On the Importance of a Date, or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene
Open accessAbstract
This article argues for the importance of including Indigenous knowledges into contemporary discussions of the Anthropocene. We argue that a start date coincident with colonization of the Americas would more adequately open up these conversations. In this, we draw upon multiple Indigenous scholars who argue that the Anthropocene is not a new event, but is rather the continuation of practices of dispossession and genocide, coupled with a literal transformation of the environment, that have been at work for the last five hundred years. Further, the Anthropocene continues a logic of the universal which is structured to sever the relations between mind, body, and land. In dating the Anthropocene from the time of colonialization, the historical and ideological links between the events would become obvious, providing a basis for the possibility of decolonization within this framework.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The anthropogenic climate crisis is the result of a series of decisions originating in colonization, not human nature.
“The anthropogenic climate crisis was not caused by human nature, but, as Davis and Todd (2017) argue, ' it is the result of a series of decisions that have their origins and revelations in colonization ' (p. 763).”
From Creating third spaces in K-12 socio-environmental education through indigenous languages: a case study (2024) · cites this paper as Davis and Todd (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Barry, Andrew and Mark Maslin. The politics of the Anthropocene: a dialogue. Geo: Geography and Environment. Vol. 3, Issue 2 (2016). doi: 10.1002/geo2. · DOI
- Bateson, Gregory. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. 1972. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Bawaka Country, Wright, Sarah, Suchet-Pearson, Sandie, Lloyd, Kate, Burarrwanga, Laklak, Ganambarr, Ritjilili, Ganambarr-Stubbs, Merrkiyawuy, Ganambarr, Banbapuy, and Djawundil Maymuru. 2015. Working with and learning from Country: decentering human author-ity. Cultural Geographies 22(2): 269-283.
- Clark, Nigel. Rock, Life, Fire: Speculative Geophysics and the Anthropocene. Oxford Literary Review. Vol. 34, Issue 2 (December 2012): 259-276.
- Cruikshank, Julie. 2005. Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters & Social Imagination. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Crutzen, Paul J. 2002. Geology of Mankind. Nature 415, no. 6867: 23. doi:10.1038/415023a. · DOI · Paper page
- Grove, Jairus. 2016. "Response to Jedediah Purdy." In Forum: The New Nature, Boston Review, January 11.
- Haraway, Donna and Martha Kenney. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulhocene. In Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin (eds.) Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. London: Open Humanities Press, pp. 255-270.
- Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Johnson, Elizabeth, Harlan Morehouse, et. al. 2014. After the Anthropocene: Politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch. Progress in Human Geography Vol. 38, Issue 3, 439-456.
- Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 2016. It's Not the Anthropocene, It's the White Supremacy Scene, Or, The Geological Color Line. In, Richard Grusin (ed.), After Extinction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Povinelli, Elizabeth. 1995. "Do Rocks Listen: The Cultural Politics of Apprehending Australian Aboriginal Labor." American Anthropologist 97(3), 505-518.
- Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2016. Geontologies: A Requiem for Late Liberalism. Duke University Press.
- Sharpe, Christina. 2016. In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Duke University Press.
- Smith, Bruce D., and Melinda A. Zeder. 2013. The Onset of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 4, 8-13. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2013.05.001. · DOI · Paper page
- Steffen, W., W. Broadgate, L. Deutsch, O. Gaffney, and C. Ludwig. 2015. The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review 2, no. 1, 81-98. doi:10.1177/2053019614564785. · DOI · Paper page
- Steffen, Will, Jacques Grinevald, Paul Crutzen and John McNeill. 2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 369, 842-867.
- Whyte, Kyle. 2016a. Our Ancestors' Dystopia Now: Indigenous Conservation and the Anthropocene. In Ursula Heise, Jon Christense, and Michelle Niemann (eds.). Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. London: Routledge.
- Whyte, Kyle. 2016b. Is it Déjà Vu? Indigenous Peoples and Climate Injustice. In Joni Adamson, Michael Davis and Hsinya Huang (eds). Humanities for the Environment: Integrating Knowledges, Forging New Constellations of Practice. Earthscan Publications, pp. 88-104.
- Wynter, Sylvia. 2003. Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation-An Argument. CR: The New Centennial Review 3, 257-337.
- Yusoff, Kathryn. 2013. Geologic Life: Prehistory, climate, futures in the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 3, 779- 795.
- Yusoff, Kathryn. 2015. Geologic subjects: nonhuman origins, geomorphic aesthetics and the art of becoming inhuman. Cultural Geographies Vol. 22-3, 383-407.
- Yusoff, Kathryn. 2016. Anthropogenesis: Origins and Endings in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 33, 3-28.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Audley, S., & D’Souza, A. B. (2024) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2038833 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davis, H., & Todd, Z.
- ORCID
- Davis, Heather
- Venue
- ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies
- Publisher
- ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies
- Published
- 2017-12-20
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 761-780
- ISSN
- 1492-9732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2780693696
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 172 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 637.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- acme-journal.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- ACME (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Open Collections
- ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
- Keywords
- Anthropocene, decolonization, indigenous knowledge, colonization of the Americas, dispossession, genocide, environmental transformation, universalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review