An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome
Open accessAbstract
Neuroanatomically precise, genome-wide maps of transcript distributions are critical resources to complement genomic sequence data and to correlate functional and genetic brain architecture. Here we describe the generation and analysis of a transcriptional atlas of the adult human brain, comprising extensive histological analysis and comprehensive microarray profiling of ∼900 neuroanatomically precise subdivisions in two individuals. Transcriptional regulation varies enormously by anatomical location, with different regions and their constituent cell types displaying robust molecular signatures that are highly conserved between individuals. Analysis of differential gene expression and gene co-expression relationships demonstrates that brain-wide variation strongly reflects the distributions of major cell classes such as neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and microglia. Local neighbourhood relationships between fine anatomical subdivisions are associated with discrete neuronal subtypes and genes involved with synaptic transmission. The neocortex displays a relatively homogeneous transcriptional pattern, but with distinct features associated selectively with primary sensorimotor cortices and with enriched frontal lobe expression. Notably, the spatial topography of the neocortex is strongly reflected in its molecular topography—the closer two cortical regions, the more similar their transcriptomes. This freely accessible online data resource forms a high-resolution transcriptional baseline for neurogenetic studies of normal and abnormal human brain function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 31 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
These region- and cell-type molecular signatures are highly conserved between individuals.
“that are highly conserved between individuals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Findingown data
The percentage of PSD genes with highly regional differential expression (31%) is significantly greater than the percentage observed across all genes (21%).
“a significantly greater percentage than that observed across all genes (21%, P < 10−6, Mann–Whitney U-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Tyrosine hydroxylase is enriched in the substantia nigra pars compacta, ventral tegmental area, hypothalamic supraoptic and preoptic nuclei, and locus ceruleus.
“tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is enriched in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNC), ventral tegmental area (VTA), and hypothalamic supraoptic and preoptic nuclei, as well as in the locus ceruleus”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Brain-wide transcriptional variation strongly reflects the distributions of major cell classes such as neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and microglia.
“brain-wide variation strongly reflects the distributions of major cell classes such as neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and microglia”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
No statistically significant hemispheric differences at the fine structural level were corroborated in both brains.
“no statistically significant hemispheric differences could be identified at this fine structural level that were corroborated in both brains (paired one-sided t-tests, P < 0.01, Benjamini–Hochberg (BH)-corrected).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Different brain regions and their constituent cell types have robust molecular signatures.
“different regions and their constituent cell types displaying robust molecular signatures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Findingcitation
Many synapse-associated Gene Ontology categories are enriched in the PSD gene set, even relative to PSD genes as a whole, including synapse, synaptic vesicle, synaptic transmission, neurophysiological process and receptor activity.
“many synapse-associated Gene Ontology (GO) categories13 were enriched in this gene set, even relative to the PSD genes as a whole, including synapse (GO: 0045202), synaptic vesicle (GO: 0008021), synaptic transmission (GO: 0007268), neurophysiological process (GO: 0050877) and receptor activity (GO: 0004872).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Huang da, W. Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols 4, 44–57 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Overall expression levels and fold changes between structures were strongly corroborated in all three brains.
“We found strong corroboration of overall expression levels and fold changes between structures in all three brains (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Regional enrichments of dopaminergic neurotransmission genes were conserved between the two brains.
“Regional enrichments were conserved between the two brains (note similar peaks in paired rows for Brain 1 and 2; Fig. 2a)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Differential expression relationships between structures were significantly correlated between the two brains (Pearson r = 0.46, P < 10−40).
“with a highly significant correlation in differential expression relationships between structures (Pearson r = 0.46, P < 10−40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
There was 91.4% overlap in expressed gene sets between the two brains.
“(91.4% overlap in expressed gene sets between brains)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Thirty-one per cent of PSD genes showed highly regional differential expression (fold change >5 between any pair of 170 structures, false discovery rate <0.01).
“Thirty-one per cent of PSD genes showed highly regional differential expression (Supplementary Methods 2 and Supplementary Table 3) (fold change >5 between any pair of 170 structures, false discovery rate <0.01)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
The neocortex has a relatively homogeneous transcriptional pattern.
“The neocortex displays a relatively homogeneous transcriptional pattern”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Transcriptional regulation in the adult human brain varies substantially by anatomical location.
“Transcriptional regulation varies enormously by anatomical location”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Findingown data
The spatial topography of the neocortex is strongly reflected in its molecular topography, such that closer cortical regions have more similar transcriptomes.
“the spatial topography of the neocortex is strongly reflected in its molecular topography— the closer two cortical regions, the more similar their transcriptomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Local neighbourhood relationships between fine anatomical subdivisions are associated with discrete neuronal subtypes and genes involved with synaptic transmission.
“Local neighbourhood relationships between fine anatomical subdivisions are associated with discrete neuronal subtypes and genes involved with synaptic transmission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Expression levels across anatomical structures were strongly correlated between the two brains (Pearson r = 0.98, P < 10−40).
“Expression levels across anatomical structures were strongly correlated between brains (Pearson r = 0.98, P < 10−40)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Genes related to dopaminergic neurotransmission show highly localized enrichment across brain structures, including genes for dopamine synthesis, packaging, degradation and postsynaptic signalling.
“Fig. 2a depicts the structural distribution of gene expression related to dopaminergic neurotransmission, illustrating the highly localized enrichment of genes associated with dopamine synthesis, packaging, degradation and postsynaptic signalling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
In each brain independently, 84% of unique transcripts on the microarrays (29,412 genes) were expressed in at least one structure.
“In each brain independently, 84% of unique transcripts on the microarrays (29,412, referred to as genes for this manuscript) were found to be expressed in at least one structure”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
The data generation pipeline produced a detailed quantitative map of transcript distribution across the entire brain.
“The output of the data generation pipeline described above is a detailed quantitative map of transcript distribution across the entire brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
The spatial organization of the first three principal components was highly correlated between brains, with Pearson r values of 0.71 for PC1, 0.51 for PC2, and 0.70 for PC3.
“The spatial organization of the first three principal components was highly correlated between brains (Pearsonr = 0.71 for PC1, 0.51 for PC2 and 0.70 for PC3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is significant, albeit less robust, variation in gene expression across cortical areas.
“there is significant, albeit less robust, variation in gene expression across cortical areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Exceptions to relative cortical homogeneity include the postcentral gyrus (primary sensory cortex), temporal pole (area 38) and primary visual cortex (area 17).
“Exceptions to this relative cortical homogeneity include the postcentral gyrus (primary sensory cortex), temporal pole (area 38) and primary visual cortex (area 17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Transcriptional relationships between samples recapitulate the spatial topography of the neocortex.
“the transcriptional relationships between samples recapitulate the spatial topography of the neocortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PC3 is primarily differential in frontal cortex compared to temporal and occipital cortex.
“PC3 is primarily differential in frontal cortex compared to temporal and occipital cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many genes show statistically significant variation between lobes or gyri at a lower threshold.
“many genes show statistically significant variation between lobes or gyri at a lower threshold”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Modules corresponding to broad neural cell types showed highly significant preservation compared to a previous study using human brain samples.
“Modules corresponding to broad neural cell types also showed highly significant preservation compared to a previous study using human brain samples (ref. 19 and data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Miller, J. A., Horvath, S. & Geschwind, D. H. Divergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12698–12703 (2010) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingcitation
Several modules (M1-M2) identify genes with enriched expression in neurons, based on overlap with neural-cell-type-enriched gene sets from previous studies.
“Several modules identify genes with enriched expression in neurons (M1–M2), based on overlap with neural-cell-type-enriched gene sets identified in previous studies18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Oldham, M. C. et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1271–1282 (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Subcortical regions with many well-defined nuclei show the greatest local heterogeneity, including the myelencephalon, mesencephalon, pons, hippocampus and hypothalamus.
“In contrast, subcortical regions with many well-defined nuclei show the greatest local heterogeneity, including the myelencephalon, mesencephalon, pons, hippocampus and hypothalamus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
One module with striking anatomical specificity for the paraventricular thalamus and central glial substance corresponded to expression in the ventricular ependymal lining and choroid plexus.
“one module with striking anatomical specificity for the paraventricular thalamus and central glial substance (asterisks in M5 eigengene histogram, Fig. 3c) corresponded to expression in the ventricular ependymal lining and choroid plexus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Regional transcriptional signatures are highly conserved between the two brains assayed.
“Regional transcriptional signatures are highly conserved between the two brains assayed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cytoarchitecturally discrete hippocampal subdivisions (dentate gyrus, CA fields, and subiculum) have distinctive gene expression patterns that are robust enough to cluster like-samples together while separating the subdivisions from one another.
