The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variations in Physician Practice: The Role of Uncertainty
Abstract
Prologue: Nothing more underscores the reality that medical care represents a melding of art and science than the wide variation in the use and cost of that care. One of the factors that leads to practice variations is uncertainty in the minds of doctors about how to approach a particular medical problem. David Eddy, who holds a medical degree from the University of Virginia and a doctor of philosophy degree in applied mathematics from Stanford University, has made a professional career of reducing uncertainty in medical practice and helping doctors find their way to the most efficacious treatments for patients. Eddy operates at the intersection of math and medicine, applying probability theory to the uncertainty of approaches to care. Although his pursuits have not always been appreciated by the profession —many of his conclusions cut against the grain of conventional medical judgment—Eddy has been awarded the Manchester Prize by the Operations Research Society of America, the most prestigious honor that this organization of applied mathematicians bestows. Eddy was recognized for a book he authored entitled, Screening for Cancer: Theory, Analysis and Design . The essence of the book was a study undertaken by the American Cancer Society to determine how often a doctor should give women a pap smear. For forty years, the society has promoted the annual pap smear as a cancer detection treatment. Factoring in all of the relevant data and subjecting it to his mathmatical microscope, Eddy determined that the most sensible frequency for administering this test is every three years. The cancer society changed its recommendations accordingly, provoking a storm of controversy within some medical quarters. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology took particular exception to the recommended three-year frequency, but the cancer society did not waver from its new standard. Eddy is a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences and is a member of the World Health Organization Expert Advisory Panel on Cancer. Eddy is now developing a third-party payer process of setting reimbursement policies for medical procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care: A Conceptual Taxonomy
Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Arora, N. K. (2011) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x10393976 · Cited by 747
Shortell, S. M., Bennett, C. L., & Byck, G. R. (1998) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00107 · Cited by 639
Steenbeek, R., Schellart, A. J., Mulders, H., Anema, J. R., Kroneman, H., & Besseling, J. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-1 · Cited by 420
A Consumer-Choice Health Plan for the 1990s
Enthoven, A., & Kronick, R. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198901053200106 · Cited by 364
Mittman, B. S., Tonesk, X., & Jacobson, P. D. (1992) · QRB - Quality Review Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30567-x · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Eddy, D. M.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 74-89
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2155095934
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in Physician Practice: The Role of Uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.74
- The paper
- Eddy, D. M. (1984). Variations in Physician Practice: The Role of Uncertainty. Health Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.