Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Double-Blind Placebo-controlled Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid in the Prevention of Gallstones during Weight Loss after Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

Williams, C. N., Gowan, R., Perey, Bernard J.·1993·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

One hundred and seven patients whose gallbladder was normal at the time of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) were considered for entry into a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study to determine the effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in preventing cholelithiasis during the period of weight loss. Twenty-one patients (20%) developed gallstones in the six-week period post-VBG and prior to randomization and were therefore excluded. Eighty-six patients were randomized at 6 weeks to active medication or placebo. Of these, 61 patients (71 %) completed the study. Twenty-five patients (29%) failed to complete the study because of incompliance, intolerance to the medication or pregnancy; 17 of these were in the active treatment group and eight were in the placebo group. None of the 27 patients treated with UDCA developed gallstones, whereas eight of 34 (24%) patients taking placebo developed gallstones. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0061). These results suggest that UDCA is fully effective in preventing gallstone formation following VBG in patients who follow the prescribed regimen.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1381/096089293765559278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Williams, C. N., Gowan, R., & Perey, B. J.
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
1993-08-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
257-259
ISSN
  • 1708-0428
  • 0960-8923
Cited by
41
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review