“cytoarchitecturally discrete subdivisions of the hippocampus (dentate gyrus, CA fields and subiculum) showed distinctive expression patterns sufficiently robust to cluster together like-samples while distinguishing subdivisions from one another”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Human CALB1 expression differs from that in mouse and rhesus monkey, where CALB1 is robustly expressed in CA1 and CA2 in addition to the dentate gyrus.
“expression in human differs from that in mouse (Fig. 5d) and rhesus monkey (Fig. 5e), where CALB1 is robustly expressed in CA1 and CA2 in addition to dentate gyrus.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The current manuscript describes a human-specific pattern for CALB1 in the hippocampus compared to mouse and rhesus monkey.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Bernard, A. et al. Transcriptional architecture of the primate neocortex. Neuron 73, 1083–1099 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
These gene sets are enriched for cellular organelles and housekeeping functions, such as ribosome, mitochondrion and metabolism.
“Not surprisingly, these gene sets are enriched for cellular organelles and ‘housekeeping’ functions (for example, ribosome, mitochondrion, metabolism).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
CALB1 cellular specificity for dentate gyrus granule neurons was demonstrated by in situ hybridization on an independent adult brain specimen.
“cellular specificity for dentate gyrus granule neurons is demonstrated on an independent adult brain specimen by ISH”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Complex differential relationships were observed between specific nuclei in subcortical structures.
“In contrast, complex differential relationships were observed between specific nuclei in subcortical structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Figure 4a illustrates the neuroanatomical molecular blueprint common to both brains, based on 11,414 genes passing criteria in both brains.
“Figure 4a illustrates the resulting neuroanatomical molecular ‘blueprint’ common to both brains, by plotting the number of genes differentially expressed between each pair of structures based on the 11,414 genes passing these criteria in both brains”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingcitation
A large percentage of common differentially expressed transcripts (48%, or 5,500 probes) are poorly annotated, including probes not mapped to the human genome, mapped to contig sequences, or not mapped to known GENCODE genes.
“a large percentage of these common differentially expressed transcripts (48%, or 5,500 probes) are poorly annotated, including probes not mapped to the human genome (HG19; http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway), mapped to contig sequences, or not mapped to known GENCODE genes21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol. 7, (suppl. 1)1–9 (2006) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Gene modules were frequently related to primary neural cell types and molecular functions.
“Gene modules were frequently related to primary neural cell types and molecular functions (Fig. 3b, c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
It is possible to identify genes with either brain-wide (global) or within-structure (local) ubiquity.
“It is also possible to identify genes with either brain-wide (global) or within structure (local) ubiquity (Supplementary Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
The 1,000 genes with the most significant expression variation between 56 gyri in both brains were identified.
“We first identified the 1,000 genes displaying the most significant variation in expression between 56 gyri in both brains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The primary motor cortex in the precentral gyrus is delineated by selective enrichment of neurofilament proteins NEFL, NEFM and NEFH.
“the primary motor cortex in the precentral gyrus, the origin of the longest range projection neurons, is delineated by selective enrichment of neurofilament proteins NEFL, NEFM and NEFH”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Visual cortex enrichment was confirmed by in situ hybridization for several synaptic transmission-associated genes highly correlated to PC1.
“Confirmation of the visual cortex enrichment by ISH for several synaptic transmission-associated genes highly correlated to PC1 is shown in Supplementary Fig. 7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The human neocortex shows a remarkable degree of transcriptional uniformity compared to other brain regions.
“we find a remarkable degree of transcriptional uniformity compared to other brain regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PC2 has areal selectivity for posterior orbital, paraolfactory, and subcallosal gyri in the frontal lobe, the temporal pole, and the primary visual cortex.
“PC2 has areal selectivity for posterior orbital, paraolfactory and subcallosal gyri in the frontal lobe, the temporal pole, and the primary visual cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PC1 is associated with primary sensorimotor cortices, with relative differential expression in precentral, postcentral, Heschl's gyrus, and primary and secondary visual areas.
“PC1 is associated with primary sensorimotor cortices, with relative differential expression in precentral (motor) and postcentral (somatosensory) cortex, Heschl’s gyrus (primary auditory) and primary and secondary visual areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes in the neuron-enriched modules are enriched in the neocortex and in particular cortical divisions.
“Genes in these modules are enriched in the neocortex (fifth row in Fig. 3b), and in particular cortical divisions as shown in eigengene plots (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
CALB1 is strongly selective for the dentate gyrus relative to other hippocampal subdivisions in both brains.
“the calcium-binding protein CALB1 has strong selectivity for the dentate gyrus relative to other hippocampal subdivisions in both brains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most differentially expressed 10% of PSD genes between any pair of structures comprised 74 genes with at least a 10.6-fold difference.
“Expression patterns for the most differentially expressed 10% of these PSD genes between any pair of structures are displayed in Fig. 2b (74 genes with at least a 10.6-fold difference).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
Differential expression between cortical regions is much less pronounced than between other brain regions.
“highly differential expression between cortical regions is much less pronounced than between other brain regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most genes with high variation across brain regions are not selective for a single major brain region; rather, they are expressed in multiple regions and non-uniformly within these regions.
“Most genes with high variation across brain regions are not selective for a single major brain region; rather, they are expressed in multiple regions and non-uniformly within these regions (Supplementary Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
The relative positions of samples in the MDS plot mirror the actual positions of the gyri in the physical brain.
“The relative positions of samples in the MDS plot mirror the actual positions of the gyri in the physical brain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Robust regional clustering was also observed in the mesencephalon, pons, and myelencephalon.
“Similarly robust regional clustering was observed in the mesencephalon, pons and myelencephalon”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Samples from the CA3 and CA4 hippocampal subfields were not discriminable by their expression profiles.
“samples from the CA3 and CA4 subfields were not discriminable (intermixing in Fig. 5a)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Individual cortical samples showed strong transcriptional similarities to neighbouring samples such that the topography of the neocortex as a whole can in part be reconstructed based on their molecular profiles.
“individual cortical samples showed such strong transcriptional similarities to neighbouring samples that the topography of the neocortex as a whole can, in part, be reconstructed based on their molecular profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately 10% of these poorly annotated transcripts had very high correlation with the co-expression modules (Pearson r > 0.7).
“Approximately 10% of these transcripts had very high correlation with the co-expression modules identified above (Pearson r > 0.7; Supplementary Table 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingown data
The magnitude of differential expression between pairs of structures is strongly correlated with the number of differentially expressed genes between these structures (Pearson r = 0.62, P < 10−16).
“The magnitude of differential expression between pairs of structures is also strongly correlated with the number of differentially expressed genes between these structures (Pearson r = 0.62, P < 10−16; Supplementary Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingreasoning
Hub genes and enriched GO terms for the neuron-enriched modules are associated with neuronal structure and function and energy metabolism.
“Hub genes and enriched GO terms for these modules are associated with neuronal structure and function and energy metabolism, as might be expected given the high metabolic demands of neurons (Supplementary Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Findingreasoning
Some primary sensory and motor regions have distinct whole-transcriptome signatures.
“some primary sensory and motor regions do have distinct whole-transcriptome signatures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The online data resource provides a high-resolution transcriptional baseline for neurogenetic studies of normal and abnormal human brain function.
“This freely accessible online data resource forms a high-resolution transcriptional baseline for neurogenetic studies of normal and abnormal human brain function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Premisecitation
These regional enrichments were consistent with previous studies.
“and were consistent with previous studies9, 10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Bentivoglio, M. & Morelli, M. in Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Dopamine (eds Dunnett, S. B., Bentivoglio, M., Bjorklund, A. & Hokfelt, T. ) Ch. I 1–107 (Elsevier, 2005)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Hurd, Y. L. & Hall, H. in Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. (Dopamine) (eds Dunnett, S.B., Bentivoglio, M., Bjorklund, A., & Hokfelt, T. ) Ch. IX 525–571 (Elsevier, 2005)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
No human counterpart to rodent brain-wide cellular-resolution transcriptome maps existed at the time.
“there has been no human counterpart so far”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent studies had analysed transcriptional dynamics during human brain development only in a small number of relatively coarse brain regions.
“Several important recent studies have begun to analyse transcriptional dynamics during human brain development4, 5, although only in a small number of relatively coarse brain regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Kang, H. J. et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Colantuoni, C. et al. Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature 478, 519–523 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Targeted large-scale in situ hybridization data sets were generated to complement and validate the microarray data.
