The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Polyp Pathology Using Convolutional Neural Networks Achieves “Resect and Discard” Thresholds
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Reliable in situ diagnosis of diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps could allow for “resect and discard” and “diagnose and leave” strategies, resulting in $1 billion cost savings per year in the United States alone. Current methodologies have failed to consistently meet the Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations (PIVIs) initiative thresholds. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have the potential to predict polyp pathology and achieve PIVI thresholds in real time. METHODS: We developed a CNN-based optical pathology (OP) model using Tensorflow and pretrained on ImageNet, capable of operating at 77 frames per second. A total of 6,223 images of unique colorectal polyps of known pathology, location, size, and light source (white light or narrow band imaging [NBI]) underwent 5-fold cross-training (80%) and validation (20%). Separate fresh validation was performed on 634 polyp images. Surveillance intervals were calculated, comparing OP with true pathology. RESULTS: In the original validation set, the negative predictive value for adenomas was 97% among diminutive rectum/rectosigmoid polyps. Results were independent of use of NBI or white light. Surveillance interval concordance comparing OP and true pathology was 93%. In the fresh validation set, the negative predictive value was 97% among diminutive polyps in the rectum and rectosigmoid and surveillance concordance was 94%. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of in situ diagnosis of colorectal polyps using CNN. Our model exceeds PIVI thresholds for both “resect and discard” and “diagnose and leave” strategies independent of NBI use. Point-of-care adenoma detection rate and surveillance recommendations are potential added benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The stand-alone performance of CADx systems and comparisons of CADx performances with thresholds for clinical implementation have been evaluated and show promising results.
“The stand-alone performance of CADx systems and comparisons of CADx performances with thresholds for clinical implementation have been evaluated and show promising results.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) can help endoscopists in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps by predicting the histopathology.
“Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) can help endoscopists in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps by predicting the histopathology.”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mori, Y., Kudo, S.-E., Misawa, M., Saito, Y., Ikematsu, H., Hotta, K., Ohtsuka, K., Urushibara, F., Kataoka, S., Ogawa, Y., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0249 · Cited by 509
Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Thosani, N., Konda, V., Wallace, M. B., Rex, D. K., Chauhan, S. S., Hwang, J. H., Komanduri, S., Manfredi, M., Maple, J. T., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022 · Cited by 389
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Zauber, 2012, Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths, N Engl J, 366, 687, 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 · DOI
- Winawer, 1993, Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy, N Engl J Med, 329, 1977, 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701 · DOI
- Lee, 2016, Resection of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: What is the optimal technique?, Clin Endosc, 49, 355, 10.5946/ce.2016.063 · DOI
- Ponugoti, 2017, Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps, Dig Liver Dis, 49, 34, 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025 · DOI
- Kaminski, 2014, Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guideline, Endoscopy, 46, 435, 10.1055/s-0034-1365348 · DOI
- Rex, 2011, The American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy PIVI (preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps, Gastrointest Endosc, 73, 419, 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023 · DOI · Paper page
- Rex, 2014, Serrated polyps in the colon, Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y), 10, 671
- Wong, 2009, Observer agreement in the diagnosis of serrated polyps of the large bowel, Histopathology, 55, 63, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03329.x · DOI
- Ladabaum, 2013, Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions, Gastroenterology, 144, 81, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.054 · DOI · Paper page
- Byrne, 2017, Will computer-aided detection and diagnosis revolutionize colonoscopy?, Gastroenterology, 153, 1460, 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.026 · DOI
- Hewett, 2012, Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging, Gastroenterology, 143, 599, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006 · DOI
- Kuiper, 2012, Accuracy for optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in nonacademic settings, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, 1016, 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Mori, 2017, Computer-aided diagnosis for colonoscopy, Endoscopy, 49, 813, 10.1055/s-0043-109430 · DOI
- Tischendorf, 2010, Value of magnifying endoscopy in classifying colorectal polyps based on vascular pattern, Endoscopy, 42, 22, 10.1055/s-0029-1215268 · DOI
- Iwatate, 2012, NBI and NBI combined with magnifying colonoscopy, Diagn Ther Endosc, 2012, 173269, 10.1155/2012/173269 · DOI
- Misawa, 2016, Characterization of colorectal lesions using a computer-aided diagnostic system for narrow-band imaging endocytoscopy, Gastroenterology, 150, 1531, 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.004 · DOI
- Rath, 2016, In vivo real-time assessment of colorectal polyp histology using an optical biopsy forceps system based on laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy, Endoscopy, 48, 557, 10.1055/s-0042-102251 · DOI
- Kumar, 2013, Optical biopsy of sessile serrated adenomas: Do these lesions resemble hyperplastic polyps under narrow-band imaging?, Gastrointest Endosc, 78, 902, 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.004 · DOI
- Byrne, 2019, Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model, Gut, 68, 94, 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547 · DOI · Paper page
- Ponugoti, 2019, Disagreement between high confidence endoscopic adenoma prediction and histopathological diagnosis in colonic lesions ≤3 mm in size, Endoscopy, 51, 221, 10.1055/a-0831-2348 · DOI
- Turkiewicz, 2017, Variable classification of right-sided serrated colon polyps among pathologists, Gastrointest Endosc, 87, AB465, 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2017 · DOI
- Flores, 2014, Variable recognition of sessile serrated adenomas among colonoscopists and pathologists—A compounded roadblock to reducing interval colon cancers, Gastrointest Endosc, 79, AB170, 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.179 · DOI
- Rex, 1999, Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice, Gastrointest Endosc, 50, 468, 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70067-2 · DOI
- Ulbright, 2018, Patients with small and diminutive proximal hyperplastic polyps have higher rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia compared with patients without serrated lesions, Gastrointest Endosc, 87, 1518, 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.028 · DOI
- Rex, 2018, Small proximal hyperplastic polyps are associated with synchronous advanced neoplasia, NEJM Journal Watch
- Urban, 2018, Deep learning localizes and identifies polyps in real time with 96% accuracy in screening colonoscopy, Gastroenterology, 155, 1069, 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Central reading of ulcerative colitis clinical trial videos using neural networks
Gottlieb, K., Requa, J., Karnes, W., Chandra Gudivada, R., Shen, J., Rael, E., Arora, V., Dao, T., Ninh, A., & McGill, J. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.024 · Cited by 136
Self-citationvan der Zander, Q. E. W., Roumans, R., Kusters, C. H. J., Dehghani, N., Masclee, A. A. M., de With, P. H. N., van der Sommen, F., Snijders, C. C. P., & Schoon, E. J. (2024) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.029 · Cited by 27
Artificial Intelligence-assisted colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening: Where are we going?
Spadaccini, M., Troya, J., Khalaf, K., Facciorusso, A., Maselli, R., Hann, A., & Repici, A. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.203 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Zachariah, R., Samarasena, J., Luba, D., Duh, E., Dao, T., Requa, J., Ninh, A., & Karnes, W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
- Monterey Bay GI Consultants Medical Group, Monterey, California, USA.
- Docbot (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zachariah, Robin
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-144
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- PMC
- PMC6940529
- OpenAlex
- W2981861180
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001414)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- colorectal polyps, diminutive polyps, convolutional neural networks, in situ diagnostics, adenoma detection, narrow-band imaging, white light endoscopy, surveillance interval, resect and discard, rectosigmoid polyps, point-of-care diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Adenoma, Algorithms, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Forecasting, Humans, Population Surveillance, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Point-of-Care Systems, Narrow Band Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review