Cited by 400Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Determination of the minimal clinically important difference scores for the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory symptom scale in two populations of patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection

Open access
Quittner, Alexandra L., Modi, Avani C., Wainwright, Claire, Otto, Kelly, Kirihara, Jean, Montgomery, A. Bruce·2009·Chest

Abstract

Background The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) is a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) containing both generic scales and scales specific to cystic fibrosis (CF). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) score for a PRO corresponds to the smallest clinically relevant change a patient can detect. MCID scores for the CFQ-R respiratory symptom (CFQ-R-Respiratory) scale were determined using data from two 28 day, open-label, tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) studies in patients with CF and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. At study enrollment, patients in the study 1-exacerbation had symptoms indicative of pulmonary exacerbation (n = 84; < 14 years of age, 31 patients; > or = 14 years of age, 53 patients); patients in study 2-stable had stable respiratory symptoms (n = 140; < 14 years of age, 14 patients; > or = 14 years, 126 patients). Methods The anchor-based method utilized a global rating-of-change questionnaire (GRCQ) that assessed patients' perceptions of change in their respiratory symptoms after TIS treatment. The mean change from baseline CFQ-R-Respiratory scores were mapped onto the GRCQ to estimate the MCID. The two distribution-based methods were as follows: (1) 0.5 SD of mean change in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores (baseline to end of TIS treatment); and (2) 1 SEM for baseline CFQ-R-Respiratory scores. Triangulation of these three estimates defined the MCIDs. Results MCID scores were larger for patients in study 1-exacerbation (8.5 points) than for those in study 2-stable (4.0 points), likely reflecting differences in patient disease status (exacerbation/stable) between these studies. Conclusions Patient benefit from new and current CF therapies can be evaluated using changes in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores. Using the MCID provides a systematic way to interpret these changes, and facilitates the identification of CF treatments that improve both symptoms and physiologic variables, potentially leading to better treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. Trial registration (study 1-exacerbation): Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN 12605000602628 Trial registration (study 2-stable): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00104520.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.08-1190

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quittner, A. L., Modi, A. C., Wainwright, C., Otto, K., Kirihara, J., & Montgomery, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Quittner, Alexandra L.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
1610-1618
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151174404
Cited by
400
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
19.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (R01 FD003016)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR10733, M01 RR000489, M01RR000400, M01RR000750, M01RR001066, M01RR010710, M01RR001070, M01RR000046, M01RR023940, M01RR002172, M01RR000070, M01RR000043, M01RR000065, M01RR000039, M01RR000069, M01RR000082, M01RR000037, M01RR000188, M01RR000064, M01RR000042, M01RR000034, M01RR000827)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, minimal clinically important difference, Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, respiratory symptoms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, patient-reported outcomes, pulmonary exacerbations, anchor-based methods, distribution-based methods, medication adherence, pediatric and adult patients, CFTR modulators
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adolescent, Age Factors, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Infections, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Function Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review