Cited by 75Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomesdental development and anomaliesDental Trauma and Treatments

Dental implants in patients with ectodermal dysplasia and tooth agenesis: A critical review of the literature

Alan K W Yap, Iven J Klineberg·2010·The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this article are to critique the available literature on dental implants in patients with ectodermal dysplasia (ED) syndrome and tooth agenesis, review the outcomes of implant therapy in these patients, and provide recommendations on the timing of implant placement for these patients. Materials and methods Searches were performed using Medline, Embase, All EBM Reviews, and Pre-Medline for articles relating to implant patients suffering from ED. Articles unrelated to the topic of dental implants in patients with ED and tooth agenesis, without abstracts, or in languages other than English were excluded. Selected articles were graded according to levels of evidence based upon guidelines set forth by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Articles found to have a level of evidence of IV were excluded from this study. Results The literature on dental implants in patients with ED and tooth agenesis was found to be scarce. No randomized controlled or case-controlled studies were found. Only 12 articles were found to satisfy all inclusion criteria. Conclusion Implant survival rates vary between 88.5% and 97.6% in patients with ED and between 90% and 100% in patients with tooth agenesis. Implants placed in adolescent ED patients do not have a significant effect on craniofacial growth, while implants placed in ED patients younger than 18 years have a higher risk of failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3913(10)60099-6

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yap, A. K. W., & Klineberg, I. J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
97
ISSN
0022-3913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1566262796
Cited by
75
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
Keywords
dental implants, ectodermal dysplasia, tooth agenesis, implant survival, implant failure, implant placement timing, craniofacial growth, adolescents, implant outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Anodontia, Child, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Humans, Dental Implants, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Dentistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review