Cited by 130Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

EMAP and EMAGE: A Framework for Understanding Spatially Organized Data

Baldock, Richard A., Bard, Jonathan B. L., Burger, Albert, Burton, Nicolas, Christiansen, Jeff, Feng, Guanjie, Hill, Bill, Houghton, Derek +9 more·2003·Neuroinformatics

Abstract

The Edinburgh MouseAtlas Project (EMAP) is a time-series of mouse-embryo volumetric models. The models provide a context-free spatial framework onto which structural interpretations and experimental data can be mapped. This enables collation, comparison, and query of complex spatial patterns with respect to each other and with respect to known or hypothesized structure. The atlas also includes a time-dependent anatomical ontology and mapping between the ontology and the spatial models in the form of delineated anatomical regions or tissues. The models provide a natural, graphical context for browsing and visualizing complex data. The Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Gene-Expression Database (EMAGE) is one of the first applications of the EMAP framework and provides a spatially mapped gene-expression database with associated tools for data mapping, submission, and query. In this article, we describe the underlying principles of the Atlas and the gene-expression database, and provide a practical introduction to the use of the EMAP and EMAGE tools, including use of new techniques for whole body gene-expression data capture and mapping.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/ni:1:4:309

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodents, brain- and transcriptome-wide cellular-resolution maps of transcript distributions are useful resources to complement genomic sequence data.

    “In rodents, brain- and transcriptome-wide, cellular-resolution maps of transcript distributions are widely useful resources to complement genomic sequence data1, 2, 3.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 130

Authors
Baldock, R. A., Bard, J. B. L., Burger, A., Burton, N., Christiansen, J., Feng, G., Hill, B., Houghton, D., Kaufman, M., Rao, J., Sharpe, J., Ross, A., Stevenson, P., Venkataraman, S., Waterhouse, A., Yang, Y., & Davidson, D. R.
Affiliations
Western General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Baldock, Richard A.
Venue
Neuroinformatics
Published
2003
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
309-326
ISSN
1539-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974717034
Cited by
130
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039928, HD39928-02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
mouse embryo, volumetric modeling, spatial data organization, anatomical ontology, gene expression mapping, spatial data visualization, mouse embryo development
MeSH terms
Animals, Atlases as Topic, Computer Graphics, Embryo, Mammalian, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Anatomic, Online Systems, Programming Languages, Gene Expression, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval, Computational Biology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review