Cited by 125Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Outcomes of Home-Based Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Skomro, Robert P., Gjevre, John, Reid, John, McNab, Brian, Ghosh, Sunita, Stiles, Maryla, Jokic, Ruzica, Ward, Heather +1 more·2010·Chest

Abstract

Background Home diagnosis and therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may improve access to testing and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. We compared subjective sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life, BP, and CPAP adherence after 4 weeks of CPAP therapy in subjects in whom OSA was diagnosed and treated at home and in those evaluated in the sleep laboratory. Methods A randomized trial was performed consisting of home-based level 3 testing followed by 1 week of auto-CPAP and fixed-pressure CPAP based on the 95% pressure derived from the auto-CPAP device, and in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) (using mostly split-night protocol) with CPAP titration; 102 subjects were randomized (age, 47.4 +/- 11.4 years; 63 men; BMI, 32.3 +/- 6.3 kg/m(2); Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]: 12.5 +/- 4.3). The outcome measures were daytime sleepiness (ESS), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), quality of life (Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index [SAQLI], 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36], BP, and CPAP adherence after 4 weeks. Results After 4 weeks of CPAP therapy, there were no significant differences in ESS (PSG 6.4 +/- 3.8 vs home monitoring [HM] 6.5 +/- 3.8, P = .71), PSQI (PSG 5.4 +/- 3.1 vs HM 6.2 +/- 3.4, P = .30), SAQLI (PSG 4.5 +/- 1.1 vs HM 4.6 +/- 1.1, P = .85), SF-36 vitality (PSG 62.2 +/- 23.3 vs HM 64.1 +/- 18.4, P = .79), SF-36 HM (PSG 84.0 +/- 10.4 vs HM 81.3 +/- 14.9, P = .39), and BP (PSG 129/84 +/- 11/0 vs HM 125/81 +/- 13/9,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.09-0577

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skomro, R. P., Gjevre, J., Reid, J., McNab, B., Ghosh, S., Stiles, M., Jokic, R., Ward, H., & Cotton, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Skomro, Robert P.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
138
Issue
2
Pages
257-263
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152468079
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, home sleep testing, CPAP therapy, auto-CPAP, CPAP adherence, daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life, blood pressure, CPAP titration, home-based diagnosis, polysomnography comparison, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SF-36 vitality
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Sleep, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review