Cited by 136Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchBody Composition Measurement TechniquesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Fat Distribution and End-Expiratory Lung Volume in Lean and Obese Men and Women

Babb, Tony G., Wyrick, Brenda L., DeLorey, Darren S., Chase, Paul J., Feng, Mabel Y.·2008·Chest

Abstract

Background Although obesity significantly reduces end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), the relationship between EELV and detailed measures of fat distribution has not been studied in obese men and women. To investigate, EELV and chest wall fat distribution (ie, rib cage, anterior subcutaneous abdominal fat, posterior subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat) were measured in lean men and women (ie, < 25% body fat) and obese men and women (ie, > 30% body fat). Methods All subjects underwent pulmonary function testing, hydrostatic weighing, and MRI scans. Data were analyzed for the men and women separately by independent t test, and the relationships between variables were determined by regression analysis. Results All body composition measurements were significantly different among the lean and obese men and women (p < 0.001). However, with only a few exceptions, fat distribution was similar among the lean and obese men and women (p > 0.05). The mean EELV was significantly lower in the obese men (39 +/- 6% vs 46 +/- 4% total lung capacity [TLC], respectively; p < 0.0005) and women (40 +/- 4% vs 53 +/- 4% TLC, respectively; p < 0.0001) compared with lean control subjects. Many estimates of body fat were significantly correlated with EELV for both men and women. Conclusions In both men and women, the decrease in EELV with obesity appears to be related to the cumulative effect of increased chest wall fat rather than to any specific regional chest wall fat distribution. Also, with only a few exceptions, relative fat distribution is markedly similar between lean and obese subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.07-1728

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck) can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics, usually in a dose-response fashion.

    “Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck), can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics,92–112 usually in a dose-response fashion.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babb, T. G., Wyrick, B. L., DeLorey, D. S., Chase, P. J., & Feng, M. Y.
Affiliations
  • Texas Health Dallas (US)
  • Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Babb, Tony G.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
704-711
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162113861
Cited by
136
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
end-expiratory lung volume, obesity, body fat distribution, visceral fat, subcutaneous abdominal fat, body composition, sex differences, lung function, total lung capacity
MeSH terms
Adult, Expiratory Reserve Volume, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Thoracic Wall, Abdominal Fat, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review