Cited by 16Fungal Infections and StudiesSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchActinomycetales infections and treatment

Decreasing Incidence of Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis Among Piman and San Carlos Apache Indians

Sievers, Maurice L., Fisher, Jeffrey R.·1982·Chest

Abstract

Among Piman and San Carlos Apache Indians, the rates of disseminated disease and death from coccidioidomycosis have declined 67 percent (p less than 0.001) and 71 percent (p less than 0.01), respectively, between the first and second half of a 22-year observation period (1959-1980), despite a lack of significant change in the rate of primary infection (as determined by the coccidioidin skin test) between the two 11-year periods. The two tribal groups studied comprised 76 percent of the Indian population in the endemic area. More than 90 percent of Pimans and San Carlos Apaches have full Indian heritage, and almost all of them have been lifelong inhabitants of the endemic region. There is no evidence that genetic factors are responsible for the Indians' decrease in mortality and mortality from disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Improvements in housing and working conditions appear to have lessened the exposure to dust laden with C immitis, decreased the size of infecting inoculum, and, thereby, contributed to a decline in disseminated coccidiodomycosis among these native Americans, who have often been considered to have increased susceptibility to this fungal infection. Thus, the outcome of coccidioidal infection in American Indians seems to be largely determined by environmental influences. The possibility of decreasing disseminated disease rates by reducing the inhalation of arthroconidia also has important implications for other ethnic groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.82.4.455

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among AI/AN, case fatality rates trended down between 1959 and 1980, with unchanged coccidioidomycosis incidence rate over the same period.

    “AI/AN was reported to have an increased risk of coccidioidomycosis complications, but among this population, case fatality rates were shown to have trended down between 1959 and 1980, with unchanged coccidioidomycosis incidence rate over the same period, which may be explained by the change in the social, economic, environmental and the availability of new therapies for coccidioidomycosis during”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [151]

  • AI/AN was reported to have an increased risk of coccidioidomycosis complications.

    “AI/AN was reported to have an increased risk of coccidioidomycosis complications, but among this population, case fatality rates were shown to have trended down between 1959 and 1980, with unchanged coccidioidomycosis incidence rate over the same period, which may be explained by the change in the social, economic, environmental and the availability of new therapies for coccidioidomycosis during”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [151]

  • The trend in AI/AN case fatality rates may be explained by changes in social, economic, environmental factors and the availability of new therapies for coccidioidomycosis during that time period.

    “AI/AN was reported to have an increased risk of coccidioidomycosis complications, but among this population, case fatality rates were shown to have trended down between 1959 and 1980, with unchanged coccidioidomycosis incidence rate over the same period, which may be explained by the change in the social, economic, environmental and the availability of new therapies for coccidioidomycosis during”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [151]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sievers, M. L., & Fisher, J. R.
Affiliations
Phoenix Indian Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sievers, Maurice L.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-10
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
455-460
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094411221
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
disseminated coccidioidomycosis, Coccidioides immitis, Native Americans, incidence trends, mortality decline, coccidioidin skin test, environmental exposure, dust exposure, housing conditions, endemic fungal infection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arizona, Child, Child, Preschool, Coccidioidomycosis, Dust, Environmental Exposure, Female, Housing, Humans, Indians, North American, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Lung Diseases, Fungal, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Skin Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review