“To complement and validate the microarray data, several targeted, large-scale in situ hybridization (ISH) data sets were generated using a high-throughput ISH platform1, 8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Zeng, H. et al. Large-scale cellular-resolution gene profiling in human neocortex reveals species-specific molecular signatures. Cell 149, 483–496 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Remarkably few differences are seen at this fold change threshold across the neocortex and cerebellum, reflecting their stereotyped repetitive cytoarchitecture.
“Remarkably few differences are seen at this fold change threshold across the neocortex (Fig. 4a, upper left) and cerebellum (lower right), reflecting their stereotyped repetitive cytoarchitecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Interpretationown data
Gene expression profiles substantially determine position on the cortical sheet.
“Therefore, gene expression profiles substantially determine position on the cortical sheet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A number of the most differentially expressed PSD-associated genes appear to be synthesized by glia, as indicated by the structural distribution of oligodendrocytes and presence of myelin-associated genes such as MOG and MBP in the gene cluster.
“a number of the most differentially expressed PSD-associated genes seem to be synthesized by glia, an observation made obvious by the stereotyped structural distribution of oligodendrocytes in white matter and other brain regions and the presence of well known myelin-associated genes (for example, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, MOG; myelin basic protein, MBP) in this gene cluster”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Interpretationreasoning
The high recapitulation of gene expression patterns across all three brains indicates that the basic transcriptional blueprint is robust across individuals.
“the high recapitulation of gene expression patterns across all three brains indicates that the basic transcriptional blueprint is robust across individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These data show remarkable regional variation in synaptic gene expression that probably underlies functional distinctions between regions.
“Overall, these data show remarkable regional variation in synaptic gene expression that probably underlies functional distinctions between regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Interpretationcitation
The transcriptional uniformity of the neocortex apparently reflects the similarity in laminar architecture across the entire neocortex.
“apparently reflecting the similarity in laminar architecture across the entire neocortex28”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] DeFelipe, J. & Jones, E. G. Cajal on the Cerebral Cortex: an Annotated Translation of the Complete Writings (Oxford Univ. Press, 1988)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
These correlations provide anatomical guilt-by-association annotation of previously unknown genes for selective roles in striatal and myelin function.
“providing anatomical ‘guilt-by-association’ annotation of these genes of previously unknown function for selective roles in striatal and myelin function, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Interpretationreasoning
The distinct whole-transcriptome signatures of some primary sensory and motor regions are probably related to their specialized cellular and functional architecture.
“probably related to their specialized cellular and functional architecture”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
CA4 is not a functionally distinct subfield from CA3.
“consistent with the view that CA4 is not a functionally distinct subfield from CA322”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Amaral, D. G. & Insausti, R. in The Human Nervous System (ed. Paxinos, G. ) 771–755 (Academic, 1990)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A major feature of the adult brain transcriptome profiled in this manner is that anatomical variation reflects the cellular make-up of different brain regions, both neuronal and non-neuronal.
“Thus, a major feature of the adult brain transcriptome profiled in this manner is the degree to which anatomical variation reflects the cellular make-up of different brain regions, both neuronal and non-neuronal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
- Premisecitation
WGCNA can identify gene expression patterns related to specific cell types such as neurons and glia from heterogeneous samples such as whole human cortex, due to distinct transcriptional profiles and variation in relative proportions.
“This method can identify gene expression patterns related to specific cell types such as neurons and glia from heterogeneous samples such as whole human cortex18, due to the highly distinct transcriptional profiles of these cell types and variation in their relative proportions across samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Oldham, M. C. et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1271–1282 (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 22
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe neocortex has distinct transcriptional features associated selectively with primary sensorimotor cortices and with enriched frontal lobe expression.
“with distinct features associated selectively with primary sensorimotor cortices and with enriched frontal lobe expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne hundred and seventy distinct structures were assayed at least once in both brains, and 146 structures were assayed twice or more.
“One-hundred and seventy distinct structures were assayed at least once in both brains, and 146 structures twice or more (Supplementary Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne highly regionalized neuron-related module (M6) was enriched in the striatum, with DRD1 as a hub gene.
“One highly regionalized neuron-related module (M6) was enriched in the striatum (the dopamine receptorDRD1 in Fig. 2a is a hub gene).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe gene modules identified in Brain 1 were well conserved in Brain 2 as a whole, both at the level of regional gene expression patterns and by a module preservation index.
“The gene modules identified in Brain 1 were well conserved in Brain 2 as a whole (Fig. 3b), both at the level of regional gene expression patterns (third row) and as measured by a module preservation index (fourth row) using a summary Z-statistic as described previously20.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Langfelder, P., Luo, R., Oldham, M. C. & Horvath, S. Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001057 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe results in Fig. 4b bear strong similarity to the plot in Fig. 4a, with the neocortex and cerebellum displaying the least internal heterogeneity.
“The results in Fig. 4b bear strong similarity to the plot in Fig. 4a, again with the neocortex and cerebellum displaying the least internal heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataApplied to the entire 911 sample set from Brain 1, genes were grouped into well-defined co-expression modules with specific anatomical distributions, consistent with previous studies.
“Applied to the entire 911 sample set from Brain 1, genes were grouped into well-defined co-expression modules with specific anatomical distributions (Fig. 3a, b), consistent with previous studies in brain tissues18, 19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Oldham, M. C. et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1271–1282 (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Miller, J. A., Horvath, S. & Geschwind, D. H. Divergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12698–12703 (2010) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe relative position of each lobe's samples reflects cortical topography, with the frontal pole and occipital striate cortex at opposite ends and precentral gyrus near postcentral gyrus.
“the relative position of each lobe’s samples reflects the cortical topography, with the frontal pole and occipital striate cortex at opposite ends, precentral gyrus near postcentral gyrus, and so on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSamples from each lobe group together, and the relative positions of the lobes are anatomically correct.
“Not only do samples from each lobe group together, but the relative positions of the lobes are anatomically correct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe globus pallidus and striatum have highly distinct profiles, as do several specific subcortical regions including the midbrain raphe, pontine nuclei and inferior olivary complex.
“The globus pallidus and striatum have highly distinct profiles, as do several specific subcortical regions including the midbrain raphe, pontine nuclei and inferior olivary complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther modules showed subcortical enrichment and correspond to expression in different types of glia (M8-M12), including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.
“Other modules showed subcortical enrichment and correspond to expression in different types of glia (M8–M12), including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe MDS distance effect is strongest when limited to genes differential between gyri, but can also be seen using the entire ~30,000 gene set, achieving a fit of 12.48% (P < 10−4).
“This effect is strongest when limited to genes that are differential between gyri as above, but can also be seen using the entire ~30,000 gene set, achieving a fit of 12.48% between native and MDS coordinates (P < 10−4, Supplementary Fig. 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMDS-based sample correlations vary nearly linearly with 3D physical distance, with a goodness of fit between native and MDS coordinates of 28.36% (P < 10−4).
“MDS-based sample correlations vary nearly linearly with 3D physical distance (Fig. 6e, inset), with a goodness of fit between native and MDS coordinates of 28.36% (P < 10−4, Supplementary Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first three principal components had striking selectivity for specific cortical regions and were generally reproducible across both brains.
“the first three principal components had striking selectivity for specific cortical regions (samples ordered by lobe and roughly rostral to caudal within each lobe) and were generally reproducible across both brains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first three principal components accounted for specific variance percentages in Brain 1 and Brain 2: PC1 58% and 42%, PC2 10% and 11%, PC3 5% and 8%, respectively.
“These first three components accounted for a large amount of the variance (PC1: 58% in Brain 1, 42% in Brain 2; PC2: 10% in Brain 1, 11% in Brain 2; PC3: 5% in Brain 1, 8% in Brain 2; Supplementary Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataDifferential expression across hippocampal subfields was validated by in situ hybridization.
“Differential expression across hippocampal subfields could be validated by ISH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThirty-eight transcripts demonstrated high correlation with the striatal module (M6), and 87 transcripts with the oligodendrocyte-associated module (M12).
“38 transcripts demonstrated high correlation with the striatal module (M6), and 87 transcripts with the oligodendrocyte-associated module (M12; Fig. 3c)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConservation and divergence in brain function between humans and other species provide essential information for understanding drug action, which is often poorly conserved across species.
“conservation and divergence in brain function between humans and other species provide essential information for the understanding of drug action, which is often poorly conserved across species6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Markou, A., Chiamulera, C., Geyer, M. A., Tricklebank, M. & Steckler, T. Removing obstacles in neuroscience drug discovery: the future path for animal models. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 74–89 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis percentage is consistent with the percentage of genes expressed in mouse brain by ISH (80%) and fetal human brain by microarrays (76%).
