Cited by 18Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsEthics in Clinical Research

Outreach, Screening, and Randomization of APOE ε4 Carriers into an Alzheimer's Prevention Trial: A global Perspective from the API Generation Program

Open access
Walsh, T., Duff, L., Riviere, M. -E., Tariot, P.N., Doak, K., Smith, M., Borowsky, B., Lopez Lopez, C. +9 more·2023·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevention trials require a large outreach and screening funnel to identify cognitively unimpaired adults who meet the study's inclusion criteria, such as certain clinical or demographic criteria, genetic risk factors, and/or biomarker evidence of the disease. OBJECTIVES: Describe tactics and strategies to identify and enroll cognitively unimpaired adults with one (heterozygotes [HT]) or two (homozygotes [HM]) copies of the APOE ε4 allele, a genetic risk factor for dementia due to AD, into the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative (API) Generation Program, the largest and only prevention trials for late onset AD using this enrichment technique. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Generation Program was comprised of two global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group adaptive design with variable treatment duration clinical trials. Generation Study 1 randomized participants into one of two cohorts: Cohort 1 which evaluated CAD106 vs. placebo or Cohort 2 which evaluated umibecestat vs placebo. Generation Study 2 randomized participants into two doses of umibecestat vs. placebo. The Generation Program was terminated early in 2019, while enrollment was still occurring. PARTICIPANTS: Both Generation Study 1 and Generation Study 2 enrolled cognitively unimpaired APOE ε4 HMs aged 60-75; Generation Study 2 also enrolled APOE ε4 HTs ages 60-75 with elevated brain amyloid. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Describe results of the centralized and localized outreach, recruitment, screening strategies and tactics as well as characteristics of sites successful at enrolling genetically eligible participants, with a particular focus on APOE ε4 HMs given the 2-3% prevalence of this genotype. RESULTS: At the time the trial program was terminated, 35,333 individuals had consented to the optional prescreening ICF1a/ICFA and provided a sample of DNA for APOE genotyping, 1,138 APOE ε4 HMs consented to screening for Generation Study 1 (ICF1b), and 1,626 APOE ε4 carriers were randomized into either Generation Study 1 or Generation Study 2. Genetic testing registries, partnerships with genetic testing/counseling companies, and the optional prescreening ICF1a/ICFA were the most successful strategies for identifying genetically eligible participants for screening. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to recruit, screen and randomize cognitively unimpaired APOE ε4 carriers, particularly APOE ε4 HMs for a global AD prevention trial. The Generation Program was on track to complete enrollment by end of 2019. Factors that were key to this success included: working with sites to develop customizable outreach, recruitment, and screening programs specific to their site needs, providing forums for sites to exchange best practices, and developing partnerships between the sponsor team and trial sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14283/jpad.2023.27

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two phase II/III trials of umibecestat in older APOE4 carriers without cognitive impairment were terminated prematurely due to observations of mild cognitive decline and brain atrophy.

    “However, two phase II/III trials (NCT02565511 and NCT03131453), conducted on older individuals with high risk of AD (carriers of the APOE4 allele) but without cognitive impairment, were terminated prematurely. This decision was made due to observations of mild cognitive decline and brain atrophy in participants.446,447”

    From Recent advances in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms, clinical trials and new drug development strategies. (2024) · cites this paper as [447]

