Incorrect Provider Directories Associated With Out-Of-Network Mental Health Care And Outpatient Surprise Bills: An examination of the role inaccurate provider directories play in out-of-network mental health treatment and surprise bills.
Open accessAbstract
Mental health services are up to six times more likely than general medical services to be delivered by an out-of-network provider, in part because many psychiatrists do not accept commercial insurance. Provider directories help patients identify in-network providers, although directory information is often not accurate. We conducted a national survey of privately insured patients who received specialty mental health treatment. We found that 44 percent had used a mental health provider directory and that 53 percent of these patients had encountered directory inaccuracies. Those who encountered inaccuracies were more likely (40 percent versus 20 percent) to be treated by an out-of-network provider and four times more likely (16 percent versus 4 percent) to receive a surprise outpatient out-of-network bill (that is, they did not initially know that a provider was out of network). A federal standard for directory accuracy, stronger enforcement of existing laws with insurers liable for directory errors, and additional monitoring by regulators may be needed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insurance-provided search portals regularly surface results utilizing out of date directories and recommend providers who are neither appropriate for the client's needs, available, nor taking new clients.
“Insurance-provided search portals, the most prevalent tool, regularly surface results utilizing out of date directories and recommend providers who are neither appropriate for the client’s needs, available, nor taking new clients.8-10”
From Using Machine Learning to Match Clients and Therapy Providers: Evaluating Clinical Quality and Cost of Care (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The Study Results (Directory Inaccuracies; page not provided) report that users encountered listings for providers who were not taking new patients or would not treat their condition. The Discussion describes directories as widely used and their inaccuracies as common, but the paper does not establish that insurance search portals are the most prevalent tool or that they actively recommend providers. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Screening for serious mental illness in the general population
Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., Howes, M. J., Normand, S.-L. T., Manderscheid, R. W., Walters, E. E., et al. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184 · Cited by 5,692 · see citing works
Availability of Outpatient Care From Psychiatrists: A Simulated-Patient Study in Three U.S. Cities
Malowney, M., Keltz, S., Fischer, D., & Boyd, J. W. (2015) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400051 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- [1]Busch SH, Ndumele CD, Loveridge CF, Kyanko KA. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns among psychiatrists who do not accept private insurance. Psychiatr Serv. 2019; 70(1): 35– 9. 30453856 PMC6408285
- [2]Mark TL, Olesiuk W, Ali MM, Sherman LJ, Mutter R, Teich JL. Differential reimbursement of psychiatric services by psychiatrists and other medical providers. Psychiatr Serv. 2018; 69(3): 281– 5. 29191138
- [4]Pelech D, Hayford T. Medicare Advantage and commercial prices for mental health services. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 38(2): 262– 7. 30715986
- [5]Bishop TF, Seirup JK, Pincus HA, Ross JS. Population of US practicing psychiatrists declined, 2003–13, which may help explain poor access to mental health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(7): 1271– 7. 27385244
- [6]Kyanko KA, Curry LA, Busch SH. Out-of-network provider use more likely in mental health than general health care among privately insured. Med Care. 2013; 51(8): 699– 705. 23774509 PMC4707657
- [7]Haeder SF, Weimer DL, Mukamel DB. Surprise billing: no surprise in view of network complexity. Health Affairs Blog [blog on the Internet] 2019 6 5 [ cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190603.704918/full/ · DOI
- [8]Haeder SF, Weimer DL, Mukamel DB. A knotty problem: consumer access and the regulation of provider networks. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019; 44(6): 937– 54. 31408883
- [10]Blech B, West JC, Yang Z, Barber KD, Wang P, Coyle C. Availability of network psychiatrists among the largest health insurance carriers in Washington, D.C. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68(9): 962– 5. 28457210
- [11]Cama S, Malowney M, Smith AJB, Spottswood M, Cheng E, Ostrowsky L, Availability of outpatient mental health care by pediatricians and child psychiatrists in five U.S. cities. Int J Health Serv. 2017; 47(4): 621– 35. 28474997
- [15]Olfson M, Wang S, Wall M, Marcus SC, Blanco C. Trends in serious psychological distress and outpatient mental health care of US adults. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019; 76(2): 152– 61. 30484838 PMC6439744
- [20]Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2004.
- [22]Horgan CM, Stewart MT, Reif S, Garnick DW, Hodgkin D, Merrick EL, Behavioral health services in the changing landscape of private health plans. Psychiatr Serv. 2016; 67(6): 622– 9. 26876663 PMC4889503
- [25]Haeder SF, Weimer D, Mukamel DB. A consumer-centric approach to network adequacy: access to four specialties in California’s Marketplace. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(11): 1918– 26. 31682498
- [26]Sinaiko AD, Rosenthal MB. Examining a health care price transparency tool: who uses it, and how they shop for care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(4): 662– 70. 27044967
- [27]Bishop TF, Press MJ, Keyhani S, Pincus HA. Acceptance of insurance by psychiatrists and the implications for access to mental health care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014; 71(2): 176– 81. 24337499 PMC3967759
- [28]Zhu JM, Zhang Y, Polsky D. Networks in ACA Marketplaces are narrower for mental health care than for primary care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017; 36(9): 1624– 31. 28874490
- [29]Holstein R, Paul DP 3rd. “Phantom networks” of managed behavioral health providers: an empirical study of their existence and effect on patients in two New Jersey counties. Hosp Top. 2012; 90(3): 65– 73. 22989224
- [30]Montz E, Layton T, Busch AB, Ellis RP, Rose S, McGuire TG. Risk-adjustment simulation: plans may have incentives to distort mental health and substance use coverage. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(6): 1022– 8. 27269018 PMC5027954
- [31]McGuire TG. Achieving mental health care parity might require changes in payments and competition. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(6): 1029– 35. 27269019 PMC5026763
- [33]Adelberg M, Frakt A, Polsky D, Strollo MK. Improving provider directory accuracy: can machine-readable directories help? Am J Manag Care. 2019; 25(5): 241– 5. 31120718
- [37]Giovannelli J, Lucia KW, Corlette S. Implementing the Affordable Care Act: state regulation of Marketplace plan provider networks. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2015; 10: 1– 11. 25970875
- [38]Haeder SF, Weimer DL, Mukamel DB. Secret shoppers find access to providers and network accuracy lacking for those in Marketplace and commercial plans. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(7): 1160– 6. 27385229
- [39]Gillespie A, Reader TW. Patient centered insights: using health care complaints to reveal hot spots and blind spots in quality and safety. Milbank Q. 2018; 96(3): 530– 67. 30203606 PMC6131356
- [40]Howard DH. Adverse effects of prohibiting narrow provider networks. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(7): 591– 3. 25119604
- [41]Polsky D, Cidav Z, Swanson A. Marketplace plans with narrow physician networks feature lower monthly premiums than plans with larger networks. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(10): 1842– 8. 27702958
- [42]Hall MA, Adler L, Ginsburg PB, Trish E. Reducing unfair out-of-network billing—integrated approaches to protecting patients. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(7): 610– 2. 30650002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, J. L., Billovits, C., Chen, S.-Y., Wickham, R. E., Kocher, B., Chen, C. E., & Lungu, A. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2025.06.002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Busch, S. H., & Kyanko, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 975-983
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- PMC
- PMC7497897
- OpenAlex
- W3031504470
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH109783)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Keywords
- out-of-network care, mental health services, surprise billing, insurance coverage, psychiatrists, private insurance, health insurance regulation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Insurance Carriers, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Outpatients, Psychiatry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review