Cited by 117Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of Polyp Pathology Using Convolutional Neural Networks Achieves “Resect and Discard” Thresholds

Open access
Zachariah, Robin, Samarasena, Jason, Luba, Daniel, Duh, Erica, Dao, Tyler, Requa, James, Ninh, Andrew, Karnes, William·2020·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reliable in situ diagnosis of diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps could allow for “resect and discard” and “diagnose and leave” strategies, resulting in $1 billion cost savings per year in the United States alone. Current methodologies have failed to consistently meet the Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations (PIVIs) initiative thresholds. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have the potential to predict polyp pathology and achieve PIVI thresholds in real time. METHODS: We developed a CNN-based optical pathology (OP) model using Tensorflow and pretrained on ImageNet, capable of operating at 77 frames per second. A total of 6,223 images of unique colorectal polyps of known pathology, location, size, and light source (white light or narrow band imaging [NBI]) underwent 5-fold cross-training (80%) and validation (20%). Separate fresh validation was performed on 634 polyp images. Surveillance intervals were calculated, comparing OP with true pathology. RESULTS: In the original validation set, the negative predictive value for adenomas was 97% among diminutive rectum/rectosigmoid polyps. Results were independent of use of NBI or white light. Surveillance interval concordance comparing OP and true pathology was 93%. In the fresh validation set, the negative predictive value was 97% among diminutive polyps in the rectum and rectosigmoid and surveillance concordance was 94%. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of in situ diagnosis of colorectal polyps using CNN. Our model exceeds PIVI thresholds for both “resect and discard” and “diagnose and leave” strategies independent of NBI use. Point-of-care adenoma detection rate and surveillance recommendations are potential added benefits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000429

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Zauber, 2012, Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths, N Engl J, 366, 687, 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 · DOI
  2. Winawer, 1993, Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy, N Engl J Med, 329, 1977, 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701 · DOI
  3. Lee, 2016, Resection of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: What is the optimal technique?, Clin Endosc, 49, 355, 10.5946/ce.2016.063 · DOI
  4. Ponugoti, 2017, Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps, Dig Liver Dis, 49, 34, 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025 · DOI
  5. Kaminski, 2014, Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guideline, Endoscopy, 46, 435, 10.1055/s-0034-1365348 · DOI
  6. Rex, 2011, The American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy PIVI (preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps, Gastrointest Endosc, 73, 419, 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rex, 2014, Serrated polyps in the colon, Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y), 10, 671
  8. Wong, 2009, Observer agreement in the diagnosis of serrated polyps of the large bowel, Histopathology, 55, 63, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03329.x · DOI
  9. Ladabaum, 2013, Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions, Gastroenterology, 144, 81, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.054 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Byrne, 2017, Will computer-aided detection and diagnosis revolutionize colonoscopy?, Gastroenterology, 153, 1460, 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.026 · DOI
  11. Hewett, 2012, Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging, Gastroenterology, 143, 599, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006 · DOI
  12. Kuiper, 2012, Accuracy for optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in nonacademic settings, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, 1016, 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mori, 2017, Computer-aided diagnosis for colonoscopy, Endoscopy, 49, 813, 10.1055/s-0043-109430 · DOI
  14. Tischendorf, 2010, Value of magnifying endoscopy in classifying colorectal polyps based on vascular pattern, Endoscopy, 42, 22, 10.1055/s-0029-1215268 · DOI
  15. Iwatate, 2012, NBI and NBI combined with magnifying colonoscopy, Diagn Ther Endosc, 2012, 173269, 10.1155/2012/173269 · DOI
  16. Misawa, 2016, Characterization of colorectal lesions using a computer-aided diagnostic system for narrow-band imaging endocytoscopy, Gastroenterology, 150, 1531, 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.004 · DOI
  17. Rath, 2016, In vivo real-time assessment of colorectal polyp histology using an optical biopsy forceps system based on laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy, Endoscopy, 48, 557, 10.1055/s-0042-102251 · DOI
  18. Kumar, 2013, Optical biopsy of sessile serrated adenomas: Do these lesions resemble hyperplastic polyps under narrow-band imaging?, Gastrointest Endosc, 78, 902, 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.004 · DOI
  19. Byrne, 2019, Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model, Gut, 68, 94, 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ponugoti, 2019, Disagreement between high confidence endoscopic adenoma prediction and histopathological diagnosis in colonic lesions ≤3 mm in size, Endoscopy, 51, 221, 10.1055/a-0831-2348 · DOI
  21. Turkiewicz, 2017, Variable classification of right-sided serrated colon polyps among pathologists, Gastrointest Endosc, 87, AB465, 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2017 · DOI
  22. Flores, 2014, Variable recognition of sessile serrated adenomas among colonoscopists and pathologists—A compounded roadblock to reducing interval colon cancers, Gastrointest Endosc, 79, AB170, 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.179 · DOI
  23. Rex, 1999, Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice, Gastrointest Endosc, 50, 468, 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70067-2 · DOI
  24. Ulbright, 2018, Patients with small and diminutive proximal hyperplastic polyps have higher rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia compared with patients without serrated lesions, Gastrointest Endosc, 87, 1518, 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.028 · DOI
  25. Rex, 2018, Small proximal hyperplastic polyps are associated with synchronous advanced neoplasia, NEJM Journal Watch
  26. Urban, 2018, Deep learning localizes and identifies polyps in real time with 96% accuracy in screening colonoscopy, Gastroenterology, 155, 1069, 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zachariah, R., Samarasena, J., Luba, D., Duh, E., Dao, T., Requa, J., Ninh, A., & Karnes, W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
  • Monterey Bay GI Consultants Medical Group, Monterey, California, USA.
  • Docbot (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Zachariah, Robin
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2019-10-23
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
138-144
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2981861180
Cited by
117
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001414)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
colorectal polyps, diminutive polyps, convolutional neural networks, in situ diagnostics, adenoma detection, narrow-band imaging, white light endoscopy, surveillance interval, resect and discard, rectosigmoid polyps, point-of-care diagnosis
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adenoma, Algorithms, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Forecasting, Humans, Population Surveillance, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Point-of-Care Systems, Narrow Band Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review