Fat Distribution and End-Expiratory Lung Volume in Lean and Obese Men and Women
Abstract
Background Although obesity significantly reduces end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), the relationship between EELV and detailed measures of fat distribution has not been studied in obese men and women. To investigate, EELV and chest wall fat distribution (ie, rib cage, anterior subcutaneous abdominal fat, posterior subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat) were measured in lean men and women (ie, < 25% body fat) and obese men and women (ie, > 30% body fat). Methods All subjects underwent pulmonary function testing, hydrostatic weighing, and MRI scans. Data were analyzed for the men and women separately by independent t test, and the relationships between variables were determined by regression analysis. Results All body composition measurements were significantly different among the lean and obese men and women (p < 0.001). However, with only a few exceptions, fat distribution was similar among the lean and obese men and women (p > 0.05). The mean EELV was significantly lower in the obese men (39 +/- 6% vs 46 +/- 4% total lung capacity [TLC], respectively; p < 0.0005) and women (40 +/- 4% vs 53 +/- 4% TLC, respectively; p < 0.0001) compared with lean control subjects. Many estimates of body fat were significantly correlated with EELV for both men and women. Conclusions In both men and women, the decrease in EELV with obesity appears to be related to the cumulative effect of increased chest wall fat rather than to any specific regional chest wall fat distribution. Also, with only a few exceptions, relative fat distribution is markedly similar between lean and obese subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck) can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics, usually in a dose-response fashion.
“Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck), can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics,92–112 usually in a dose-response fashion.”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [96]
Cites
Mechanical Constraints on Exercise Hyperpnea in a Fit Aging Population
Johnson, B. D., Reddan, W. G., Seow, K. C., & Dempsey, J. A. (1991) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_pt_1.968 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Obesity on Oxygen Desaturation during Sleep-disordered Breathing
Peppard, P. E., Ward, N. R., & Morrell, M. J. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200905-0773oc · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Saey, Gagnon, P., Guenette, J., Langer, D., Laviolette, L., Mainguy, V., Maltais, F., & Ribeiro, F. (2014) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s38934 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“They are likely influenced by several factors, such as COPD phenotype(42) and fat distribution.(96)”
The effects of obesity on lung volumes and oxygenation
Littleton, S. W., & Tulaimat, A. (2017) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2017.01.004 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Ora, J., Laveneziana, P., Ofir, D., Deesomchok, A., Webb, K. A., & O'Donnell, D. E. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200904-0530oc · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Effect of obesity on respiratory mechanics during rest and exercise in COPD
Ora, J., Laveneziana, P., Wadell, K., Preston, M., Webb, K. A., & O'Donnell, D. E. (2011) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01131.2010 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Weight Loss via Diet and Exercise Improves Exercise Breathing Mechanics in Obese Men
Babb, T. G., Wyrick, B. L., Chase, P. J., DeLorey, D. S., Rodder, S. G., Feng, M. Y., & Ranasinghe, K. G. (2011) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.10-1088 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Babb, T. G., Wyrick, B. L., DeLorey, D. S., Chase, P. J., & Feng, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- Texas Health Dallas (US)
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Babb, Tony G.
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 704-711
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162113861
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- end-expiratory lung volume, obesity, body fat distribution, visceral fat, subcutaneous abdominal fat, body composition, sex differences, lung function, total lung capacity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Expiratory Reserve Volume, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Thoracic Wall, Abdominal Fat, Body Fat Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review