Cited by 60Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Human Embryonic Stem Cells: An In Vitro Model to Study Mechanisms Controlling Pluripotency in Early Mammalian Development

Vallier, Ludovic, Pedersen, Roger A.·2005·Stem Cell Reviews

Abstract

The property of pluripotency confers the capacity for differentiation into a large number of cell types including extra-embryonic, somatic and germinal cells. During normal development, pluripotency is acquired by the cells of the early embryo, which shortly thereafter undergo differentiation, whereas embryonic stem cells (ESCs) uniquely maintain pluripotency while undergoing extensive in vitro proliferation. Studies using ESCs have begun to unravel the network of cytokines and transcription factors responsible for their maintenance of pluripotency. Surprisingly, mouse and human ESCs display significant differences in such mechanisms despite their similar embryonic origins. In this review, we compare the properties of pluripotent embryonic cells with those of ESCs to establish a general model for the mechanisms maintaining pluripotency. We first consider whether mouse and human ESCs represent comparable stages of early embryonic development. We then describe how human embryoid body (EB) differentiation could be used as a model of embryonic development. Finally, to concretely illustrate the discussion, we discuss our recent results concerning Nodal function in controlling cell fate at early stages of human EB development. With the new perspective of these findings, we suggest a previously unrecognized role of TGF-beta pathway signaling in maintaining pluripotency at early stages of mammalian embryonic development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/scr:1:2:119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vallier, L., & Pedersen, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Vallier, Ludovic
Venue
Stem Cell Reviews
Published
2005
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
119-130
ISSN
1550-8943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1927640672
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stem Cell Reviews and Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
human embryonic stem cells, pluripotency, early mammalian development, embryoid body differentiation, Nodal signaling, TGF-beta signaling, cell fate specification, transcription factors, cytokines
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review