“consistent with the percentage of genes expressed in mouse brain by ISH (80%; ref. 1) and fetal human brain by microarrays (76%; ref. 11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Johnson, M. B. et al. Functional and evolutionary insights into human brain development through global transcriptome analysis. Neuron 62 494–509 S0896–6273(09)00286–4 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis absence of hemispheric differences is consistent with a recent study of developing human neocortex that failed to identify hemispheric differences.
“this finding is consistent with a recent study of developing human neocortex that failed to identify hemispheric differences despite extensive efforts using microarrays and quantitative PCR11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Johnson, M. B. et al. Functional and evolutionary insights into human brain development through global transcriptome analysis. Neuron 62 494–509 S0896–6273(09)00286–4 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn rodents, brain- and transcriptome-wide cellular-resolution maps of transcript distributions are useful resources to complement genomic sequence data.
“In rodents, brain- and transcriptome-wide, cellular-resolution maps of transcript distributions are widely useful resources to complement genomic sequence data1, 2, 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Diez-Roux, G. et al. A high-resolution anatomical atlas of the transcriptome in the mouse embryo. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000582 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Baldock, R. A. et al. EMAP and EMAGE: a framework for understanding spatially organized data. Neuroinformatics 1, 309–325 (2003) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe human excitatory postsynaptic density contains 740 genes.
“we examined the 740 genes identified in the human excitatory postsynaptic density (PSD12)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Bayes, A. et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nature Neurosci. 14, 19–21 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenGyral patterns do not correlate perfectly with either cytoarchitectural or functional cortical parcellation.
“gyral patterns do not correlate perfectly with either cytoarchitectural or functional cortical parcellation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenRNA quality was tested and specimens with an RNA integrity number greater than 6 were used.
“testing for RNA quality (RNA integrity number >6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNeurofilament proteins NEFL, NEFM and NEFH are frequently enriched in long-range projection neurons.
“which are frequently enriched in long-range projection neurons14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Hof, P. R., Nimchinsky, E. A. & Morrison, J. H. Neurochemical phenotype of corticocortical connections in the macaque monkey: quantitative analysis of a subset of neurofilament protein-immunoreactive projection neurons in frontal, parietal, temporal, and cingulate cortices. J. Comp. Neurol. 362, 109–133 (1995) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSynapse-associated genes clustered into groups enriched in specific regions, indicating a diverse set of excitatory synapse subtypes.
“The synapse-associated genes clustered into groups enriched in specific regions, indicative of a diverse set of excitatory synapse subtypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe two individuals assayed were males of similar age and ethnicity and therefore do not capture population or sex diversity.
“These two individuals were males of similar age and ethnicity and therefore do not capture population or sex diversity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe relative homogeneity of the two largest neuronal structures (cerebellar cortex and cortex) is striking and suggests an evolutionary expansion of a canonical cortical blueprint.
“the relative homogeneity of the two largest neuronal structures, with ~69 billion (cerebellar cortex) and ~16 billion (cortex) neurons out of the 86 billion neurons in the human brain33, is striking and suggests an evolutionary expansion of a canonical cortical blueprint34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Herculano-Houzel, S. The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3, 31 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Douglas, R. J. & Martin, K. A. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 419–451 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis suggests that many genes may be quite pleiotropic with respect to brain function, and that local gene regulation in specific cytoarchitectural nuclei is the most important level of resolution.
“This suggests that many genes may be quite pleiotropic with respect to brain function, and that local gene regulation in specific cytoarchitectural nuclei is the most important level of resolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe high degree of similarity between the two brains is suggestive of a strong underlying common blueprint for the human brain transcriptome and is consistent with other recent studies of human neocortical gene expression.
“this high degree of similarity is suggestive of a strong underlying common blueprint for the human brain transcriptome and is consistent with other recent studies of human neocortical gene expression4, 5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Kang, H. J. et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Colantuoni, C. et al. Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature 478, 519–523 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataSpecimens used for profiling had no known neuropsychiatric or neuropathological history.
“specimens with no known neuropsychiatric or neuropathological history were collected”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The two or three clinically unremarkable adult male brains studied are sufficiently representative of the adult human brain for the atlas's general conclusions.
“Two complete normal male brains were analysed from donors aged 24 and 39 years”
“in a small number of high-quality, clinically unremarkable brains”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microarray transcript levels measured in post-mortem brain tissue reflect the in vivo transcriptional state of the corresponding brain regions.
“RNA was isolated from each sample and used to generate labelled cRNA probes for hybridization to custom 64K Agilent microarrays.”
“The output of the data generation pipeline described above is a detailed quantitative map of transcript distribution across the entire brain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The primary feature distinguishing the human brain from other species is the enormous expansion of the neocortex relative to total brain volume.
“The primary feature that distinguishes the human brain from that of other species is the enormous expansion of the neocortex relative to total brain volume.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AHBA data were corrected for batch effects and normalized to the 75% quantile, and BSS data were quantile normalized.
“The AHBA data were corrected for batch effects and normalized to the 75% quantile, as previously described (Hawrylycz et al., 2012). BSS data also were quantile normalized.”
From Aerobic glycolysis in the human brain is associated with development and neotenous gene expression (2014) · cites this paper as Hawrylycz et al., 2012
The Methods sections on Sample processing and Microarray data analysis describe how the AHBA microarrays were generated and analyzed, but do not specify batch-effect correction or normalization to the 75th quantile. Searches for “batch effect,” “quantile,” and “75% quantile” found no passage establishing those steps. The citation is attached to the AHBA statement; the separate BSS normalization statement is not attributed to this source. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Allen Brain Institute and BrainSpan have evaluated spatial and temporal transcriptomes.
“Recent important advances include the evaluation of spatial and temporal transcriptomes by the Allen Brain Institute and BrainSpan8,11–13”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
When evaluating co-expression across brain regions, hubs in modules associated with specific regions, such as the cerebellum, are usually markers for predominant cell types, such as granule cells.
“For example, when evaluating co-expression across brain regions, hubs in modules that are associated with specific regions, such as the cerebellum, are usually markers for predominant cell types, such as granule cells11,12,26,32.”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
Network approaches are particularly useful for relating whole-tissue-level changes to high-resolution experiments.
“Network approaches are particularly useful for relating whole-tissue-level changes to data from these high-resolution experiments11–13,26 (FIG. 2a).”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
Network analysis can identify multiple levels of molecular organization within the hierarchy of brain region, cell type, organelle and molecular pathways using only transcriptional data, and can enable integration with other information.
“A major advantage of network analysis over DGE analysis is that it can identify multiple levels of molecular organization within the hierarchy of brain region, cell type, organelle and molecular pathways using only transcriptional data, and can thus enable integration with other information, such as known pathway annotations, protein interactions and other molecular profiling data11,12,26,27”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
That study found genes in these modules have dynamic developmental trajectories, demonstrating a role for ASD risk genes in neural development.
“Moreover, this study found that genes in these modules have dynamic developmental trajectories, demonstrating a role for ASD risk genes in neural development.”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
The human brain transcriptome has a reproducible structure.
“Given that the human brain transcriptome has a reproducible structure12,26”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
The first study to map risk genes onto transcriptional networks identified co-expression modules with cell type-specific and region-specific expression patterns using nearly 1,000 adult brain regions, and identified neuronal gene-enriched modules containing ASD candidate genes and ASD GWAS signals.
“The first study to do this identified co-expression modules that had cell type-specific and region-specific expression patterns using nearly 1,000 adult brain regions12,109, and identified neuronal gene-enriched modules containing ASD candidate genes and ASD GWAS signals.”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
About 95% of RefSeq genes are expressed in developing neocortex, compared with 84% in adult using these arrays.
“Approximately 95% of RefSeq genes are expressed in developing neocortex, compared with 84% identified using these arrays in adult23.”
From Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain (2014) · cites this paper as [23]
The present atlas offers transcriptome data from prenatal human specimens that are usually hard to obtain for research, extending earlier molecular atlases of mouse and adult human brain.
“The atlas of the mid-gestational human brain described here, part of the BrainSpan Atlas of the Developing Human Brain, builds on digital molecular brain atlasing efforts in mouse20,22,24 and adult human23 by providing transcriptome resources on prenatal specimens typically inaccessible for research.”
From Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain (2014) · cites this paper as [23]
Transcription profiles in the adult neocortex are relatively homogeneous throughout the cortex, although some heterogeneity exists.
