The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Hybrid Malicious Code Detection Method based on Deep Learning
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a hybrid malicious code detection scheme based on AutoEncoder and DBN (Deep Belief Networks).Firstly, we use the AutoEncoder deep learning method to reduce the dimensionality of data.This could convert complicated high-dimensional data into low dimensional codes with the nonlinear mapping, thereby reducing the dimensionality of data, extracting the main features of the data; then using DBN learning method to detect malicious code.DBN is composed of multilayer Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM, Restricted Boltzmann Machine) and a layer of BP neural network.Based on unsupervised training of every layer of RBM, we make the output vector of the last layer of RBM as the input vectors of BP neural network, then conduct supervised training to the BP neural network, finally achieve the optimal hybrid model by fine-tuning the entire network.After inputting testing samples into the hybrid model, the experimental results show that the detection accuracy getting by the hybrid detection method proposed in this paper is higher than that of single DBN.The proposed method reduces the time complexity and has better detection performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10040122 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Ma, R., & Jiao, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Security and Its Applications
- Publisher
- NADIA
- Published
- 2015-05-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 205-216
- ISSN
- 1738-9976 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2554148185
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Hybrid Malicious Code Detection Method based on Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14257/ijsia.2015.9.5.21
- The paper
- Li, Y., Ma, R., & Jiao, R. (2015). A Hybrid Malicious Code Detection Method based on Deep Learning. International Journal of Security and Its Applications. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2015.9.5.21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.