Clinical Correlates of the PET-based Braak Staging Framework in Alzheimer's Disease
Open accessAbstract
In vivo Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and staging is traditionally based on clinical features. However, the agreement between clinical and pathological Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, whose diagnosis assessment includes amyloid and Braak histopathological tau staging, is not completely convergent. The development of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers targeting neurofibrillary tangles offers prospects for advancing the staging of Alzheimer's disease from both biological and clinical perspectives. Recent advances in radiochemistry made it possible to apply the postmortem Braak staging framework to tau-PET images obtained in vivo. Here, our aim is to provide a narrative review of the current literature on the relationship between Alzheimer's disease clinical features and the PET-based Braak staging framework. Overall, the available studies support the stepwise increase in disease severity following the advance of PET-based Braak stages, with later stages being associated with worse cognitive and clinical symptoms. In line with this, there is a trend for unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease dementia to be compatible with early, intermediate, and late patterns of tau deposition based on PET-based Braak stages. Moreover, neuropsychiatric symptom severity seems to be linked to the extent of tau-PET signal across Braak areas. In sum, this framework seems to correspond well with the clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease, which is an ind…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prion-like transcellular propagation of tau pathology may underlie the stereotypical spatiotemporal progression of AD neuropathology described by Braak staging.
“This prion-like transcellular propagation of tau pathology may underlie the stereotypical spatiotemporal progression of AD neuropathology described by Braak staging [46, 47].”
From Toward a Unified Framework in Molecular Neurobiology of Alzheimer’s Disease: Revisiting the Pathophysiological Hypotheses (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · see citing works
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
PET Imaging of Tau Deposition in the Aging Human Brain
Schöll, M., Lockhart, S. N., Schonhaut, D. R., O’Neil, J. P., Janabi, M., Ossenkoppele, R., Baker, S. L., Vogel, J. W., Faria, J., Schwimmer, H. D., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
Murray, M. E., Graff-Radford, N. R., Ross, O. A., Petersen, R. C., Duara, R., & Dickson, D. W. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70156-9 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Dayan, A. D. (1970) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00687663 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Progressive Tau Accumulation in Alzheimer Disease: 2-Year Follow-up Study
Cho, H., Choi, J. Y., Lee, H. S., Lee, J. H., Ryu, Y. H., Lee, M. S., Jack, C. R., & Lyoo, C. H. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.221697 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Therriault, J., Pascoal, T. A., Benedet, A. L., Tissot, C., Savard, M., Chamoun, M., Lussier, F., Kang, M. S., Berzgin, G., Wang, T., et al. (2021) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000011416 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hein, Z. M., Karikalan, B., Gopalakrishna, P. K., Dhevi, K., Alkatiri, A., Hussan, F., Mohd Moklas, M. A., Jagadeesan, S., Che Ramli, M. D., Che Mohd Nassir, C. M. N., et al. (2026) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-025-05602-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Macedo, A. C., Durço, D. F. P. A., Tissot, C., Therriault, J., Vilela de Faria, A. O., Aumont, É., Servaes, S., Rahmouni, N., Fernandez-Arias, J., Wang, Y.-T., Lussier, F. Z., Bieger, A., Zimmer, E. R., Pascoal, T. A., Gauthier, S., & Rosa-Neto, P.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 414-421
- ISSN
- 2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390703159
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, Braak staging, tau PET, neurofibrillary tangles, clinical correlates, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive decline, amyloid
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review