Cited by 17Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationBuilding energy efficiency and sustainabilitySmart Grid Energy Management

Estimating time constants for over 10,000 residential buildings in North America: towards a statistical characterization of thermal dynamics

Open access
John, Camille, Vallianos, Charalampos, Candanedo, José, Athienitis, Andreas·2018·Healthy, Intelligent and Resilient Buildings and Urban Environments

Abstract

Understanding the dynamic response of a building is essential in the design of sustainable energy-efficient buildings. Using data from over 10,000 smart thermostats, this study identifies patterns in the dynamic thermal response of residential buildings in Canada and the United States (US). The data set consists of one year of measurements recorded at 5-minute intervals for the indoor and outdoor air temperature as well as HVAC equipment run times. This study focuses on identifying effective values of time constants for the houses by applying the following procedure. First, periods complying with the following basic criteria are identified: a) the house is under free-floating conditions (i.e. when the HVAC system is switched off) for more than three hours and b) the outdoor temperature remains approximately constant (the outdoor temperature change is smaller than or equal to 2°C). Second, for each identified period, time constant values are determined by tracking the temperature responses of the house. These values are determined assuming the characteristic exponential decay of a first-order resistance-capacitance (RC) thermal model. Finally, a statistical analysis is applied to identify a typical range of effective time constant values according to month. Consequently, calculations show significant differences between estimated values for the summer and winter months, which may be attributed to occupant behaviour. In winter, the majority of time constants range from 15 to 55 hours. In summer, most of time constants vary between less than 1 hour and 18 hours due to occupants opening windows. In addition, the dependence of the time constant on the age of the home is investigated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14305/ibpc.2018.ps17

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heat loss coefficients and time constants used in the simulation of the park of buildings correspond to typical values for Canadian detached houses, as confirmed by field measurements [14,33,34].

    “The heat loss coefficients and time constants used in the simulation of the park of buildings correspond to typical values for Canadian detached houses as confirmed by field measurements reported in [14,33,34] and illustrated by Figure 3.”

    From EV Overnight Charging Strategy in Residential Sector: Case of Winter Season in Quebec (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract and Results (pages not specified in our copy) derive typical residential time constants from smart-thermostat measurements in Canada and the US. The paper does not report heat loss coefficients or establish values specifically for Canadian detached houses; the Discussion says analysis by home type is future work. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Miller, C., Nagy, Z., & Schlueter, A. (2017). A review of unsupervised statistical learning and visual analytics techniques applied to performance analysis of non-residential buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1-13.
  2. Palensky, P., & Dietrich, D. (2011). Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(3), 381- 388.
  3. Zawada, B. (2017). Experimental determination of parameters in models of indoor air temperature response to reduction in supplied energy. Journal of Building Physics, 40(4), 346-371.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
John, C., Vallianos, C., Candanedo, J., & Athienitis, A.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
John, Camille
Venue
Healthy, Intelligent and Resilient Buildings and Urban Environments
Published
2018
Pages
1383-1388
OpenAlex
W2964399403
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Healthy, Intelligent and Resilient Buildings and Urban Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Syracuse University Libraries
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
building thermal dynamics, time constant, residential buildings, smart thermostats, seasonal variation, occupant behavior, window openings, energy-efficient building design, Canada, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review