Dynamic Hyperinflation During Bronchoconstriction in Asthma
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between respiratory symptom intensity and quality and dynamic lung hyperinflation (DH) during induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Patients and methods Subjects with asthma (n = 116) underwent baseline spirometry and lung volume measurement followed by high-dose methacholine challenge testing (MCT) [maximum decrease in FEV(1) of 50% from baseline]. Dyspnea intensity (Borg scale) was measured after each dose of methacholine. Qualitative descriptors of breathlessness and functional residual capacity (FRC) were measured at the doses nearest to the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV (PC(20)) and at the highest dose of methacholine (maximum response). Results FEV(1) decreased by 24.7 +/- 0.7% (mean +/- SEM) at the dose nearest to PC(20) and by 46.1 +/- 1.1% at maximum response. Inspiratory capacity decreased by 0.62 +/- 0.04 L at the dose nearest to PC(20) and 1.06 +/- 0.06 L at maximum response. The descriptor clusters "inspiratory difficulty," "chest tightness," "unsatisfied inspiration," and "work" were selected at the dose nearest to PC(20) but were more frequently selected at maximum response (p Conclusions Four dominant qualities of dyspnea in asthma (inspiratory difficulty, chest tightness, unsatisfied inspiration, and work) were reported early in the course of MCT and evolved in parallel, becoming more prevalent at maximum response. Significant DH accompanied even mild…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thoracic dominant breathing is linked to asthma, COPD, heart failure and panic disorder.
“| Thoracic dominant breathing | 4 | [11, 47–49] | Asthma COPD Heart failure Panic disorder |”
From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [49]
Thoracic dominant breathing often occurs in patients with increasing ventilation needs such as cardiac or respiratory disease or decreased abdominal compliance such as morbid obesity, but in their absence it can be termed dysfunctional.
“This type of breathing often occurs in patients with increasing ventilation needs such as those with cardiac or respiratory disease or those with decreased abdominal compliance such as the morbidly obese, but in their absence it can be termed dysfunctional [11, 48, 49].”
From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Distinguishable Types of Dyspnea in Patients with Shortness of Breath
Simon, P. M., Schwartzstein, R. M., Weiss, J. W., Fencl, V., Teghtsoonian, M., & Weinberger, S. E. (1990) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/142.5.1009 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Descriptors of Breathlessness in Cardiorespiratory Diseases
Mahler, D. A., Harver, A., Lentine, T., Scott, J. A., Beck, K., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (1996) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912748 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parshall, M. B., Schwartzstein, R. M., Adams, L., Banzett, R. B., Manning, H. L., Bourbeau, J., Calverley, P. M., Gift, A. G., Harver, A., Lareau, S. C., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201111-2042st · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
Self-citationDysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification
Boulding, R., Stacey, R., Niven, R., & Fowler, S. J. (2016) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0088-2015 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Effect of respiratory muscle training in asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lista-Paz, A., Bouza Cousillas, L., Jácome, C., Fregonezi, G., Labata-Lezaun, N., Llurda-Almuzara, L., & Pérez-Bellmunt, A. (2023) · Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101691 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Williams, M., Cafarella, P., Olds, T., Petkov, J., & Frith, P. (2010) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.09-2498 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lougheed, M. D., Fisher, T., & O’Donnell, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1072-1081
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116008397
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
- Keywords
- asthma, bronchoconstriction, methacholine challenge, dyspnea, chest tightness, functional residual capacity, inspiratory capacity, airflow obstruction, respiratory sensation, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Airway Resistance, Inhalation, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Dyspnea, Female, Humans, Lung, Lung Compliance, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Plethysmography, Spirometry, Statistics as Topic, Work of Breathing, Bronchoconstriction, Methacholine Chloride
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review