Cited by 162Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Assessment of Lymph Node Tuberculosis in Northern Germany

Geldmacher, Henning, Taube, Christian, Kroeger, Clemens, Magnussen, Helgo, Kirsten, Detlef K.·2002·Chest

Abstract

Aim of study To evaluate patient profiles, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies in patients with lymph node tuberculosis.Methods Demographic data, diagnostic findings, and therapies were retrospectively analyzed in 60 patients with lymph node tuberculosis who were hospitalized between 1992 and 1999.Results Thirty percent (n = 18) of patients were natives, and 70% were immigrants (n = 42). The cervical lymph nodes were most frequently involved (63.3%), followed by the mediastinal lymph nodes (26.7%) and the axillary lymph nodes (8.3%). All patients (except one patient who was HIV-positive) showed a positive response to tuberculin skin testing. Lymph node excision and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were similarly effective in obtaining sufficient material for histologic and microbiological analysis. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was identified in 43.3% of patients by microbiological testing, and culture methods showed the highest sensitivity. Despite standard treatment, the initial enlargement of the lymph nodes occurred in 20% of patients and local complications occurred in 10%.Conclusion Lymph node tuberculosis is still an important issue in developed countries and has to be considered in differential diagnosis. The best approach appears to be a combination of skin testing and FNA. Negative results in the identification of M tuberculosis do not exclude the diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.121.4.1177

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geldmacher, H., Taube, C., Kroeger, C., Magnussen, H., & Kirsten, D. K.
Affiliations
LungenClinic Grosshansdorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirsten, Detlef K.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
1177-1182
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148782937
Cited by
162
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
tuberculous lymphadenitis, cervical lymph nodes, mediastinal lymph nodes, axillary lymph nodes, tuberculin skin test, fine-needle aspiration, lymph node excision, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, diagnostic sensitivity, treatment outcomes, local complications, immigrants, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antitubercular Agents, Bacteriological Techniques, Biopsy, Needle, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Germany, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Tuberculin Test, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review