CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Library Science and Information LiteracyDigital literacy in educationEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Strategic Approach to Curriculum Design for Information Literacy in Teacher Education – Implementing an Information Literacy Conceptual Framework

Open access
Klebansky, Anna, Fraser, Sharon·2013·Australian Journal of Teacher Education
DOI 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.5
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper details a conceptual framework that situates curriculum design for information literacy and lifelong learning, through a cohesive developmental information literacy based model for learning, at the core of teacher education courses at UTAS. The implementation of the framework facilitates curriculum design that systematically, consistently and incrementally develops information literacy capabilities across entire teacher education course structures, thereby facilitating teacher education students to graduate as critical thinkers, problem solvers, informed decision makers and independent, self-directed lifelong learners. As education professionals, these graduates have the potential of developing these capabilities in the children they teach. The paper discusses the development of a conceptual framework and identifies areas for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.5

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Biggs, J.B. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  2. Bruce, C. (2004). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: a background paper". White paper prepared for UNESCO, the US NCLIS and National Forum for Information Literacy. Paper presented at the 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference ÒLifelong Learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?Ó, Yeppoon, Queensland.
  3. Bruce, C., & Candy, P. (1995). Developing informationn literate graduates: prompts for good practice. In D. Booker (Ed.), Information Literacy in Practice. Sydney: AUSLIB Press.
  4. Bundy, A. (1999). Information literacy: the 21st century educational smartcard. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 30(4), 233-250.
  5. Bundy, A. (2000). Information literacy: the foundation of lifelong learning. Paper presented at the Lifelong learning annual conference of the South Australian Association of School Parents Clubs. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.125.7441&rep=rep1&type= pdf
  6. Bundy, A. (2004b). Zeitgeist: information literacy and educational change. Paper presented at the 4th Frankfurt Scientific Symposium, Germany. http://www.library.unisa.edu.au/learn/infolit/infolitpapers.aspx
  7. Bundy, A. (Ed.). (2004c). Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: principles, standards and practice (2nd ed.). Adelaide: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL).
  8. Kuhlthau, C. (1995). The instructional role of the library media specialist in the information- age school. In Library Instruction Round Table Fifteenth Anniversary Task Force (Ed.), Information for a new age: Redefining the librarian. Englewood, Colorado: American Library Association.
  9. Peacock, J. (2002). The QUT information literacy framework & syllabus: walking the talk. Paper presented at the Lifelong Learning Conference Online, Yeppoon, Queensland. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/714/
  10. Radar, H. (2002). Teaching and assessing information literacy skills in the 21st century: a global perspective. Library Trends, 51(2), 141-261.
  11. Radomski, N. (1999). Implementing information literacy: themes, issues & future directions. Final project report & case studies (Support Centre for Effective Learning & Teaching & Information Services Branch, Trans.), Ballarat: University of Ballarat. PMCid:PMC25758
  12. Ralph, D. (1999). Information literacy and foundations for lifelong learning. Paper presented at the Fourth National Information Literacy Conference, Adelaide.
  13. Shaw, A. (2009). Education in the 21st century. Ethos, 17(1), 11-17.
  14. Todd, R. (1995). Integrated information skills instruction: does it make a diffference? SLMQ, 23(2), 14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klebansky, A., & Fraser, S.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
ORCID
Fraser, Sharon
Venue
Australian Journal of Teacher Education
Publisher
Edith Cowan University
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
38
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0313-5373 (ISSN-L)
  • 1835-517X
DOI
10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.5
OpenAlex
W1988261376
Cited by
18
References
64
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Australian journal of teacher education (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
information literacy, curriculum development, teacher professional development, conceptual framework, lifelong learning, critical thinking, self-directed learning, course structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review