Cited by 635Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model

Open access
Byrne, Michael F, Chapados, Nicolas, Soudan, Florian, Oertel, Clemens, Linares Pérez, Milagros, Kelly, Raymond, Iqbal, Nadeem, Chandelier, Florent +1 more·2019·Gut

Abstract

Background: In general, academic but not community endoscopists have demonstrated adequate endoscopic differentiation accuracy to make the ‘resect and discard’ paradigm for diminutive colorectal polyps workable. Computer analysis of video could potentially eliminate the obstacle of interobserver variability in endoscopic polyp interpretation and enable widespread acceptance of ‘resect and discard’. Study design and methods: We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for real-time assessment of endoscopic video images of colorectal polyps. A deep convolutional neural network model was used. Only narrow band imaging video frames were used, split equally between relevant multiclasses. Unaltered videos from routine exams not specifically designed or adapted for AI classification were used to train and validate the model. The model was tested on a separate series of 125 videos of consecutively encountered diminutive polyps that were proven to be adenomas or hyperplastic polyps. Results: The AI model works with a confidence mechanism and did not generate sufficient confidence to predict the histology of 19 polyps in the test set, representing 15% of the polyps. For the remaining 106 diminutive polyps, the accuracy of the model was 94% (95% CI 86% to 97%), the sensitivity for identification of adenomas was 98% (95% CI 92% to 100%), specificity was 83% (95% CI 67% to 93%), negative predictive value 97% and positive predictive value 90%. Conclusions: An AI model trained on endoscopic video can differentiate diminutive adenomas from hyperplastic polyps with high accuracy. Additional study of this programme in a live patient clinical trial setting to address resect and discard is planned.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on CADx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of AI against the accuracy of physicians or against criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting.

    “Previous studies on cadx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of ai against the accuracy of physicians19,20,27–30, or against the criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting31–34.”

    From Experimental evidence of effective human–AI collaboration in medical decision-making (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Commercially available CADx systems communicate by textual or colored predictions, prediction probabilities, confidence scores or intervals, and/or position maps of suspicious areas, without justification as to why a specific method is chosen.

    “Commercially available CADx systems communicate by textual or colored predictions, prediction probabilities, confidence scores or intervals, and/or position maps of suspicious areas, without justification as to why a specific method is chosen.18,19”

    From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A Deep learning: Mit press, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byrne, M. F., Chapados, N., Soudan, F., Oertel, C., Linares Pérez, M., Kelly, R., Iqbal, N., Chandelier, F., & Rex, D. K.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
  • Beaumont Hospital (IE)
  • St. Luke's Hospital (IE)
  • Indiana University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Byrne, Michael F
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-10-24
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
94-100
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2765527079
Cited by
635
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
26.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ai4gi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
diminutive colorectal polyps, adenomatous polyps, hyperplastic polyps, resect and discard, computer-aided detection, convolutional neural networks, narrow-band imaging, real-time video analysis, artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, interobserver variability
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Clinical Competence, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Video Recording, Adenomatous Polyps, Narrow Band Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review