“Surprisingly, it turned out that transcription profiles in the adult neocortex are relatively homogeneous throughout the cortex, although a certain level of heterogeneity still does exist (Hawrylycz et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2011; Pletikos et al., 2014)”
From Genetic Changes Shaping the Human Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Hawrylycz et al., 2012
RNA expression studies across the mammalian brain have shown significant differences in the transcriptome between neuronal cell types, brain regions, developmental stages, and species.
“Each have reinforced findings of significant differences in the transcriptome between neuronal cell-types, brain regions, developmental stages, and species.”
From Decoding neuroproteomics: integrating the genome, translatome and functional anatomy (2014) · cites this paper as [12]
In situ hybridization and microarray data, for example the Allen Brain Atlases, have established that mRNA transcripts encoding these five NPPs and that many other NPPs and NP-GPCR genes are expressed differentially in many brain regions.
“In situ hybridization and microarray data, for example the Allen Brain Atlases (Hawrylycz et al., 2012; Lein et al., 2007), have also established that mRNA transcripts encoding these five NPPs and that many other NPPs and NP-GPCR genes are expressed differentially in many brain regions.”
From Single-cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks (2019) · cites this paper as Hawrylycz et al., 2012
Human neocortex shows variations in transcriptional patterns that are consistent across individuals and are correlated with topographical position across the cortical sheet.
“Despite its relative homogeneity compared to other brain regions, human neocortex shows variations in transcriptional patterns that are consistent across individuals and are correlated with topographical position across the cortical sheet3.”
From Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
Some of these networks appear to represent co-expression in broad cell classes such as telencephalic neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and vasculature.
“Although the anatomical sampling in this study was not cell type-specific, some of these networks appear to represent co-expression in broad cell classes such as telencephalic neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and vasculature, as observed previously3, 5.”
From Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
The thalamic-neocortex separation is conserved in mice and recapitulated in independent single-cell, bulk and microarray data in both mice and humans.
“We found that the thalamic–neocortex separation is conserved in mice and recapitulated both this divide and thalamic marker genes in independent single-cell, bulk and microarray data in both mice and humans8,39,40,43”
From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
A comprehensive molecular characterization of region-specific differences in Alzheimer's disease is currently lacking.
“Although some brain regions relevant to AD have been studied individually at scale or jointly in samples from a few individuals8–16, a comprehensive molecular characterization of region-specific differences in AD is currently lacking”
From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890 · see citing works
Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq
Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L., & Wold, B. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1226 · Cited by 13,696 · see citing works
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783 · see citing works
A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2005) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1128 · Cited by 5,684 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain
Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05453 · Cited by 5,572 · see citing works
Self-citationHandbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy
Stern, C. D. (1986) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/0197-0186(86)90021-5 · Cited by 4,159 · see citing works
Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,412 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain
Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Li, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10523 · Cited by 2,084 · see citing works
Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE
Hosack, D. A., Dennis, G., Sherman, B. T., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r70 · Cited by 1,950 · see citing works
NEURONAL CIRCUITS OF THE NEOCORTEX
Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152 · Cited by 1,886 · see citing works
Transcriptomic Analysis of Autistic Brain Reveals Convergent Molecular Pathology
Voineagu, I., Wang, X., Johnston, P., Lowe, J. K., Tian, Y., Horvath, S., Mill, J., Cantor, R. M., Blencowe, B. J., & Geschwind, D. H. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10110 · Cited by 1,874 · see citing works
Self-citationThe human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009 · Cited by 1,778 · see citing works
Paxinos, G., & Jürgen, K. (2004) · Cited by 1,482 · see citing works
Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures
Shattuck, D. W., Mirza, M., Adisetiyo, V., Hojatkashani, C., Salamon, G., Narr, K. L., Poldrack, R. A., Bilder, R. M., & Toga, A. W. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Glutamatergic synapses on oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus
Bergles, D. E., Roberts, J. D. B., Somogyi, P., & Jahr, C. E. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012083 · Cited by 1,062 · see citing works
Is My Network Module Preserved and Reproducible?
Langfelder, P., Luo, R., Oldham, M. C., & Horvath, S. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057 · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional organization of the transcriptome in human brain
Oldham, M. C., Konopka, G., Iwamoto, K., Langfelder, P., Kato, T., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2207 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Self-citationTemporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex
Colantuoni, C., Lipska, B. K., Ye, T., Hyde, T. M., Tao, R., Leek, J. T., Colantuoni, E. A., Elkahloun, A. G., Herman, M. M., Weinberger, D. R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10524 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE
Harrow, J., Denoeud, F., Frankish, A., Reymond, A., Chen, C.-K., Chrast, J., Lagarde, J., Gilbert, J. G., Storey, R., Swarbreck, D., et al. (2006) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s4 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Horvath, S., Zhang, B., Carlson, M., Lu, K. V., Zhu, S., Felciano, R. M., Laurance, M. F., Zhao, W., Qi, S., Chen, Z., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608396103 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Self-citationA High-Resolution Anatomical Atlas of the Transcriptome in the Mouse Embryo
Diez-Roux, G., Banfi, S., Sultan, M., Geffers, L., Anand, S., Rozado, D., Magen, A., Canidio, E., Pagani, M., Peluso, I., et al. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000582 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Johnson, M. B., Kawasawa, Y. I., Mason, C. E., Krsnik, Ž., Coppola, G., Bogdanović, D., Geschwind, D. H., Mane, S. M., State, M. W., & Šestan, N. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.027 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Self-citationCharacterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density
Bayés, À., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Collins, M. O., Croning, M. D. R., Whittle, I. R., Choudhary, J. S., & Grant, S. G. N. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2719 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Self-citationDivergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways
Miller, J. A., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914257107 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Self-citationAnatomical mapping of functional activation in stereotactic coordinate space.
Evans, A. C., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Collins, D. L., Worsley, K., Dai, W.-Q., Milot, S., Meyer, E., & Bub, D. (1992) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/1053-8119(92)90006-9 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Zeng, H., Shen, E. H., Hohmann, J. G., Oh, S. W., Bernard, A., Royall, J. J., Glattfelder, K. J., Sunkin, S. M., Morris, J. A., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.052 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Self-citationEGASP: the human ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project.
