Cited by 134Medical Malpractice and Liability IssuesHealthcare Policy and ManagementLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The Growth Of Physician Medical Malpractice Payments: Evidence From The National Practitioner Data Bank: The growth of malpractice payments is less than previously thought.

Chandra, Amitabh, Nundy, Shantanu, Seabury, Seth A.·2005·Health Affairs

Abstract

We used data from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) to study the growth of physician malpractice payments. Judgments at trial account for 4 percent of all malpractice payments; settlements account for the remaining 96 percent. The average payment grew 52 percent between 1991 and 2003 (4 percent per year) and now exceeds dollar 12 per capita each year. These increases are consistent with increases in the cost of health care. A preoccupation with data on judgments, extreme awards, or specific specialties results in an incomplete understanding of the growth of physician malpractice payments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.240

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandra, A., Nundy, S., & Seabury, S. A.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2005-01
Volume
24
Issue
Suppl1
Pages
W5-240-W5-249
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2108391471
Cited by
134
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
24.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01 AG19783-02, P01AG019783)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
medical malpractice, malpractice settlements, National Practitioner Data Bank, health care costs, payment trends, tort liability
MeSH terms
Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Malpractice, Physicians, United States, National Practitioner Data Bank

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review