    The Methods (Study Design; page unavailable) identify the two trial numbers and describe cognitively healthy APOE ε4 carriers aged 60–75. The Introduction and Results (pages unavailable) say the program ended early after a signal of mild cognitive worsening with umibecestat. Our copy does not say brain atrophy contributed to the termination, nor does it identify the trials as phase II/III. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]2022 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2022; 18(4): 700– 89; doi: 10.1002/alz.l2638. 35289055 · DOI
  2. [3]Betthauser TJ, Koscik RL, Jonaitis EM, Allison SL, Cody KA, Erickson CM, Amyloid and tau imaging biomarkers explain cognitive decline from late middle-age. Brain. 2020; 143(1): 320– 35; doi: 10.1093/brain/awz378. 31886494 PMC6935717 · DOI
  3. [4]Hanseeuw BJ, Betensky RA, Jacobs HIL, Schultz AP, Sepulcre J, Becker JA, Association of Amyloid and Tau With Cognition in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Longitudinal Study. JAMA Neurol. 2019; 76(8): 915– 24; doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1424. 31157827 PMC6547132 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Reiman EM, Langbaum JBS, Tariot PN. Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative: a proposal to evaluate presymptomatic treatments as quickly as possible. Biomarkers in Medicine. 2010; 4(1): 3– 14; 10.2217/bmm.09.91. 20383319 PMC2850446 · DOI
  5. [6]Aisen PS, Andrieu S, Sampaio C, Carrillo M, Khachaturian ZS, Dubois B, Report of the task force on designing clinical trials in early (predementia) AD. Neurology. 2011; 76(3): 280– 6; 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318207blb9. 21178097 PMC3034393 · DOI
  6. [7]Aisen P, Touchon J, Andrieu S, Boada M, Doody RS, Nosheny RL, Registries and cohorts to accelerate early phase Alzheimer’s trials. A report from the E.U./U.S. Clinical Trials in Alzheimer’s Disease Task Force. J Prev Alz Dis. 2016; 3(2): 68– 74; 10.14283/jpad.2016.97. 29210442 · DOI
  7. [8]Aisen P, Touchon J, Amariglio R, Andrieu S, Bateman R, Breitner J, EU/US/CTAD Task Force: Lessons Learned from Recent and Current Alzheimer’s Prevention Trials. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 4(2): 116– 24; 10.14283/jpad.2017.13. 29186281 PMC5724787 · DOI
  8. [9]Langbaum JB, Zissimopoulos J, Au R, Bose N, Edgar CJ, Ehrenberg E, Recommendations to address key recruitment challenges of Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Feb; 19(2): 696– 707. doi: 10.1002/alz.l2737. Epub 2022 Aug 10. 35946590 PMC9911558 · DOI
  9. [11]Langlois CM, Bradbury A, Wood EM, Roberts JS, Kim SYH, Riviere ME, Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative Generation Program: Development of an APOE genetic counseling and disclosure process in the context of clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019; 5: 705– 16: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.013. 31921963 PMC6944715 · DOI
  10. [12]Wessels AM, Lines C, Stern RA, Kost J, Voss T, Vlozley LH, Cognitive outcomes in trials of two BACE inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(11): 1483– 92; 10.1002/alz.12164. 33049114 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Sperling R, Henley D, Aisen PS, Raman R, Donohue MC, Ernstrom K, Findings of Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Outcomes of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Truncated Randomized Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021; 78(3): 293– 301; 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4857. 33464300 PMC7816119 · DOI
  12. [14]Sperling RA, Donohue MC, Raman R, Sun CK, Yaari R, Holdridge K, Association of Factors With Elevated Amyloid Burden in Clinically Normal Older Individuals. JAMA Neurol. 2020; 77(6): 735– 45; 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0387. 32250387 PMC7136861 · DOI
  13. [15]Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, Tijms BM, Scheltens P, Verhey FR, Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015; 313(19): 1924– 38; 10.1001/jama.2015.4668. 25988462 PMC4486209 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science. 1993; 261(5123): 921– 3; 10.1126/sdence.8346443. 8346443 · DOI
  15. [17]Ashford JW. APOE genotype effects on Alzheimer’s disease onset and epidemiology. J Mol Neurosci. 2004; 23(3): 157– 65; 10.1385/jmn:23:3:157. 15181244 · DOI
  16. [18]Van Duijn CM, de Knijff P, Cruts VI, Wehnert A, Havekes LM, Hofman A, Apolipoprotein E4 allele in a population-based study of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 1994; 7(1): 74– 8; 10.1038/ng0594-74. 8075646 · DOI
  17. [21]McCaffrey P, Strobel G. Don’t Be an Enrollment Loser: Throw Your Own Swab-a-Palooza! Alzforum2017 [Available from: https://www.alzforum.org/news/conference-coverage/dont-be-enrollment-loser-throw-your-own-swab-palooza.
  18. [22]Langbaum JB, Karlawish J, Roberts JS, McCarty Wood E, Bradbury A, High N, GeneMatch: a novel recruitment registry using at-home APOE genotyping to enhance referrals to Alzheimer’s prevention studies. Alzheimer’s and Dementia. 2019; 15(4): 515– 24; 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.007. PMC6461487 30772251 · DOI
  19. [23]Ilori TO, Viera E, Wilson J, Moreno F, Menon U, Ehiri J, Approach to High Volume Enrollment in Clinical Research: Experiences from an All of Us Research Program Site. Clin Transl Sci. 2020; 13(4): 685– 92; 10.1111/cts.12759. 32004412 PMC7359931 · DOI
  20. [24]Tarrant SD, Bardach SH, Bates K, Nichols H, Towner J, Tamatha C, The Effectiveness of Small-group Community-based Information Sessions on Clinical Trial Recruitment for Secondary Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017 Apr-Jun; 31(2): 141– 145. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000151. 27213625 PMC5116426 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, T., Duff, L., Riviere, M. E., Tariot, P. N., Doak, K., Smith, M., Borowsky, B., Lopez Lopez, C., Arratia, P. C., Liu, F., Scholten, I., Gordon, D., Arbuckle, J., Graf, A., Quinn, M., Ricart, J., & Langbaum, J.
Affiliations
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Novartis (Spain) (ES)
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
453-463
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323906574
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Biogen
  • GHR Foundation
  • Eisai
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Genentech
  • Novartis Pharma
  • National Institute on Aging (UF1AG046150, P30AG019610, P30AG072980)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
APOE ε4 carriers, genetic enrichment, amyloid PET, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, prescreening
MeSH terms
Adult, Alzheimer Disease, Genotype, Heterozygote, Humans, Random Allocation, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review