Cited by 26Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Clinical Correlates of the PET-based Braak Staging Framework in Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Macedo, A.C., Durço, D.F.P.A., Tissot, C., Therriault, J., Vilela de Faria, A.O., Aumont, É., Servaes, S., Rahmouni, N. +8 more·2024·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

In vivo Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and staging is traditionally based on clinical features. However, the agreement between clinical and pathological Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, whose diagnosis assessment includes amyloid and Braak histopathological tau staging, is not completely convergent. The development of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers targeting neurofibrillary tangles offers prospects for advancing the staging of Alzheimer's disease from both biological and clinical perspectives. Recent advances in radiochemistry made it possible to apply the postmortem Braak staging framework to tau-PET images obtained in vivo. Here, our aim is to provide a narrative review of the current literature on the relationship between Alzheimer's disease clinical features and the PET-based Braak staging framework. Overall, the available studies support the stepwise increase in disease severity following the advance of PET-based Braak stages, with later stages being associated with worse cognitive and clinical symptoms. In line with this, there is a trend for unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease dementia to be compatible with early, intermediate, and late patterns of tau deposition based on PET-based Braak stages. Moreover, neuropsychiatric symptom severity seems to be linked to the extent of tau-PET signal across Braak areas. In sum, this framework seems to correspond well with the clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease, which is an ind…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14283/jpad.2024.15

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macedo, A. C., Durço, D. F. P. A., Tissot, C., Therriault, J., Vilela de Faria, A. O., Aumont, É., Servaes, S., Rahmouni, N., Fernandez-Arias, J., Wang, Y.-T., Lussier, F. Z., Bieger, A., Zimmer, E. R., Pascoal, T. A., Gauthier, S., & Rosa-Neto, P.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
414-421
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390703159
Cited by
26
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Braak staging, tau PET, neurofibrillary tangles, clinical correlates, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive decline, amyloid
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review