EMAP and EMAGE: A Framework for Understanding Spatially Organized Data
Abstract
The Edinburgh MouseAtlas Project (EMAP) is a time-series of mouse-embryo volumetric models. The models provide a context-free spatial framework onto which structural interpretations and experimental data can be mapped. This enables collation, comparison, and query of complex spatial patterns with respect to each other and with respect to known or hypothesized structure. The atlas also includes a time-dependent anatomical ontology and mapping between the ontology and the spatial models in the form of delineated anatomical regions or tissues. The models provide a natural, graphical context for browsing and visualizing complex data. The Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Gene-Expression Database (EMAGE) is one of the first applications of the EMAP framework and provides a spatially mapped gene-expression database with associated tools for data mapping, submission, and query. In this article, we describe the underlying principles of the Atlas and the gene-expression database, and provide a practical introduction to the use of the EMAP and EMAGE tools, including use of new techniques for whole body gene-expression data capture and mapping.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In rodents, brain- and transcriptome-wide cellular-resolution maps of transcript distributions are useful resources to complement genomic sequence data.
“In rodents, brain- and transcriptome-wide, cellular-resolution maps of transcript distributions are widely useful resources to complement genomic sequence data1, 2, 3.”
From An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Baldock, R. A., Bard, J. B. L., Burger, A., Burton, N., Christiansen, J., Feng, G., Hill, B., Houghton, D., Kaufman, M., Rao, J., Sharpe, J., Ross, A., Stevenson, P., Venkataraman, S., Waterhouse, A., Yang, Y., & Davidson, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Western General Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Baldock, Richard A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuroinformatics
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-326
- ISSN
- 1539-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974717034
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Medical Research Council
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039928, HD39928-02)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- mouse embryo, volumetric modeling, spatial data organization, anatomical ontology, gene expression mapping, spatial data visualization, mouse embryo development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Atlases as Topic, Computer Graphics, Embryo, Mammalian, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Anatomic, Online Systems, Programming Languages, Gene Expression, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval, Computational Biology, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review