Cited by 57dental development and anomaliesDental Health and Care UtilizationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

A costs analysis of dental treatment for ectodermal dysplasia

MURDOCK, SEAN, LEE, JESSICA Y., GUCKES, ALBERT, WRIGHT, J. TIMOTHY·2005·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Overview Dental treatment modalities for ectodermal dysplasia (ED) vary markedly depending on the clinical manifestations, but to date there have been no studies exploring the potential economic impact of ED. On the basis of anecdotal and clinical reports, the authors postulate that costs of dental treatment for this condition can have a substantial financial impact on patients and their families. Objective The purpose of the authors' pilot study was to develop an economic model for various treatment modalities for ED with severe hypodontia. Methods The authors first used a comprehensive review of the literature and expert consensus to establish a treatment modalities model for ED. Next, they completed chart reviews to validate the model with sample treatment and costs information. Using these data, they then constructed a model of treatment options and associated costs. Results The sample included 24 patients with ED who had severe hypodontia. Forty-two percent were female; patients' ages ranged from 4 years, 11 months to 31 years, 1 month. Forty-two percent had dental insurance coverage, while more than one-half paid for services out of pocket. An estimated 84 percent had undergone prosthodontic treatment, 37 percent orthodontic treatment and 19 percent implant surgery. Depending on the age of the patient and types of dental treatment, there was a broad variation in costs. This ranged from $2,038 to $3,298 for those who had received prosthodontic treatment only; it ranged f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0343

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The economic aspects of the dental management of GDDs and the expected costs for those affected have been addressed in only a few studies.

    “Moreover, the economic aspects of the dental management of GDDs and the expected costs for those affected have been addressed in only a few studies (Murdock et al. 2005; Incici et al. 2009; Pousette Lundgren et al. 2021).”

    From Dental Management of Genetic Dental Disorders: A Critical Review (2025) · cites this paper as Murdock et al. 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MURDOCK, S., LEE, J. Y., GUCKES, A., & WRIGHT, J. T.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
LEE, JESSICA Y.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
136
Issue
9
Pages
1273-1276
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017706567
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (1 K22 DE 14743-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
ectodermal dysplasia, dental care costs, tooth agenesis, prosthodontic treatment, orthodontic treatment, dental implants, economic burden, dental insurance coverage, out-of-pocket costs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anodontia, Child, Child, Preschool, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Costs and Cost Analysis, Dental Care, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Female, Financing, Personal, Humans, Insurance, Dental, Male, Orthodontics, Corrective, Patient Care Planning, Pilot Projects, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Models, Economic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review