Cited by 36Nursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCancer survivorship and care

Care for carers: an investigation on family caregivers' needs, tasks, and experiences

Open access
Zavagli, Veronica, Raccichini, Melania, Ercolani, Giacomo, Franchini, Luca, Varani, Silvia, Pannuti, Raffaella·2019·Universita' degli Studi di Salerno

Abstract

Family caregivers have an essential active role in cancer patients assistance at home. They play a key role in the management of patients and provide some caregiving activities once provided only by professional caregivers. Often they are not adequately trained or prepared, however a systematic assessment of their needs is rarely practiced. For these reasons, this preliminary investigation was designed to better identify the needs and changes in the lifestyles of family caregivers of home cancer palliative care. Participants have completed a battery of self-report questionnaires, including the Caregiving Tasks Consequences and Needs Questionnaire (CaTCoN), that measures caregivers' experiences (the extent of cancer caregiving tasks and consequences) and the caregivers' needs, mainly concerning the interaction with the health care professionals. The results confirmed that cancer caregiving is burdensome. Large proportions of caregivers experienced substantial caregiving workload as well as a range of negative consequences, e.g. lack of time for social relations. Furthermore, considerable proportions of caregivers experienced problems or had unmet needs regarding the interaction with health care professionals. Prominent problematic aspects included the provision of enough information to the caregivers and attention to the caregivers' well-being and feelings. The assessment of caregivers' needs is a critical step for determining appropriate support services, providing high-quality care, achieving caregiver satisfaction, and decreasing caregiver burden. Findings of this investigation will certainly contribute to develop and publish Guidelines and to provide programmes and on-going education where caregivers feel supported in their role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.14273/unisa-2723

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]3. Kitrungroter L Cohen MZ Quality of life of family caregivers of patients with cancer: a literature review Oncol Nurs Forum 2006 33 3 625 632 16676018
  2. [19]19. Ventura AD Burney S Brooker J Fletcher J Ricciardelli L Home-based palliative care: a systematic literature review of the self-reported unmet needs of patients and carers Palliat Med 2014 28 5 391 402 24292156
  3. [20]20. Lund L Ross L Petersen MA Groenvold M Cancer caregiving tasks and consequences and their associations with caregiver status and the caregiver’s relationship to the patient: a survey BMC Cancer 2014 14 541 25069703 PMC4122762
  4. [23]23. Casadio M Biasco G Abernethy A Bonazzi V Pannuti R Pannuti F The National Tumor Association Foundation (ANT): A 30 year old model of home palliative care BMC Palliat Care 2010 9 12 20529310 PMC2900232
  5. [31]31. Janse B Huijsman R de Kuyper RDM Fabbricotti IN The effects of an integrated care intervention for the frail elderly on informal caregivers: a quasi-experimental study BMC Geriatrics 2014 14 58 24885828 PMC4021048
  6. [32]32. Tziraki-Segal C De Luca V Santana S Tramontano G Romano R Scattola P Creating a Culture of Health in planning and implementing innovative strategies addressing non-communicable chronic diseases Front Sociol “in press” 2019 PMC8022497 33869336

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavagli, V., Raccichini, M., Ercolani, G., Franchini, L., Varani, S., & Pannuti, R.
Affiliations
ANT Foundation Italy Onlus (IT)
Venue
Universita' degli Studi di Salerno
Publisher
Universita' degli Studi di Salerno
Published
2019
Volume
19
Pages
54-59
OpenAlex
W2982611451
Cited by
36
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Università degli Studi di Salerno
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
family caregivers, cancer caregiving, home-based palliative care, caregiver needs, caregiver burden, caregiving responsibilities, caregiver well-being, caregiver education, caregiver support services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review