Cited by 13Underwater Acoustics ResearchMusic and Audio ProcessingWireless Signal Modulation Classification

Vessel Classification through Convolutional Neural Networks using Passive Sonar Spectrogram Images

Open access
Cinelli, Lucas, Chaves, Gabriel, Lima, Markus·2018·Anais de XXXVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicações e Processamento de Sinais

Abstract

Vessel classification is an extremely important task for coastal areas security and surveillance.Currently, this task relies on Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images but gathering these images is expensive and often prohibitive.In this paper, we propose using spectrograms containing characteristic sound noise records of each vessel acquired from a single passive sonar device as an input to a convolutional neural network, which performs the classification.The main advantage of our method is its simplicity and low cost development due to the nature of this kind of data.Furthermore, our proposal can be used alongside other SAR-image-based method, potentially improving results of the overall classifier.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14209/sbrt.2018.340

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When using spectrograms of hydrophone data, a basic four-convolutional-layer CNN has been shown to outperform a fully connected NN with either 0 or 512-neuron hidden layers.

    “When using spectrograms of hydrophone data, a basic four-convolutional-layer CNN has been shown to outperform a fully connected NN with either 0 or 512-neuron hidden layers [119].”

    From A Survey of Underwater Acoustic Data Classification Methods Using Deep Learning for Shoreline Surveillance (2022) · cites this paper as [119]

    The Results report that VesselNet achieved 83.9% average precision, exceeding the no-hidden-layer MLP’s 79.5% and the 512-neuron-hidden-layer MLP’s 79.7%. But the Experimental Procedure lists two convolutional layers in VesselNet, not four; its best-performing configuration also used both spectrogram and delta-frequency inputs. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Improved results were observed when both spectrograms and delta frequency images were used as inputs over the use of spectrograms alone or in combination with delta-delta frequency images.

    “Furthermore, improved results were observed when both spectrograms and delta frequency images (i.e., the first difference of signal features, an approximation of the first derivative) were used as inputs over the use of spectrograms alone or in combination with delta–delta frequency images (i.e., the second difference of signal features).”
  • Due to possible overfitting resulting from small dataset size, high interclass similarity, and a large number of model parameters, the finding about delta frequency images may have limitations.

    “However, due to possible overfitting of the system resulting from small dataset size, high interclass similarity and a large number of model parameters, this finding may have limitations.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. R. G. V. Meyer, W. Kleynhans, and C. P. Schwegmann, "Small Ships don't Shine: Classification of Ocean Vessels from Low Resolution, Large Swath Area SAR Acquisitions," in 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), vol. 2016-Novem. Beijing, China: IEEE, 2016, pp. 975-978.
  2. I. Macedo Quintanilha, "End-to-end Speech Recognition Applied to Brazilian Portuguese Using Deep Learning," Ph.D. dissertation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 2017.
  3. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, 1st ed. Cambridge, United States: MIT Press, 2016.
  4. J. B. d. O. S. Filho, "Classificação Neural de Sinais de Sonar Passivo," Ph.D. dissertation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cinelli, L., Chaves, G., & Lima, M.
Venue
Anais de XXXVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicações e Processamento de Sinais
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W2975338200
Cited by
13
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.17
Type
conference paper
Language
pt
Open access
Locations
Anais de XXXV Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicações e Processamento de Sinais (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Underwater Acoustics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
Keywords
vessel classification, passive sonar, spectrogram images, convolutional neural networks, coastal monitoring, maritime security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review