Guigó, R., Flicek, P., Abril, J. F., Reymond, A., Lagarde, J., Denœud, F., Antonarakis, S. E., Ashburner, M., Bajić, V. B., Birney, E., et al. (2006) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s2 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Removing Obstacles in Neuroscience Drug Discovery: The Future Path for Animal Models
Markou, A., Chiamulera, C., Geyer, M. A., Tricklebank, M., & Steckler, T. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2008.173 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Ameur, A., Zaghlool, A., Halvardson, J., Wetterbom, A., Gyllensten, U., Cavelier, L., & Feuk, L. (2011) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2143 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
A Transcriptomic Atlas of Mouse Neocortical Layers
Belgard, T. G., Marques, A. C., Oliver, P. L., Abaan, H. Ö., Sirey, T., Hoerder‐Suabedissen, A., García‐Moreno, F., Molnár, Z., Margulies, E. H., & Ponting, C. P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.039 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Zilles, K. (2002) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0924-977x(02)00108-6 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Transcriptional Architecture of the Primate Neocortex
Bernard, A., Lubbers, L. S., Tanis, K. Q., Luo, R., Podtelezhnikov, A. A., Finney, E. M., McWhorter, M. M. E., Serikawa, K., Lemon, T., Morgan, R., et al. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.002 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationCajal on the Cerebral Cortex: An Annotated Translation of the Complete Writings
Glickstein, M. (1989) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-110-10-851_3 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Hof, P. R., Nimchinsky, E. A., & Morrison, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903620107 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationEMAP and EMAGE: A Framework for Understanding Spatially Organized Data
Baldock, R. A., Bard, J. B. L., Burger, A., Burton, N., Christiansen, J., Feng, G., Hill, B., Houghton, D., Kaufman, M., Rao, J., et al. (2003) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1385/ni:1:4:309 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Digital Atlasing and Standardization in the Mouse Brain
Hawrylycz, M., Baldock, R., Burger, A., Hashikawa, T., Johnson, G. A., Martone, M. E., Ng, L., Lau, C., Larsen, S. D., Nissanov, J., et al. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001065 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hurd, Y. L. & Hall, H. in Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. (Dopamine) (eds Dunnett, S.B., Bentivoglio, M., Bjorklund, A., & Hokfelt, T. ) Ch. IX 525–571 (Elsevier, 2005)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes
Whyte, W. A., Orlando, D. A., Hnisz, D., Abraham, B. J., Lin, C. Y., Kagey, M. H., Rahl, P. B., Lee, T. I., & Young, R. A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.035 · Cited by 4,143 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Sloan, S. A., Clarke, L. E., Caneda, C., Plaza, C. A., Blumenthal, P. D., Vogel, H., Steinberg, G. K., Edwards, M. S. B., Li, G., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013 · Cited by 2,295 · see citing works
Regev, A., Teichmann, S. A., Lander, E. S., Amit, I., Benoist, C., Birney, E., Bodenmiller, B., Campbell, P., Carninci, P., Clatworthy, M., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27041 · Cited by 2,232 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional organization of the hippocampal longitudinal axis
Strange, B. A., Witter, M. P., Lein, E. S., & Moser, E. I. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3785 · Cited by 1,738 · see citing works
Self-citationAdult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics
Tasic, B., Menon, V., Nguyen, T. N., Kim, T. K., Jarsky, T., Yao, Z., Levi, B., Gray, L. T., Sorensen, S. A., Dolbeare, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4216 · Cited by 1,714 · see citing works
Self-citationTranscriptome-scale spatial gene expression in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Maynard, K. R., Collado-Torres, L., Weber, L. M., Uytingco, C., Barry, B. K., Williams, S. R., Catallini, J. L., Tran, M. N., Besich, Z., Tippani, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00787-0 · Cited by 1,222 · see citing works
Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain
Miller, J. A., Ding, S.-L., Sunkin, S. M., Smith, K. A., Ng, L., Szafer, A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., Royall, J. J., Aiona, K., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13185 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Self-citationA meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure
Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain
Sjöstedt, E., Zhong, W., Fagerberg, L., Karlsson, M., Mitsios, N., Adori, C., Oksvold, P., Edfors, F., Limiszewska, A., Hikmet, F., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay5947 · Cited by 1,151 · see citing works
Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia
Fromer, M., Roussos, P., Sieberts, S. K., Johnson, J. S., Kavanagh, D. H., Perumal, T. M., Ruderfer, D. M., Oh, E. C., Topol, A., Shah, H. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4399 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain
Lake, B. B., Chen, S., Sos, B. C., Fan, J., Kaeser, G. E., Yung, Y. C., Duong, T. E., Gao, D., Chun, J., Kharchenko, P. V., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4038 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Allen Brain Atlas: an integrated spatio-temporal portal for exploring the central nervous system
Sunkin, S. M., Ng, L., Lau, C., Dolbeare, T., Gilbert, T. L., Thompson, C. L., Hawrylycz, M., & Dang, C. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1042 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Self-citationHyde, C. L., Nagle, M. W., Tian, C., Chen, X., Paciga, S. A., Wendland, J. R., Tung, J. Y., Hinds, D. A., Perlis, R. H., & Winslow, A. R. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3623 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Consciousness: here, there and everywhere?
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0167 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism
Tanay, A., & Regev, A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21350 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Genetic variability in the regulation of gene expression in ten regions of the human brain
UK Brain Expression Consortium, Ramasamy, A., North American Brain Expression Consortium, Trabzuni, D., Guelfi, S., Varghese, V., Smith, C., Walker, R., De, T., Coin, L., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3801 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks
Richiardi, J., Altmann, A., Milazzo, A.-C., Chang, C., Chakravarty, M. M., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bokde, A. L. W., Bromberg, U., Büchel, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255905 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Self-citationBurt, J. B., Demirtaş, M., Eckner, W. J., Navejar, N. M., Ji, J. L., Martin, W. J., Bernacchia, A., Anticevic, A., & Murray, J. D. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0195-0 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain
Hawrylycz, M., Miller, J. A., Menon, V., Feng, D., Dolbeare, T., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Jegga, A. G., Aronow, B. J., Lee, C.-K., Bernard, A., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4171 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Self-citationA genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of protein-coding genes in human blood cells
Uhlen, M., Karlsson, M. J., Zhong, W., Tebani, A., Pou, C., Mikes, J., Lakshmikanth, T., Forsström, B., Edfors, F., Odeberg, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax9198 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Hegele, R. A., Ginsberg, H. N., Chapman, M. J., Nordestgaard, B. G., Kuivenhoven, J. A., Averna, M., Borén, J., Bruckert, E., Catapano, A. L., Descamps, O. S., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70191-8 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Immune evasion mediated by PD-L1 on glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles
Ricklefs, F. L., Alayo, Q., Krenzlin, H., Mahmoud, A. B., Speranza, M. C., Nakashima, H., Hayes, J. L., Lee, K., Balaj, L., Passaro, C., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar2766 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Holtman, I. R., Raj, D. D., Miller, J. A., Schaafsma, W., Yin, Z., Brouwer, N., Wes, P. D., Möller, T., Orre, M., Kamphuis, W., et al. (2015) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-015-0203-5 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Self-citationAnterior hippocampus: the anatomy of perception, imagination and episodic memory
Zeidman, P., & Maguire, E. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.24 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Gulsuner, S., Walsh, T., Watts, A. C., Lee, M. K., Thornton, A. M., Casadei, S., Rippey, C., Shahin, H., Braff, D., Cadenhead, K. S., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.049 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Microglial activation and tau propagate jointly across Braak stages
Pascoal, T. A., Benedet, A. L., Ashton, N. J., Kang, M. S., Therriault, J., Chamoun, M., Savard, M., Lussier, F. Z., Tissot, C., Karikari, T. K., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01456-w · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Generative modeling of brain maps with spatial autocorrelation
Burt, J. B., Helmer, M., Shinn, M., Anticevic, A., & Murray, J. D. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117038 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Nagy, C., Maitra, M., Tanti, A., Suderman, M., Théroux, J.-F., Davoli, M. A., Perlman, K., Yerko, V., Wang, Y. C., Tripathy, S. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0621-y · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition)
Cossarizza, A., Chang, H., Radbruch, A., Abrignani, S., Addo, R., Akdis, M., Andrä, I., Andreata, F., Annunziato, F., Arranz, E., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.202170126 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Self-citationneuromaps: structural and functional interpretation of brain maps
Markello, R. D., Hansen, J. Y., Liu, Z.-Q., Bazinet, V., Shafiei, G., Suárez, L. E., Blostein, N., Seidlitz, J., Baillet, S., Satterthwaite, T. D., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01625-w · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond
Crosetto, N., Bienko, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3832 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Chia, R., Sabir, M. S., Bandres-Ciga, S., Saez-Atienzar, S., Reynolds, R. H., Gustavsson, E., Walton, R. L., Ahmed, S., Viollet, C., Ding, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00785-3 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Self-citationComprehensive cellular‐resolution atlas of the adult human brain
Ding, S., Royall, J. J., Sunkin, S. M., Ng, L., Facer, B. A. C., Lesnar, P., Guillozet‐Bongaarts, A., McMurray, B., Szafer, A., Dolbeare, T. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24080 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Self-citationSystems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders
Parikshak, N. N., Gandal, M. J., & Geschwind, D. H. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3934 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Self-citationEstrogen Effects on Cognitive and Synaptic Health Over the Lifecourse
Hara, Y., Waters, E. M., McEwen, B. S., & Morrison, J. H. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00036.2014 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Hochgerner, H., Zeisel, A., Lönnerberg, P., & Linnarsson, S. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0056-2 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Aerobic glycolysis in the human brain is associated with development and neotenous gene expression
Goyal, M. S., Hawrylycz, M., Miller, J. A., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (2014) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.020 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
“The AHBA data were corrected for batch C effects and normalized to the 75%quantile as previously described (Hawrylycz et al., 2012).”
