Positive association between conflicts of interest and reporting of positive results in randomized clinical trials in dentistry
Open accessAbstract
Background The relationship between industry funding and study results has been explored widely in medicine but not in dentistry. The authors aimed to assess the relationship between conflicts of interest (COIs) and study results.Methods The authors assessed all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between July 2010 and June 2012 in the 10 dental journals with the highest impact factors in dentistry. The authors used three definitions of COI and explored their associations with positive study results.Results Depending on the definition of COI, the odds ratio for reporting positive results varied between 2.40 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.16-5.13) and 9.19 (95 percent CI, 1.71-170.64). The authors found no association between positive study results and journal of publication or area of practice.Conclusions RCTs in which authors have some type of COI are more likely to have results that support the intervention being assessed.Practical implications When reviewing the results of RCTs, clinicians need to be aware of the association between reporting positive study results and the type of COI disclosure and be even more careful when critically appraising and applying their results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These factors can affect RCTs from conception to the reporting of results and conclusions.
“These factors can affect RCTs from conception to the reporting of results and conclusions [13, 32, 33].”
From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Brignardello-Petersen, R., Carrasco-Labra, A., Yanine, N., Ulloa, C., Araya, I., Pintor, F., Villanueva, J., & Cornejo-Ovalle, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of the American Dental Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1165-1170
- ISSN
- 0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046271775
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- conflicts of interest, industry funding, reporting bias, randomized controlled trials, dental research, conflict of interest disclosure, critical appraisal, research integrity
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Personnel, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Conflict of Interest, Treatment Outcome, Dental Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review