Cited by 23Education, Leadership, and Health ResearchUniversity Challenges and ReformsEducational Leadership and Practices

Developing compassionate academic leadership: the practice of kindness

Open access
Waddington, Kathryn·2018·Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice

Abstract

This opinion piece paper argues that there is now a compelling need for compassionate academic leadership in our universities in both a national and international context. The premise of the paper is that universities are, or ought to be, ‘caregiving organisations’, because of their role and primary task of helping students to learn. However, the relentless neoliberal instrumentalisation and marketisation of higher education has eroded that premise. Yet universities still have a duty of care; a moral and legal obligation to ensure that everyone associated with the institution, whether this be students, employees or the general public, are fully protected from any personal physical and/or emotional harm. Care, kindness and compassion are not separate from being professional; rather, they represent the fundamentals of humanity in the workplace. Compassion is now a crucial and core concern in tertiary education. Arguably, in the future, universities that can demonstrate their compassionate credentials and pedagogy will be the successful universities, and this requires kindness in leadership and compassionate institutional cultures. Therefore, I argue that in order to nurture cultures of compassion, universities require their leaders – as the carriers of culture – to embody compassion in their leadership practice. However, this needs to be a shared approach, rather than a dominant, hierarchical top-down approach, and is characterised by openness, curiosity, kindness, authenticity, appreciation and above all compassion. The paper draws upon contemporary thinking and research around the role of kindness in leadership and the development of compassionate organisational values and cultures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14297/jpaap.v6i3.375

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an era of marketisation, contemporary university cultures in the United Kingdom and elsewhere are often characterised by competition and striving for prestige and dominance that stifles conditions in which compassionate pedagogy can survive and flourish.

    “Waddington (2018, p. 87) argues that, in an era of marketisation, contemporary university cultures in the United Kingdom and elsewhere are often characterised by “subtle, but powerful, competition and striving for prestige and dominance … [stifling] the conditions in which compassionate pedagogy can survive and flourish.””

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waddington, K.
Affiliations
University of Westminster (GB)
Corresponding author
Waddington, Kathryn
Venue
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
Published
2018-10-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
87-89
ISSN
2051-9788 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904320049
Cited by
23
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education, Leadership, and Health Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › University Challenges and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
Keywords
compassionate leadership, academic leadership, kindness, compassion, duty of care, neoliberalism, marketization of higher education, organizational culture, university leadership, authentic leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review