The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Strategic Approach to Curriculum Design for Information Literacy in Teacher Education – Implementing an Information Literacy Conceptual Framework
Open accessAbstract
This paper details a conceptual framework that situates curriculum design for information literacy and lifelong learning, through a cohesive developmental information literacy based model for learning, at the core of teacher education courses at UTAS. The implementation of the framework facilitates curriculum design that systematically, consistently and incrementally develops information literacy capabilities across entire teacher education course structures, thereby facilitating teacher education students to graduate as critical thinkers, problem solvers, informed decision makers and independent, self-directed lifelong learners. As education professionals, these graduates have the potential of developing these capabilities in the children they teach. The paper discusses the development of a conceptual framework and identifies areas for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Embedding generic IL skills within discipline-based learning tasks. These combine mechanical (techni- cal) and cognitive/metacognitive skills needed to critically engage with information in knowledge building.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Klebansky and Fraser (2013)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians.
Barr, A. C., Gillard, J., Firth, V., Scrymgour, M., Welford, R., Lomax-Smith, J. D., Bartlett, D., Pike, B., & Constable, E. (2008) · Cited by 1,158
(1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 882
21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future
Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011) · Kappa Delta Pi Record · doi:10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575 · Cited by 595
A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes
Barrie, S. C. (2007) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070701476100 · Cited by 466
Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers
Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360701658609 · Cited by 397
A discipline-based approach to information literacy
Grafstein, A. J. (2002) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(02)00283-5 · Cited by 321
The Australian Qualifications Framework
McInnis, C. (2009) · Higher education dynamics · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_8 · Cited by 312
(2009) · Educational leadership · Cited by 298
Assessing 21st Century Skills: Summary of a Workshop
Koenig, J. A. (2011) · ATE Central (National Science Foundation) · Cited by 279
Rethinking Information Literacy
Marcum, J. W. (2002) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/603335 · Cited by 208
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Biggs, J.B. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Bruce, C. (2004). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: a background paper". White paper prepared for UNESCO, the US NCLIS and National Forum for Information Literacy. Paper presented at the 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference ÒLifelong Learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?Ó, Yeppoon, Queensland.
- Bruce, C., & Candy, P. (1995). Developing informationn literate graduates: prompts for good practice. In D. Booker (Ed.), Information Literacy in Practice. Sydney: AUSLIB Press.
- Bundy, A. (1999). Information literacy: the 21st century educational smartcard. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 30(4), 233-250.
- Bundy, A. (2000). Information literacy: the foundation of lifelong learning. Paper presented at the Lifelong learning annual conference of the South Australian Association of School Parents Clubs. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.125.7441&rep=rep1&type= pdf
- Bundy, A. (2004b). Zeitgeist: information literacy and educational change. Paper presented at the 4th Frankfurt Scientific Symposium, Germany. http://www.library.unisa.edu.au/learn/infolit/infolitpapers.aspx
- Bundy, A. (Ed.). (2004c). Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: principles, standards and practice (2nd ed.). Adelaide: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL).
- Kuhlthau, C. (1995). The instructional role of the library media specialist in the information- age school. In Library Instruction Round Table Fifteenth Anniversary Task Force (Ed.), Information for a new age: Redefining the librarian. Englewood, Colorado: American Library Association.
- Peacock, J. (2002). The QUT information literacy framework & syllabus: walking the talk. Paper presented at the Lifelong Learning Conference Online, Yeppoon, Queensland. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/714/
- Radar, H. (2002). Teaching and assessing information literacy skills in the 21st century: a global perspective. Library Trends, 51(2), 141-261.
- Radomski, N. (1999). Implementing information literacy: themes, issues & future directions. Final project report & case studies (Support Centre for Effective Learning & Teaching & Information Services Branch, Trans.), Ballarat: University of Ballarat. PMCid:PMC25758
- Ralph, D. (1999). Information literacy and foundations for lifelong learning. Paper presented at the Fourth National Information Literacy Conference, Adelaide.
- Shaw, A. (2009). Education in the 21st century. Ethos, 17(1), 11-17.
- Todd, R. (1995). Integrated information skills instruction: does it make a diffference? SLMQ, 23(2), 14.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework
Falloon, G. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 · Cited by 1,372
Horváth, L., Pintér, T. M., Misley, H., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12914-6 · Cited by 46
Teachers and information literacy:
Shannon, C., Reilly, J., & Bates, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Information Literacy · doi:10.11645/13.2.2642 · Cited by 31
Taylor, C., & DiGiacomo, D. K. (2023) · Journal of Information Literacy · doi:10.11645/17.1.3258 · Cited by 15
Theoretical Foundations of Project Based Curricula in Higher Education
Korkmaz, G., & Kalaycı, N. (2019) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.14812/cuefd.479322 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Klebansky, A., & Fraser, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- ORCID
- Fraser, Sharon
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Edith Cowan University
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0313-5373 (ISSN-L)
- 1835-517X
- OpenAlex
- W1988261376
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Australian journal of teacher education (publishedVersion)
- UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- information literacy, curriculum development, teacher professional development, conceptual framework, lifelong learning, critical thinking, self-directed learning, course structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review