Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 520

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Salmeterol Xinafoate in the Treatment of COPD

Open access
Mahler, Donald A., Donohue, James F., Barbee, Robert A., Goldman, Michael D., Gross, Nicholas J., Wisniewski, Michael E., Yancey, Steven W., Zakes, Bradford A., Rickard, Kathleen A., Anderson, Wayne H.·1999·Chest

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, with inhaled ipratropium bromide and inhaled placebo in patients with COPD. DESIGN: A stratified, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical trial. SETTING: Multiple sites at clinics and university medical centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred eleven symptomatic patients with COPD with FEV1 < or = 65% predicted and no clinically significant concurrent disease. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of inhaled salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), inhaled ipratropium bromide (36 microg four times a day), and inhaled placebo (2 puffs four times a day) over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Salmeterol xinafoate was significantly (p < 0.0001) better than placebo and ipratropium in improving lung function at the recommended doses over the 12-week trial. Both salmeterol and ipratropium reduced dyspnea related to activities of daily living compared with placebo; this improvement was associated with reduced use of supplemental albuterol. Analyses of time to first COPD exacerbation revealed salmeterol to be superior to placebo and ipratropium (p < 0.05). Adverse effects were similar among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These collective data support the use of salmeterol as first-line bronchodilator therapy for the long-term treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with COPD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.115.4.957

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 520

Metadata

Authors
Mahler, D. A., Donohue, J. F., Barbee, R. A., Goldman, M. D., Gross, N. J., Wisniewski, M. E., Yancey, S. W., Zakes, B. A., Rickard, K. A., & Anderson, W. H.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
957-965
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088022718
Cited by
520
References
3
FWCI
24.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Salmeterol Xinafoate in the Treatment of COPD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1378/chest.115.4.957
The paper
Mahler, D. A., Donohue, J. F., Barbee, R. A., Goldman, M. D., Gross, N. J., Wisniewski, M. E., Yancey, S. W., Zakes, B. A., Rickard, K. A., & Anderson, W. H. (1999). Efficacy of Salmeterol Xinafoate in the Treatment of COPD. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.115.4.957

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.