Cited by 83Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Prospective Evaluation of Nocturnal Oximetry for Detection of Sleep-Related Breathing Disturbances in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Sériès, Frédeéric, Kimoff, R. John, Morrison, Debra, Leblanc, Marie Helene, Smilovitch, Mark, Howlett, Jonathan, Logan, Alexander G., Floras, John S. +1 more·2005·Chest

Abstract

Background Because patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) can benefit from specific treatment for coexisting obstructive and central sleep apnea (CSA), there is a need to develop accurate screening tools to identify or exclude these sleep-related breathing disturbances (SRBDs) in patients with CHF. Objectives To evaluate, prospectively, the diagnostic value of nocturnal home oximetry in identifying SRBD in CHF patients and in distinguishing central events from obstructive events. Design Blinded comparison of hospital and home oximetry, and polysomnographic nocturnal recordings Setting Cardiac heart failure and sleep clinics in three tertiary referral centers. Patients Fifty consecutive patients who were investigated for participation in the Canadian Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Trial for Congestive Heart Failure with Central Sleep Apnea and were recruited from three different centers. Measurements and results Patients underwent two oximetry recordings, one at home and one during a polysomnographic study. The criterion for an SRBD was the presence of > 15 apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep during polysomnography or an oxygen desaturation index of > 10 events per hour during oximetry. The pattern of desaturation/resaturation during oximetry was also examined to distinguish obstructive events from central events. Using a 2% fall in pulse oximetric saturation as the criterion for oxygen desaturation, home oximetry had a 85% sensitivity and a 93% specificity (p Concl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.127.5.1507

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sériès, F., Kimoff, R. J., Morrison, D., Leblanc, M. H., Smilovitch, M., Howlett, J., Logan, A. G., Floras, J. S., & Bradley, T. D.
Affiliations
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Sériès, Frédeéric
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
127
Issue
5
Pages
1507-1514
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131416048
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
chronic heart failure, central sleep apnea, obstructive sleep apnea, nocturnal oximetry, oxygen desaturation index, polysomnography, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Sleep Apnea, Central

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review