Cited by 89Dental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal Treatmentsdental development and anomalies

The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique

Open access
Ludwig, Kevin H., Fontana, Margherita, Vinson, LaQuia A., Platt, Jeffrey A., Dean, Jeffrey A.·2014·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Background In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) used to restore primary molars with caries lesions, placed by means of both the traditional technique (involving complete caries removal and tooth reduction before placement of the SSC) and the Hall technique (involving no caries removal, no crown preparation and no use of local anesthetic before placement of the SSC). Methods The authors conducted a retrospective chart review by using the patient records at a private pediatric dental practice at which the Hall technique had been introduced in June 2010 as an alternative treatment to traditional SSC placement. The inclusion criteria were caries lesions on a primary molar with no clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpitis, necrosis or abscess, as well as follow-up of at least six months or until failure, whichever came first. They graded restoration success by using a four-point scale based on presence or loss of the SSC, and whether or not the patient needed further treatment associated with pulpal pathology or secondary caries. They collected and summarized patient demographic information. They used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve along with 95 percent confidence intervals to evaluate clinical success. Results The authors found that 65 (97 percent) of 67 SSCs placed with the Hall technique (mean observation time, 15 months; range, four-37 months) and 110 (94 percent) of 117 SSCs placed with the traditional technique (mean observation time, 53 months; range, four-119 months) were successful. Conclusion Findings of this study show a similar success rate for SSCs placed with the traditional technique or the Hall technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14219/jada.2014.89

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ludwig, K. H., Fontana, M., Vinson, L. A., Platt, J. A., & Dean, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Dean, Jeffrey A.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
145
Issue
12
Pages
1248-1253
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043868914
Cited by
89
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
stainless steel crowns, Hall technique, primary molars, dental caries, pediatric dentistry, restoration success, crown survival, secondary caries
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Crowns, Dental Caries, Dental Restoration, Permanent, DMF Index, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Male, Molar, Retrospective Studies, Stainless Steel, Treatment Outcome, Dental Care for Children, Dental Restoration Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review