InfluentialSelf-citationConvergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds
Pfenning, A. R., Hara, E., Whitney, O., Rivas, M. V., Wang, R., Roulhac, P. L., Howard, J. T., Wirthlin, M., Lovell, P. V., Ganapathy, G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256846 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
“1A)—of three to six adult male zebra finches (37), the most commonly studied vocal-learning songbird; (ii) 17 total paired samples from punch biopsy–dissected Area X and adjacent ventral striatum (VS) of male zebra finches hybridized to microarrays of our design (15); (iii) 12 total paired samples from laser-microdiss…”
InfluentialSelf-citationDevelopment and arealization of the cerebral cortex
Cadwell, C. R., Bhaduri, A., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Keefe, M. G., & Nowakowski, T. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.009 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
The promise of spatial transcriptomics for neuroscience in the era of molecular cell typing
Lein, E., Borm, L. E., & Linnarsson, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6827 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamic Development of Regional Cortical Thickness and Surface Area in Early Childhood
Lyall, A. E., Shi, F., Geng, X., Woolson, S., Li, G., Wang, L., Hamer, R. M., Shen, D., & Gilmore, J. H. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu027 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Preller, K. H., Burt, J. B., Ji, J. L., Schleifer, C. H., Adkinson, B. D., Stämpfli, P., Seifritz, E., Repovs, G., Krystal, J. H., Murray, J. D., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.35082 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Frontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study
Ferrari, R., Hernandez, D. G., Nalls, M. A., Rohrer, J. D., Ramasamy, A., Kwok, J. B. J., Dobson-Stone, C., Brooks, W. S., Schofield, P. R., Halliday, G. M., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70065-1 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire
Krienen, F. M., Goldman, M., Zhang, Q., C. H. del Rosario, R., Florio, M., Machold, R., Saunders, A., Levandowski, K., Zaniewski, H., Schuman, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2781-z · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Innovations in Primate Interneuron Repertoire
Krienen, F. M., Goldman, M., Zhang, Q., del Rosario, R., Florio, M., Machold, R., Saunders, A., Levandowski, K., Zaniewski, H., Schuman, B., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/709501 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Spatial Gene-Expression Gradients Underlie Prominent Heterogeneity of CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
Cembrowski, M. S., Bachman, J. L., Wang, L., Sugino, K., Shields, B. C., & Spruston, N. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.013 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
A High-Resolution<i>In Vivo</i>Atlas of the Human Brain's Serotonin System
Beliveau, V., Ganz, M., Feng, L., Ozenne, B., Højgaard, L., Fisher, P. M., Svarer, C., Greve, D. N., & Knudsen, G. M. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2830-16.2016 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Redin, C., Brand, H., Collins, R. L., Kammin, T., Mitchell, E., Hodge, J. C., Hanscom, C., Pillalamarri, V., Seabra, C. M., Abbott, M.-A., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3720 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease
Mathys, H., Boix, C. A., Akay, L. A., Xia, Z., Davila-Velderrain, J., Ng, A. P., Jiang, X., Abdelhady, G., Galani, K., Mantero, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07606-7 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Chagyrskaya Cave
Mafessoni, F., Grote, S., de Filippo, C., Slon, V., Kolobova, K. A., Viola, B., Markin, S. V., Chintalapati, M., Peyrégne, S., Skov, L., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2004944117 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
A Synergistic Core for Human Brain Evolution and Cognition
Luppi, A. I., Mediano, P. A. M., Rosas, F. E., Holland, N., Fryer, T. D., O’Brien, J. T., Rowe, J. B., Menon, D. K., Bor, D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01070-0 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural constructs for predicting neural toxicity
Schwartz, M. P., Hou, Z., Propson, N. E., Zhang, J., Engstrom, C. J., Costa, V. S., Jiang, P., Nguyen, B. K., Bolin, J. M., Daly, W., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1516645112 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Transcriptomic and morphophysiological evidence for a specialized human cortical GABAergic cell type
Boldog, E., Bakken, T. E., Hodge, R. D., Novotny, M., Aevermann, B. D., Baka, J., Bordé, S., Close, J. L., Diez-Fuertes, F., Ding, S.-L., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0205-2 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Self-citationMultivariate genome-wide analyses of the well-being spectrum
BIOS consortium, Baselmans, B. M. L., Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Jansen, R., Ip, H. F., van Dongen, J., Abdellaoui, A., van de Weijer, M. P., Bao, Y., Smart, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0320-8 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Leighton, S. P., Nerurkar, L., Krishnadas, R., Johnman, C., Graham, G. J., & Cavanagh, J. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.205 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Consciousness in humans and non-human animals: recent advances and future directions
Boly, M., Seth, A. K., Wilke, M., Ingmundson, P., Baars, B., Laureys, S., Edelman, D. B., & Tsuchiya, N. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00625 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease
Miller, J. A., Woltjer, R. L., Goodenbour, J. M., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2013) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm452 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationGaiteri, C., Ding, Y., French, B., Tseng, G. C., & Sibille, E. (2014) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12106 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Trampush, J. W., Yang, M. L. Z., Yu, J., Knowles, E., Davies, G., Liewald, D. C., Starr, J. M., Djurovic, S., Melle, I., Sundet, K., et al. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.244 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Neurotrophin signalling: novel insights into mechanisms and pathophysiology
Mitre, M., Mariga, A., & Chao, M. V. (2017) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20160044 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Normative brain size variation and brain shape diversity in humans
Reardon, P. K., Seidlitz, J., Vandekar, S., Liu, S., Patel, R., Park, M. T. M., Alexander-Bloch, A., Clasen, L. S., Blumenthal, J. D., Lalonde, F. M., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar2578 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Self-citationSynaptic scaffold evolution generated components of vertebrate cognitive complexity
Nithianantharajah, J., Komiyama, N. H., McKechanie, A., Johnstone, M., Blackwood, D. H., Clair, D. S., Emes, R. D., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Saksida, L. M., Bussey, T. J., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3276 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationTemporal Specification and Bilaterality of Human Neocortical Topographic Gene Expression
Pletikos, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Sedmak, G., Meyer, K. A., Zhu, Y., Cheng, F., Li, M., Kawasawa, Y. I., & Šestan, N. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.018 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Genetic topography of brain morphology
Chen, C.-H., Fiecas, M., Gutiérrez, E. D., Panizzon, M. S., Eyler, L. T., Vuoksimaa, E., Thompson, W. K., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., Jernigan, T. L., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308091110 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
The road to precision psychiatry: translating genetics into disease mechanisms
Gandal, M. J., Leppa, V., Won, H., Parikshak, N. N., & Geschwind, D. H. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4409 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationLoss of Nuclear TDP-43 Is Associated with Decondensation of LINE Retrotransposons
Liu, E. Y., Russ, J., Cali, C. P., Phan, J. M., Amlie-Wolf, A., & Lee, E. B. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.003 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“To determine whether this selective vulnerability was also reflected in the RNA-seq data, neuronal genes expressed in specific cortical layers were annotated (Bernard et al., 2012; Darmanis et al., 2015; Hawrylycz et al., 2012; Molyneaux et al., 2007; Zeisel et al., 2015) (Table S4).”
