Cited by 176Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Quantitative histological studies on the aged human brain: I. Senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in ?normal? patients

Dayan, A. D.·1970·Acta Neuropathologica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00687663

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dayan, A. D.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Dayan, A. D.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
1970
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
85-94
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2998848300
Cited by
176
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid plaques, brain aging, frontal cortex, Ammon's horn, quantitative histology, normal aging, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Autopsy, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Histological Techniques, Humans, Middle Aged, Neurofibrils, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review