The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique
Open accessAbstract
Background In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) used to restore primary molars with caries lesions, placed by means of both the traditional technique (involving complete caries removal and tooth reduction before placement of the SSC) and the Hall technique (involving no caries removal, no crown preparation and no use of local anesthetic before placement of the SSC). Methods The authors conducted a retrospective chart review by using the patient records at a private pediatric dental practice at which the Hall technique had been introduced in June 2010 as an alternative treatment to traditional SSC placement. The inclusion criteria were caries lesions on a primary molar with no clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpitis, necrosis or abscess, as well as follow-up of at least six months or until failure, whichever came first. They graded restoration success by using a four-point scale based on presence or loss of the SSC, and whether or not the patient needed further treatment associated with pulpal pathology or secondary caries. They collected and summarized patient demographic information. They used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve along with 95 percent confidence intervals to evaluate clinical success. Results The authors found that 65 (97 percent) of 67 SSCs placed with the Hall technique (mean observation time, 15 months; range, four-37 months) and 110 (94 percent) of 117 SSCs placed with the traditional technique (mean observation time, 53 months; range, four-119 months) were successful. Conclusion Findings of this study show a similar success rate for SSCs placed with the traditional technique or the Hall technique.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Hall technique reduces dental fear and anxiety while providing long-term protection against caries with minimal maintenance.
“It reduces dental fear and anxiety while providing long-term protection against caries with minimal maintenance [49,51].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Hall technique's performance significantly exceeds that of teeth treated with pulpotomy and composite restorations, especially in terms of durability and caries prevention.
“This performance significantly exceeds that of teeth treated with pulpotomy and composite restorations, especially in terms of durability and caries prevention [49].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Hall technique is particularly beneficial for children who suffer from dental anxiety or exhibit behavioral difficulties.
“It is particularly beneficial for children who suffer from dental anxiety or exhibit behavioral difficulties [48,49].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Hall technique eliminates drilling, anesthesia, and multiple follow-up appointments.
“This technique offers multiple advantages, including the elimination of drilling, anesthesia, and multiple follow-up appointments.”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Hall technique has a 97% survival rate over five years.
“Numerous studies have demonstrated remarkable clinical success rates, with a 97% survival rate over five years.”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Hall technique effectively prevents the progression of dental lesions while avoiding the need for mechanical excavation.
“This technique effectively prevents the progression of dental lesions while avoiding the need for mechanical excavation.”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Sealing Caries in Primary Molars: Randomized Control Trial, 5-year Results
Innes, N. P. T., Evans, D. J. P., & Stirrups, D. R. (2011) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034511422064 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Innes, N. P. T., Stirrups, D. R., Evans, D. J. P., Hall, N., & Leggate, M. (2006) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth
Innes, N. P., Ricketts, D., Chong, L. Y., Keightley, A. J., Lamont, T., & Santamaria, R. M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005512.pub3 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Hall Technique for Carious Primary Molars: A Review of the Literature
Altoukhi, D. H., & El-Housseiny, A. A. (2020) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj8010011 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Maguire, A., Clarkson, J. E., Douglas, G. V., Ryan, V., Homer, T., Marshman, Z., McColl, E., Wilson, N., Vale, L., Robertson, M., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24010 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Elamin, F., Abdelazeem, N., Salah, I., Mirghani, Y., & Wong, F. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217740 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Children's oral health assessment, prevention, and treatment
Okunseri, C., Gonzalez, C., & Hodgson, B. (2015) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2015.05.010 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
AL-Kaff, A. A., Alshehri, A. Z., Alasmari, R. A., Alsubaie, N., Aldaws, A., Althaqeel, A., Alshehri, R. S., & Alawaji, Y. M. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.87450 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ludwig, K. H., Fontana, M., Vinson, L. A., Platt, J. A., & Dean, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Indiana University Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dean, Jeffrey A.
- Venue
- The Journal of the American Dental Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1248-1253
- ISSN
- 0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043868914
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
- Keywords
- stainless steel crowns, Hall technique, primary molars, dental caries, pediatric dentistry, restoration success, crown survival, secondary caries
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Preschool, Crowns, Dental Caries, Dental Restoration, Permanent, DMF Index, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Male, Molar, Retrospective Studies, Stainless Steel, Treatment Outcome, Dental Care for Children, Dental Restoration Failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review