analysis to compare differential changes in appropriate and low-value cancer screening, functional and neuropsychiatric care, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and total spending. Examining 17.8 million beneficiary-years, we found modest differential improvements in rates of evidence-based screening and declines in emergency department visits. However, when we accounted for trends that predated the introduction of the visit, none of these benefits persisted. In sum, we found no substantive association between annual wellness visits and improvements in care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00304

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These sensitivity approaches allow researchers to evaluate robustness of conclusions across reasonable assumptions even without data on potential confounders.

    “These approaches allow researchers to evaluate and communicate the robustness of conclusions across reasonable assumptions even lacking data on potential confounders (see examples [104, 105]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Jones D, Molitor D, Reif J, Baicker K, Bhattacharya J, Deryugina T, What Do Workplace Wellness Programs Do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper series Cambridge, MA; 2018 [ cited 2018 Dec 3]. Available from: http://www.nber.org/workplacewellness.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ganguli, I., Souza, J., McWilliams, J. M., & Mehrotra, A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
1927-1935
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2987865965
Cited by
32
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01AG032952)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
annual wellness visit, Medicare, cancer screening, preventive medicine, low-value care, emergency department visits, hospitalization, health care spending, fee-for-service Medicare, older adults, health policy evaluation
MeSH terms
Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Health Expenditures, Female, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, United States, Medicare Part A, Medicare Part B, Fee-for-Service Plans, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review