MethodA Quantitative Framework to Evaluate Modeling of Cortical Development by Neural Stem Cells
Stein, J. L., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Tian, Y., Parikshak, N. N., Hernández, I. A., Marchetto, M. C., Baker, D. K., Lu, D., Hinman, C. R., Lowe, J. K., et al. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.035 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationSekar, S., McDonald, J., Cuyugan, L., Aldrich, J., Kurdoglu, A., Adkins, J., Serrano, G., Beach, T. G., Craig, D. W., Valla, J., et al. (2015) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.027 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
A survey of methods for 3D histology reconstruction
Pichat, J., Iglesias, J. E., Yousry, T., Ourselin, S., & Modat, M. (2018) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.02.004 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Impacts of Neanderthal-Introgressed Sequences on the Landscape of Human Gene Expression
McCoy, R. C., Wakefield, J., & Akey, J. M. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.038 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Metabolomics of Human Brain Aging and Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases
Jové, M., Portero-Otín, M., Naudí, A., Ferrer, I., & Pamplona, R. (2014) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0000000000000091 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Krienen, F. M., Yeo, B. T. T., Ge, T., Buckner, R. L., & Sherwood, C. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510903113 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Selective Neuronal Vulnerability in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Network-Based Analysis
Roussarie, J.-P., Yao, V., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, P., Oughtred, R., Rust, J., Plautz, Z., Kasturia, S., Albornoz, C., Wang, W., Schmidt, E. F., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.010 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationLRP8-Reelin-regulated neuronal enhancer signature underlying learning and memory formation
Telese, F., Ma, Q., Perez, P. M., Notani, D., Oh, S., Li, W., Comoletti, D., Ohgi, K. A., Taylor, H., & Rosenfeld, M. G. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.033 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Transcriptional and spatial resolution of cell types in the mammalian habenula
Hashikawa, Y., Hashikawa, K., Rossi, M. A., Basiri, M. L., Liu, Y., Johnston, N. L., Ahmad, O. R., & Stuber, G. D. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.03.011 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Cellular correlates of cortical thinning throughout the lifespan
Vidal-Pineiro, D., Parker, N., Shin, J., French, L., Grydeland, H., Jackowski, A. P., Mowinckel, A. M., Patel, Y., Pausova, Z., Salum, G., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78471-3 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Radial glia require PDGFD-PDGFRβ signalling in human but not mouse neocortex
Lui, J. H., Nowakowski, T. J., Pollen, A. A., Javaherian, A., Kriegstein, A. R., & Oldham, M. C. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13973 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Ricciardi, E., Bonino, D., Pellegrini, S., & Pietrini, P. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.006 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Single-cell-resolution transcriptome map of human, chimpanzee, bonobo, and macaque brains
Khrameeva, E., Kurochkin, I., Han, D., Guijarro, P., Kanton, S., Santel, M., Qian, Z., Rong, S., Mazin, P., Sabirov, M., et al. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.256958.119 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks
Smith, S. J., Sümbül, U., Graybuck, L. T., Collman, F., Seshamani, S., Gala, R., Gliko, O., Elabbady, L., Miller, J. A., Bakken, T. E., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47889 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic Changes Shaping the Human Brain
Bae, B.-I., Jayaraman, D., & Walsh, C. A. (2015) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.035 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Gene expression links functional networks across cortex and striatum
Anderson, K. M., Krienen, F. M., Choi, E. Y., Reinen, J. M., Yeo, B. T. T., & Holmes, A. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03811-x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Integrated systems analysis reveals a molecular network underlying autism spectrum disorders
Li, J., Shi, M., Ma, Z., Zhao, S., Euskirchen, G., Ziskin, J., Urban, A., Hallmayer, J., & Snyder, M. (2014) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20145487 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“For example, when we considered a threshold of Pearson’s correlation of 0.7 for genes expressed across brain anatomical sections (Hawrylycz et al , 2012), more than 2.8 million gene pairs displayed significant co-expression, whereas the complete physical interac-tome in human is estimated to…”
InfluentialInhibition of Fatty Acid Binding Proteins Elevates Brain Anandamide Levels and Produces Analgesia
Kaczocha, M., Rebecchi, M. J., Ralph, B. P., Teng, Y.-H. G., Berger, W. T., Galbavy, W., Elmes, M. W., Glaser, S. T., Wang, L., Rizzo, R. C., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094200 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Neuropathological and transcriptomic characteristics of the aged brain
Miller, J. A., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A., Gibbons, L. E., Postupna, N., Renz, A., Beller, A. E., Sunkin, S. M., Ng, L., Rose, S. E., Smith, K. A., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.31126 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationAdamo, A., Atashpaz, S., Germain, P.-L., Zanella, M., D'Agostino, G., Albertin, V., Chenoweth, J., Micale, L., Fusco, C., Unger, C., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3169 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Toward a Genetic Dissection of Cortical Circuits in the Mouse
Huang, Z. J. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.041 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Harrison, N. A., Doeller, C. F., Voon, V., Burgess, N., & Critchley, H. D. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.005 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Hartmann, J., Bajaj, T., Klengel, C., Chatzinakos, C., Ebert, T., Dedic, N., McCullough, K. M., Lardenoije, R., Joëls, M., Meijer, O. C., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109185 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Rizzo, G., Veronese, M., Tonietto, M., Zanotti-Fregonara, P., Turkheimer, F. E., & Bertoldo, A. (2014) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.55 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Gómez de San José, N., Massa, F., Halbgebauer, S., Oeckl, P., Steinacker, P., & Otto, M. (2022) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-021-02411-2 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The BIN1 rs744373 SNP is associated with increased tau-PET levels and impaired memory
Franzmeier, N., Rubinski, A., Neitzel, J., Ewers, M., (ADNI), T. A. D. N. I., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P., Petersen, R., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09564-5 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationSaunders, A., Huang, K. W., & Sabatini, B. L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149798 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Krishnan, M. L., Van Steenwinckel, J., Schang, A.-L., Yan, J., Arnadottir, J., Le Charpentier, T., Csaba, Z., Dournaud, P., Cipriani, S., Auvynet, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00422-w · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Sensory neuropathy with bone destruction due to a mutation in the membrane-shaping atlastin GTPase 3
Kornak, U., Mademan, I., Schinke, M., Voigt, M., Krawitz, P., Hecht, J., Barvencik, F., Schinke, T., Gießelmann, S., Beil, F. T., et al. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt357 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Transcriptome organization for chronic alcohol abuse in human brain
Farris, S. P., Arasappan, D., Hunicke-Smith, S., Harris, R. A., & Mayfield, R. D. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.159 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Diez, I., Larson, A. G., Nakhate, V., Dunn, E. C., Fricchione, G. L., Nicholson, T. R., Sepulcre, J., & Perez, D. L. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0665-0 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Imaging transcriptomics of brain disorders
Arnatkeviciute, A., Fulcher, B. D., Bellgrove, M. A., & Fornito, A. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.10.002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Brown, D. M., Hixon, A. M., Oldfield, L. M., Zhang, Y., Novotny, M., Wang, W., Das, S. R., Shabman, R. S., Tyler, K. L., & Scheuermann, R. H. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01954-18 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hawrylycz, M. J., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, J. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., Abajian, C., Beckmann, C. F., Bernard, A., Bertagnolli, D., Boe, A. F., Cartagena, P. M., Chakravarty, M. M., Chapin, M., Chong, J., Dalley, R. A., Daly, B. D., Dang, C., Datta, S., Dee, N., Dolbeare, T. A., Faber, V., Feng, D., Fowler, D. R., Goldy, J., Gregor, B. W., Haradon, Z., Haynor, D. R., Hohmann, J. G., Horvath, S., Howard, R. E., Jeromin, A., Jochim, J. M., Kinnunen, M., Lau, C., Lazarz, E. T., Lee, C., Lemon, T. A., Li, L., Li, Y., Morris, J. A., Overly, C. C., Parker, P. D., Parry, S. E., Reding, M., Royall, J. J., Schulkin, J., Sequeira, P. A., Slaughterbeck, C. R., Smith, S. C., Sodt, A. J., Sunkin, S. M., Swanson, B. E., Vawter, M. P., Williams, D., Wohnoutka, P., Zielke, H. R., Geschwind, D. H., Hof, P. R., Smith, S. M., Koch, C., Grant, S. G. N., & Jones, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Maryland Medical Center (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Banyan Biomarkers (United States) (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hawrylycz, Michael J.
- ORCID
- Hawrylycz, Michael J.
- Lein, Ed S.
- Guillozet-Bongaarts, Angela L.
- Ng, Lydia
- Miller, Jeremy A.
- Smith, Kimberly A.
- Beckmann, Christian F.
- Bernard, Amy
- Bertagnolli, Darren
- Chakravarty, M. Mallar
- Chapin, Mike
- Chong, Jimmy
- Dalley, Rachel A.
- Dee, Nick
- Dolbeare, Tim A.
- Feng, David
- Fowler, David R.
- Goldy, Jeff
- Gregor, Benjamin W.
- Haynor, David R.
- Hohmann, John G.
- Horvath, Steve
- Lee, Changkyu
- Li, Ling
- Li, Yang
- Parker, Patrick D.
- Reding, Melissa
- Schulkin, Jay
- Sunkin, Susan M.
- Vawter, Marquis P.
- Wohnoutka, Paul
- Geschwind, Daniel H.
- Hof, Patrick R.
- Smith, Stephen M.
- Grant, Seth G. N.
- Jones, Allan R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 489
- Issue
- 7416
- Pages
- 391-399
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC4243026
- OpenAlex
- W2055655674
- Semantic Scholar
- 44c6c5a71047351f81db358eabf87882c5232718
- Cited by
- 3,083
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 341 · 2025: 365 · 2024: 320 · 2023: 259 · 2022: 267 · 2021: 274 · 2020: 243 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 165 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 134 · 2014: 123 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 43.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Wellcome Trust (066717, 077155)
- European Commission (241498, 242167, 241995)
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- U.S. Public Health Service (1C76HF15069-01-00, 1C76HF19619-01-00)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085801, R37MH060233)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- human brain transcriptome, transcriptional atlas, gene expression mapping, differential gene expression, gene co-expression, neuronal cell types, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, primary sensorimotor cortex, frontal lobe, calbindin-D28k, hippocampus, postmortem brain, brain cell types
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anatomy, Artistic, Animals, Atlases as Topic, Brain, Dopamine, Health, Hippocampus, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, RNA, Messenger, Species Specificity, In Situ Hybridization, Neocortex, Internet, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Mice, Post-Synaptic Density, Transcriptome, Calbindins, S100 Calcium Binding Protein G
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review