The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Comet Assay (Single-Cell Gel Test): A Sensitive Genotoxicity Test for the Detection of DNA Damage and Repair
Abstract
The comet assay or single-cell gel (SCG) test is becoming established as a useful technique for studying DNA damage and repair. In this microgel electrophoresis technique, a small number of cells suspended in a thin agarose gel on a microscope slide is lysed, electrophoresed, and stained with a fluorescent DNA binding dye. Cells with increased DNA damage display increased migration of chromosomal DNA from the nucleus toward the anode, which resembles the shape of a comet ( Fig. 1 ). In its alkaline version, which is mainly used, DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites become apparent, and the amount of DNA migration indicates the amount of DNA damage in the cell. The comet assay combines the simplicity of biochemical techniques for detecting DNA single-strand breaks and/or alkali-labile sites with the single-cell approach typical of cytogenetic assays. The advantages of the SCG test include its simple and rapid performance, its sensitivity for detecting DNA damage, the analysis of data at the level of the individual cell, the use of extremely small samples, and its applicability to virtually any eukaryote cell population. Apart from image analysis, which greatly facilitates and enhances the possibilities of comet measurements, the cost of performing the assay is extremely low. The comet assay has already been used in many studies to assess DNA damage and repair induced by various agents in a variety of cells in vitro and in vivo (for a review, see 1 , 2 ). Photomicrographs of human lymphocytes in the comet assay. ( A ) Untreated cell (control). ( B ) Cell exhibiting increased DNA migration after mutagen treatment. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing
Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J.-C., & Sasaki, Y. F. (2000) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::aid-em8>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 4,860
Self-citationRole of Free Radicals in the Toxicity of Airborne Fine Particulate Matter
Dellinger, B., Pryor, W. A., Cueto, R., Squadrito, G. L., Hegde, V., & Deutsch, W. A. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx010050x · Cited by 532
An overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation
Majtnerová, P., & Roušar, T. (2018) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4258-9 · Cited by 330
Phosphorylation of histone H2AX at M phase in human cells without DNA damage response
Ichijima, Y., Sakasai, R., Okita, N., Asahina, K., Mizutani, S., & Teraoka, H. (2005) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.164 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Speit, G., & Hartmann, A.
- Venue
- DNA Repair Protocols
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2003-11-14
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 203-212
- OpenAlex
- W2272429631
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Comet Assay (Single-Cell Gel Test): A Sensitive Genotoxicity Test for the Detection of DNA Damage and Repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1385/1-59259-675-4:203
- The paper
- Speit, G., & Hartmann, A. (2003). The Comet Assay (Single-Cell Gel Test): A Sensitive Genotoxicity Test for the Detection of DNA Damage and Repair. DNA Repair Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-675-4%3A203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.