The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Survey Of Primary Care Physicians In Eleven Countries, 2009: Perspectives On Care, Costs, And Experiences: Doctors say problems exist across all eleven countries, although some nations are doing a better job than others.
Abstract
This 2009 survey of primary care doctors in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States finds wide differences in practice systems, incentives, perceptions of access to care, use of health information technology (IT), and programs to improve quality. Response rates exceeded 40 percent except in four countries: Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. U.S. and Canadian physicians lag in the adoption of IT. U.S. doctors were the most likely to report that there are insurance restrictions on obtaining medication and treatment for their patients and that their patients often have difficulty with costs. We believe that opportunities exist for cross-national learning in disease management, use of teams, and performance feedback to improve primary care globally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Butler, D. C., Petterson, S., Phillips, R. L., & Bazemore, A. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01449.x · Cited by 689
Primary Health Care in Canada: Systems in Motion
HUTCHISON, B., LEVESQUE, J.-F., STRUMPF, E., & COYLE, N. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00628.x · Cited by 508
McGinn, C. A., Grenier, S., Duplantie, J., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Légaré, F., & Gagnon, M.-P. (2011) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-46 · Cited by 393
Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress
Meystre, S. M., Lovis, C., Bürkle, T., Tognola, G., Budrionis, A., & Lehmann, C. U. (2017) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.15265/iy-2017-007 · Cited by 204
Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review
Lau, F., Price, M., Boyd, J., Partridge, C., Bell, H., & Raworth, R. (2012) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-10 · Cited by 199
“[Exhibit-1 in ref [3]]), study design (experimental/observational/descriptive) and time period (2000-04 vs.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Doty, M. M., Squires, D., Peugh, J., & Applebaum, S.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- w1171-w1183
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2143498916
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 82.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey Of Primary Care Physicians In Eleven Countries, 2009: Perspectives On Care, Costs, And Experiences: Doctors say problems exist across all eleven countries, although some nations are doing a better job than others. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1171
- The paper
- Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Doty, M. M., Squires, D., Peugh, J., & Applebaum, S. (2009). A Survey Of Primary Care Physicians In Eleven Countries, 2009: Perspectives On Care, Costs, And Experiences: Doctors say problems exist across all eleven countries, although some nations are doing a better job than others. Health Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
