Rethinking food well-being as reconciliation between pleasure and sustainability
Open accessAbstract
Food well-being has been addressed in consumer research over the past decade as a means to provide a more holistic perspective on consumers’ relationship to food. However, the interest has mainly been directed at individual choice and experience, meaning that the ethical foundations of well-being have received less attention. This foundation is important in the context of food as it provides an opportunity for outlining a new agenda for food well-being. Using food design as an overall framework, this article introduces Epicurean ethics as an underlying conceptual design that positions pleasure at the core of food well-being. Not in the sense of trivial hedonism, but as judicious consideration of what is pleasurable when individual and collective interest is weighed and short- and long-term consequences taken into account.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Negative memories of childhood meals dominated by unpleasant processed foods led to the construction of sustainable food identities linked to pleasure, organic and authentic provisioning.
“Redolent of the oppositional potential of legacy Kharuhayothin and Kerrane (2018) found within their study, negative memories of childhood meals dominated by unpleasant processed foods led to the construction of sustainable food identities linked to pleasure, organic and authentic provisioning (Hedegaard and Hémar-Nicolas, 2020).”
From 'I'd never cook it now': an exploration of intergenerational transference and its role in facilitating family food sustainability (2023) · cites this paper as Hedegaard and Hémar-Nicolas, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carrigan, M., Wells, V., & Athwal, N. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2021-0804 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hedegaard, L., & Hémar-Nicolas, V.
- Affiliations
- University College Lillebaelt (DK)
- ISNI: 0000000449106535 Paris-Saclay University
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Design
- Publisher
- Intellect
- Published
- 2020-12-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-166
- ISSN
- 2056-6522 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-6530
- OpenAlex
- W3119243218
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Design (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Culinary Culture and Tourism
- Keywords
- food well-being, Epicurean ethics, pleasure, sustainability, food design, consumer ethics, hedonism, collective interests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review