Cited by 40Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Pimavanserin in Alzheimer's Disease Psychosis: Efficacy in Patients with More Pronounced Psychotic Symptoms

Open access
Ballard, Clive, Youakim, J.M., Coate, B., Stankovic, S.·2019·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pimavanserin is a 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist and is approved in the United States for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy of pimavanserin on symptoms of psychosis in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Nursing home residents. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AD psychosis. INTERVENTIONS: Pimavanserin 34 mg or placebo daily for 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline at Week 6 on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version psychosis score (NPI-NH-PS). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, the mean change in NPI-NH-PS and the responder rates among those with baseline NPI-NH-PS ≥12 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 181 patients randomized (n=90 pimavanserin; n=91 placebo), 57 had baseline NPI-NH-PS ≥12 (n=27 pimavanserin; n=30 placebo). In this severe subgroup, large treatment effects were observed (delta=-4.43, Cohen's d=-0.73, p=0.011), and ≥30% improvement was 88.9% vs. 43.3% (p<0.001) and ≥50% improvement was 77.8% vs. 43.3% (p=0.008) for pimavanserin and placebo, respectively. The rate of adverse events (AEs) in the severe subgroup was similar between treatment groups, and urinary tract infection, fall, and agitation were most frequent. Serious AEs was similar with pimavanserin (17.9%) and placebo (16.7%) with fewer discontinuations due to AEs with pimavanserin (7.1%) compared to placebo (10.0%). Minimal change from baseline occurred for the mean MMSE score over 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Pimavanserin demonstrated significant efficacy in AD psychosis in patients with higher baseline severity of psychotic symptoms (NPI-NH-PS ≥12). Treatment with pimavanserin showed an acceptable tolerability profile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14283/jpad.2018.30

Cites

27 of 28 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An earlier RCT of pimavanserin efficacy in AD psychosis showed differences favouring pimavanserin at week 6 but not at 2, 4, 9 or 12 weeks.

    “An earlier RCT of efficacy in AD psychosis showed differences favouring pimavanserin at week 6 but not at 2, 4, 9 or 12 weeks.(540)”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [540]

    The Study Design and Discussion describe a randomized placebo-controlled trial and report efficacy in the overall AD-psychosis population at week 6. The Discussion also says the difference from placebo was not significant at week 12 in the more-severe subgroup. Our copy does not establish the claimed lack of differences at weeks 2, 4, or 9, or a week-12 result for the overall population. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A pooled analysis of RCTs of risperidone using the CMAI (n=1150) showed a mean dose of 1mg/day was associated with an improvement of -5.4 CMAI points at 12 weeks.

    “In comparison, a pooled analysis of RCTs of risperidone that used the CMAI (n=1150) showed a mean dose of 1mg/day was associated with an improvement of -5.4 CMAI points at 12 weeks.(545)”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [545]

    The Methods (Study Assessments; page unavailable) mention the CMAI-Short Form, but the paper reports a pimavanserin-versus-placebo study, not a pooled analysis of risperidone trials. Searches for risperidone, the pooled analysis, and the claimed dose and CMAI change found no passage supporting the cited result. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Risperidone remains the atypical antipsychotic with the largest RCT evidence base in the treatment of agitation.

    “Risperidone remains the atypical antipsychotic with the largest RCT evidence base in the treatment of agitation.”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [545]

    The background passage on antipsychotics discusses randomized trials for psychosis generally, and the Discussion reports a pimavanserin analysis in patients with Alzheimer’s disease psychosis. Searches for risperidone and comparative RCT evidence found no passage saying that risperidone has the largest RCT evidence base for treating agitation. No page numbers were available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballard, C., Youakim, J. M., Coate, B., & Stankovic, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Acadia Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ballard, Clive
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
27-33
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889633769
Cited by
40
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
pimavanserin, 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, inverse agonists, nursing home residents, treatment efficacy, tolerability, adverse events, urinary tract infection, falls
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Piperidines, Psychotic Disorders, Urea, Treatment Outcome, Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review