Sex Differences in Emphysema and Airway Disease in Smokers
Abstract
Background The authors of previous reports have suggested that women are more susceptible to cigarette smoke and to an airway-predominant COPD phenotype rather than an emphysema-predominant COPD phenotype. The purpose of this study was to test for sex differences in COPD phenotypes by using high-resolution CT (HRCT) scanning in male and female smokers with and without COPD. Methods All subjects completed spirometry and answered an epidemiologic respiratory questionnaire. Inspiratory HRCT scans were obtained on 688 smokers enrolled in a family-based study of COPD. Emphysema was assessed by using a density mask with a cutoff of -950 Hounsfield units to calculate the low-attenuation area percentage (LAA%) and by the fractal value D, which is the slope of a power law analysis defining the relationship between the number and size of the emphysematous lesions. Airway wall thickness was assessed by calculating the square root of the airway wall area (SQRTWA) and the percentage of the total airway area taken by the airway wall (WA%) relative to the internal perimeter. Results Women had a similar FEV(1) (women, 65.5% +/- 31.9% predicted; men, 62.1% +/- 30.4% predicted; p = 0.16) but fewer pack-years of cigarette smoking (women, 37.8 +/- 19.7 pack-years; men, 47.8 +/- 27.4 pack-years; p < 0.0001). Men had a greater LAA% (24% +/- 12% vs 20% +/- 11%, respectively; p < 0.0001) and larger emphysematous spaces than women, and these differences persisted after adjusting for covariates (weight, pack-years of smoking, current smoking status, center of enrollment, and FEV(1) percent predicted; p = 0.0006). Women had a smaller SQRTWA and WA% after adjusting for covariates (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Male smokers have more emphysema than female smokers, but female smokers do not show increased wall thickness compared with men.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When restricted to emphysema, women present a different pattern of disease compared with men, ie, smaller airway lumen and thicker airway walls.
“When restricted to emphysema, women also present a different pattern of disease compared with men, ie, smaller airway lumen and thicker airway walls.136,137”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [137]
Cites
Miller, M. R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., et al. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 · Cited by 15,627 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sex differences and sex steroids in lung health and disease
Townsend, E. A., Miller, V. M., & Prakash, Y. S. (2012) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2010-0031 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Saey, Gagnon, P., Guenette, J., Langer, D., Laviolette, L., Mainguy, V., Maltais, F., & Ribeiro, F. (2014) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s38934 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“136,137 During constant work rate cycle exercise testing at the same relative intensity, women with COPD hyperinflated at a rate similar to that in men ( Δ IC).”
Lung cellular senescence is independent of aging in a mouse model of COPD/emphysema
Rashid, K., Sundar, I. K., Gerloff, J., Li, D., & Rahman, I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27209-3 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Camp, P. G., Coxson, H. O., Levy, R. D., Pillai, S. G., Anderson, W., Vestbo, J., Kennedy, S. M., Silverman, E. K., Lomas, D. A., & Paré, P. D.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Camp, Pat G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1480-1488
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032952024
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- sex differences, emphysema, airway disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD phenotypes, cigarette smoking, airway wall thickness, low attenuation area, fractal dimension, high-resolution computed tomography, women smokers
- MeSH terms
- Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Emphysema, Respiratory Function Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Characteristics, Smoking, Spirometry, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Incidence, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review